Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

G_j

(40,561 posts)
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 08:43 AM Feb 2014

Confirmed: Oldest Fragment of Early Earth is 4.4 Billion Years Old [View all]

http://news.yahoo.com/confirmed-oldest-fragment-early-earth-4-4-billion-180642066.html;_ylt=AwrBJSCrSwtTTFUAB3zQtDMD

By By Becky Oskin, Staff Writer 19 hours ago

Confirmed: Oldest Fragment of Early Earth is 4.4 Billion Years Old

Ever heard this life advice? When solving a big problem seems impossible, break it into smaller steps.

Well, scientists just took one of geology's biggest controversies and shrunk it down to atomic size. By zapping single atoms of lead in a tiny zircon crystal from Australia, researchers have confirmed the crystal is the oldest rock fragment ever found on Earth — 4.375 billion years old, plus or minus 6 million years.

"We've proved that the chemical record inside these zircons is trustworthy," said John Valley, lead study author and a geochemist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. The findings were published today (Feb. 23) in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Confirmation of the zircon age holds enormous implications for models of early Earth. Trace elements in the oldest zircons from Australia's Jack Hills range suggest they came from water-rich, granite-like rocks such as granodiorite or tonalite, other studies have reported. That means Earth cooled quickly enough for surface water and continental-type rocks just 100 million years after the moon impact, the massive collision that formed the Earth-moon system. [How Was The Moon Formed?]

"The zircons show us the earliest Earth was more like the Earth we know today," Valley said. "It wasn't an inhospitable place."

..more..
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
proud to see u of wis research dembotoz Feb 2014 #1
Pretty damn cool davidpdx Feb 2014 #2
Impossible Separation Feb 2014 #3
I think the point of contention is this 1awake Feb 2014 #5
But scientists usually have broad frames of reference. fleabiscuit Feb 2014 #15
, blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #4
Does that mean my zirconium sanding belts are 4 billion years old? pangaia Feb 2014 #6
No. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2014 #7
Scientists could date the zircons embedded in your belt. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #25
Humm... interesting... pangaia Feb 2014 #37
Recommend jsr Feb 2014 #8
That is way cool! LibertyLover Feb 2014 #9
K&R. Overseas Feb 2014 #10
BLASPHEMY!!!! I was told 6,000.... Lobo27 Feb 2014 #11
That is super cool. blackspade Feb 2014 #12
Bwahahaha if only! CFLDem Feb 2014 #21
Unfortunately, probably not. 3catwoman3 Feb 2014 #36
I imagine he thinks God gave him a brain G_j Feb 2014 #40
K & R for science and discoveries.. mountain grammy Feb 2014 #13
very cool and thanks for posting this niyad Feb 2014 #14
"It wasn't an inhospitable place."....except for the lack of oxygen. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2014 #16
Life does not require oxygen. Xithras Feb 2014 #30
Yes, but since we need it, we generally think of it as required to be hospitable. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2014 #31
Freepers heads just exploded malaise Feb 2014 #17
For now, anyway... pipi_k Feb 2014 #20
Bwaaaaaah hahahahaha malaise Feb 2014 #22
photo, G_j Feb 2014 #18
Bullshit Tree-Hugger Feb 2014 #19
I love this. I read other articles about using zircons to date ancient Canadian terrains. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #23
Ahhh. . .science. Ahhh. . .logic. Ahhh. . .science. Witchcraft! Earth. 4004 BC Nanjing to Seoul Feb 2014 #24
Oh, no... pipi_k Feb 2014 #26
of course i see it. . .science to validate religious dogma is acceptable to Jeebus fans Nanjing to Seoul Feb 2014 #27
I don't think I understand radio dating of rocks. denverbill Feb 2014 #28
I think in this case it's not the age of the surrounding rock (the jeans) that is petronius Feb 2014 #33
I read an article at Wikipedia and I think I understand now. denverbill Feb 2014 #39
You mean this is not real nadinbrzezinski Feb 2014 #29
Zapping Zircon seveneyes Feb 2014 #32
So, is Australia's Jack Hills, like, the stablest place on earth? Brother Buzz Feb 2014 #34
Related, G_j Feb 2014 #35
The devil put it there. Blue_In_AK Feb 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Confirmed: Oldest Fragmen...