Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

proud to see u of wis research dembotoz Feb 2014 #1
Pretty damn cool davidpdx Feb 2014 #2
Impossible Separation Feb 2014 #3
I think the point of contention is this 1awake Feb 2014 #5
But scientists usually have broad frames of reference. fleabiscuit Feb 2014 #15
, blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #4
Does that mean my zirconium sanding belts are 4 billion years old? pangaia Feb 2014 #6
No. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2014 #7
Scientists could date the zircons embedded in your belt. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #25
Humm... interesting... pangaia Feb 2014 #37
Recommend jsr Feb 2014 #8
That is way cool! LibertyLover Feb 2014 #9
K&R. Overseas Feb 2014 #10
BLASPHEMY!!!! I was told 6,000.... Lobo27 Feb 2014 #11
That is super cool. blackspade Feb 2014 #12
Bwahahaha if only! CFLDem Feb 2014 #21
Unfortunately, probably not. 3catwoman3 Feb 2014 #36
I imagine he thinks God gave him a brain G_j Feb 2014 #40
K & R for science and discoveries.. mountain grammy Feb 2014 #13
very cool and thanks for posting this niyad Feb 2014 #14
"It wasn't an inhospitable place."....except for the lack of oxygen. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2014 #16
Life does not require oxygen. Xithras Feb 2014 #30
Yes, but since we need it, we generally think of it as required to be hospitable. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2014 #31
Freepers heads just exploded malaise Feb 2014 #17
For now, anyway... pipi_k Feb 2014 #20
Bwaaaaaah hahahahaha malaise Feb 2014 #22
photo, G_j Feb 2014 #18
Bullshit Tree-Hugger Feb 2014 #19
I love this. I read other articles about using zircons to date ancient Canadian terrains. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #23
Ahhh. . .science. Ahhh. . .logic. Ahhh. . .science. Witchcraft! Earth. 4004 BC Nanjing to Seoul Feb 2014 #24
Oh, no... pipi_k Feb 2014 #26
of course i see it. . .science to validate religious dogma is acceptable to Jeebus fans Nanjing to Seoul Feb 2014 #27
I don't think I understand radio dating of rocks. denverbill Feb 2014 #28
I think in this case it's not the age of the surrounding rock (the jeans) that is petronius Feb 2014 #33
I read an article at Wikipedia and I think I understand now. denverbill Feb 2014 #39
You mean this is not real nadinbrzezinski Feb 2014 #29
Zapping Zircon seveneyes Feb 2014 #32
So, is Australia's Jack Hills, like, the stablest place on earth? Brother Buzz Feb 2014 #34
Related, G_j Feb 2014 #35
The devil put it there. Blue_In_AK Feb 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Confirmed: Oldest Fragmen...»Reply #12