Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(56,582 posts)

2. If there aren't written records, it's "prehistoric"

Mon Feb 24, 2014, 05:59 AM

Feb 2014

England didn't have written records (that we know of) at the time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Prehistoric forest arises in Cardigan Bay after storms strip away sand [View all] Recursion Feb 2014 OP

4,500 years ago is hardly "prehistoric" Scootaloo Feb 2014 #1

If there aren't written records, it's "prehistoric" Recursion Feb 2014 #2

England didn't start writing its own records until the 6thc ... ananda Feb 2014 #3

Geeks and Romans wrote about England before that Recursion Feb 2014 #4