Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Confirmed: Oldest Fragment of Early Earth is 4.4 Billion Years Old [View all]
http://news.yahoo.com/confirmed-oldest-fragment-early-earth-4-4-billion-180642066.html;_ylt=AwrBJSCrSwtTTFUAB3zQtDMDBy By Becky Oskin, Staff Writer 19 hours ago
Confirmed: Oldest Fragment of Early Earth is 4.4 Billion Years Old
Ever heard this life advice? When solving a big problem seems impossible, break it into smaller steps.
Well, scientists just took one of geology's biggest controversies and shrunk it down to atomic size. By zapping single atoms of lead in a tiny zircon crystal from Australia, researchers have confirmed the crystal is the oldest rock fragment ever found on Earth 4.375 billion years old, plus or minus 6 million years.
"We've proved that the chemical record inside these zircons is trustworthy," said John Valley, lead study author and a geochemist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. The findings were published today (Feb. 23) in the journal Nature Geoscience.
Confirmation of the zircon age holds enormous implications for models of early Earth. Trace elements in the oldest zircons from Australia's Jack Hills range suggest they came from water-rich, granite-like rocks such as granodiorite or tonalite, other studies have reported. That means Earth cooled quickly enough for surface water and continental-type rocks just 100 million years after the moon impact, the massive collision that formed the Earth-moon system. [How Was The Moon Formed?]
"The zircons show us the earliest Earth was more like the Earth we know today," Valley said. "It wasn't an inhospitable place."
..more..
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, but since we need it, we generally think of it as required to be hospitable. (nt)
jeff47
Feb 2014
#31
I love this. I read other articles about using zircons to date ancient Canadian terrains.
Enthusiast
Feb 2014
#23
Ahhh. . .science. Ahhh. . .logic. Ahhh. . .science. Witchcraft! Earth. 4004 BC
Nanjing to Seoul
Feb 2014
#24
of course i see it. . .science to validate religious dogma is acceptable to Jeebus fans
Nanjing to Seoul
Feb 2014
#27
I think in this case it's not the age of the surrounding rock (the jeans) that is
petronius
Feb 2014
#33