Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Pentagon Plans to Shrink Army to Pre-World War II Level [View all]
Pentagon Plans to Shrink Army to Pre-World War II Level
By THOM SHANKER and HELENE COOPER
WASHINGTON Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel plans to shrink the United States Army to its smallest force since before the World War II buildup and eliminate an entire class of Air Force attack jets in a new spending proposal that officials describe as the first Pentagon budget to aggressively push the military off the war footing adopted after the terror attacks of 2001.
The proposal, described by several Pentagon officials on the condition of anonymity in advance of its release on Monday, takes into account the fiscal reality of government austerity and the political reality of a president who pledged to end two costly and exhausting land wars. A result, the officials argue, will be a military capable of defeating any adversary, but too small for protracted foreign occupations.
The officials acknowledge that budget cuts will impose greater risk on the armed forces if they are again ordered to carry out two large-scale military actions at the same time: Success would take longer, they say, and there would be a larger number of casualties. Officials also say that a smaller military could invite adventurism by adversaries.
<...>
Even so, officials said that despite budget reductions, the military would have the money to remain the most capable in the world and that Mr. Hagels proposals have the endorsement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Money saved by reducing the number of personnel, they said, would assure that those remaining in uniform would be well trained and supplied with the best weaponry.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/24/us/politics/pentagon-plans-to-shrink-army-to-pre-world-war-ii-level.html
By THOM SHANKER and HELENE COOPER
WASHINGTON Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel plans to shrink the United States Army to its smallest force since before the World War II buildup and eliminate an entire class of Air Force attack jets in a new spending proposal that officials describe as the first Pentagon budget to aggressively push the military off the war footing adopted after the terror attacks of 2001.
The proposal, described by several Pentagon officials on the condition of anonymity in advance of its release on Monday, takes into account the fiscal reality of government austerity and the political reality of a president who pledged to end two costly and exhausting land wars. A result, the officials argue, will be a military capable of defeating any adversary, but too small for protracted foreign occupations.
The officials acknowledge that budget cuts will impose greater risk on the armed forces if they are again ordered to carry out two large-scale military actions at the same time: Success would take longer, they say, and there would be a larger number of casualties. Officials also say that a smaller military could invite adventurism by adversaries.
<...>
Even so, officials said that despite budget reductions, the military would have the money to remain the most capable in the world and that Mr. Hagels proposals have the endorsement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Money saved by reducing the number of personnel, they said, would assure that those remaining in uniform would be well trained and supplied with the best weaponry.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/24/us/politics/pentagon-plans-to-shrink-army-to-pre-world-war-ii-level.html
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Considering how much of our military "might" is comprised of mechanized technology...
theHandpuppet
Feb 2014
#4
Well, that's informative. Are you denying that we are paying Blackwater 'contractors'
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#17
We are outsourcing everything else, why not the military. They don't want to have to
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#34
When did cutting the military mean hiring mercenary armies in their place? Your OP was about
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#36
President Obama thanked ''civilians'' for their "sacrifices" and ''service'' in Iraq.
Octafish
Feb 2014
#23
I know you don't want to talk about the money being diverted from the military now to private
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#41
Apparently, announced cuts to the military seems to be causing some to panic. n/t
ProSense
Feb 2014
#43
Actually if there WERE cuts which would be passed on to taxpayers rather than Private Contractors
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#44
"Feel free to show how we the taxpayers will benefit from "shrinking the military", financially."
ProSense
Feb 2014
#45
You still haven't addressed how cuts to military personnel has anything to do with
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#48
Here's the title of the OP: Pentagon Plans to Shrink Army to Pre-World War II Level
ProSense
Feb 2014
#49
I haven't noticed any debate at all, other than the rolly poly guy which has come to
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#67
You should have read the article rather than just the headline. Still no answer
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#71
You're blaming the article for the bogus claim and your continuing to debate yourself?
ProSense
Feb 2014
#72
What was your point? Cuts to the Pentagon budget? If so, this has everything to do
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#37
Does this mean you didn't have a point? That's fine, we do and are more than willing
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#42
No, it wasn't, and your post was completely and undeniable irrelevant to my point. n/t
ProSense
Feb 2014
#63
Well, it's an election year. I expect we will see a lot of things that look like
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#50
"...from past experience, I believe we are all a lot more wary and questioning than we once were."
woo me with science
Feb 2014
#61
So would any ordinary DUer, like me. Are you confused?? I am not a 'journalist' nor ever
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#94
If you bothered to read BEFORE you respond to me....you would see that we were all discussing the
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#96
As long as you don't actually look at what they mean when they say "Pre-WWII level".
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#68
There has been changes for needs for the US protecting oil supply for the world, it is
Thinkingabout
Feb 2014
#85
Then how are we supposed to stop Zombie Hitler and his corps of elite reanimated Nazis?
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2014
#88