Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 03:14 PM Feb 2014

Does Hillary-Univision deal cross a line? [View all]

by Raul Reyes

Imagine if a major television network entered into a partnership with a presidential nominee, and promoted that candidate across their media platforms. Just think of the outrage and charges of bias that would ricochet through the press.

Or maybe not.

Univision, the country's top Spanish-language network, has entered into a multiyear deal with Hillary Clinton to promote the health, education and well-being of young children. As part of an early childhood development campaign that she began last year, Clinton has signed on with Univision to promote "Pequeños y Valiosos" (Young and Valuable), a program to encourage Hispanic parents to develop their children's language skills. Among other goals, the program wants to help close what is known as a "word gap," the vocabulary differential between low-income children and their classmates. Clinton and Univision officials kicked off the program at an event in at a Head Start program in East Harlem.

That's all good, right?

Not really. Although the program has worthy goals, the problem here is that a major broadcaster is getting awfully close to a presumptive nominee for president. A second problem is that many in the press are largely ignoring this relationship. Marc Caputo, a political reporter for the Miami Herald, wrote about the Univision/Clinton ties, and several conservative media outlets picked up his column. But other than that, this has been a non-story — which is a shame.

more
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/02/23/raul-reyes-univision-hillary-clinton/5616437/

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #1
I suggest you reconsider using "Billary" when talking MineralMan Feb 2014 #4
That is sexist and demeaning language. Please do not use it. nt msanthrope Feb 2014 #22
As far as I am aware Hillary is not now running for any Office Bandit Feb 2014 #2
That was my first thought... yeoman6987 Feb 2014 #26
This may be a move that shows she's not planning on running again Scootaloo Feb 2014 #28
I'm not sure why this is a potential problem MineralMan Feb 2014 #3
I didn't write it n2doc Feb 2014 #7
I realize that you didn't write it. MineralMan Feb 2014 #11
Nope. Until someone declares their candidacy or forms an exploratory committee, no conflict. stevenleser Feb 2014 #5
How is Hillary's Spanish? Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #6
To all those who are saying Le Taz Hot Feb 2014 #8
until someone announces, they are not a candidate. geek tragedy Feb 2014 #10
Nobody is a candidate until they announce. MineralMan Feb 2014 #12
So, the answer is, "yes." Le Taz Hot Feb 2014 #14
No, the answer is, we apply consistent rules to everyone. stevenleser Feb 2014 #16
Yes. The answer is that Hillary is not a candidate for anything MineralMan Feb 2014 #21
because that is the factually correct answer. geek tragedy Feb 2014 #23
know what I mean? reddread Feb 2014 #30
What's surprising is that they expect others to hear it without a chuckle. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #13
Yes. EC Feb 2014 #19
Yes. It is a fact. Unless you have something formal from her Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #33
when she runs, then that will have to end. and, hello, Fox news contributors geek tragedy Feb 2014 #9
um... fox "news" does this for the entire right wing sigmasix Feb 2014 #15
As of now, she's still a private citizen EC Feb 2014 #17
Some people just love to hate. NCTraveler Feb 2014 #18
which language? reddread Feb 2014 #29
It depends on when she privately decides to run and when she publicly announces it. Whisp Feb 2014 #20
well if you want to make sure the voters know who you are... madrchsod Feb 2014 #24
No, line is not crossed. GeorgeGist Feb 2014 #25
But she is not yet a candidate, let alone the nominee. longship Feb 2014 #27
Certainly legit to ask a uestions why they are doing this. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #31
Hillary is not currently a candidate for public office Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does Hillary-Univision de...