Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Misogyny? Well, DUH! [View all]

Threedifferentones

(1,070 posts)
75. I agree with you marions ghost but I think you have left out half the story.
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 03:26 PM
Feb 2014

Women also need to support men who go against the grain of gender norms.

Your average woman is not really a feminist by the standards of DU. Most of them never really reflect that what they are attracted to is a stereotypically masculine sort of male:

1 He is to be tall and, if not muscular, at least lean.

2 He is to be in a "high-status" occupation and/or financially well off.

3 He should use those resources to cover all expenses on any dates or other avenues of courtship.

4 He should be assertive almost to the point of aggression, making most of the decisions and shouldering most of the load when life gets heavy.

Correspondingly, most women only begin romantic relationships by being asked out, they would hardly dream of choosing their own date. They are thus comfortable with being the objects of male pursuit, and uncomfortable playing a more active role. In other words, many women, whether they know it or not, want a man's man, they embrace at the very least the forms of sexism which have been referred to as "benevolent."

I too believe that this is mostly the result of our culture, that patriarchy is a social construct which is so old as to SEEM natural and inevitable, when in fact it is a choice people make.

But, sometimes on DU I am puzzled as to why some posters feel that growing up under patriarchy excuses the actions of these women who embrace gender norms, but not the men.

When I observe a man treating his mate as second class, I often wonder:

1How can he treat another human that way?
and
2Why doesn't she fight back against this oppression?

Over and over I am struck by the fact that these two questions have the same answer. Both the man and the woman grew up in a patriarchal system. They are acting out the roles they are familiar with, they are imitating the behavior they observed as children.

Children learn about sex and gender by observing adults. In many ways our gender roles give more power and privilege to men, but that does not mean the current generation of men is responsible for them. This generation of boys and girls will learn by watching the last generation of fathers and mothers, who in turn imitated a lot of what their parents' generation did, and so on back before written history.

And this brings up what struck me most about your post. For those of us who are sick of these rigid gender roles, the only way forward is to be very open about the fact that we are different and very supportive of other people who feel the same. It is imperative that kids today who do not feel comfortable living up to a patriarchal standard see that there are many adults who feel the same way. Otherwise they will probably always feel that there is something wrong with them for not fitting in with society, instead of realizing there is something wrong with society for not accepting them.

That is why these flame wars on DU sadden me greatly. The vast majority of posters agree that we should accept anyone who is open minded and kind as a good person, and that we should evaluate people as unique individuals instead of ranking them in comparison with an ideal man or woman. Unfortunately though in most threads about gender this broad piece of common ground is overlooked in favor of an endless series of relatively minor differences.

Differences like whether a swimsuit cover can be accurately described as porn, or whether a picture of it should be allowed in GD, the lounge, smaller groups, or not at all...sigh.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Misogyny? Well, DUH! [View all] Loaded Liberal Dem Feb 2014 OP
One second of searching. Bonobo Feb 2014 #1
Well, next time the male victim of sexual assault is told it's because his abs were so tight... Scootaloo Feb 2014 #2
Forgive me, I thought the OP was about social pressures to conform to certain body types. Bonobo Feb 2014 #3
Except you're not discussing. Scootaloo Feb 2014 #4
It's still considered "unmanly" to complain, men are considerably less likely to go to the doctor Fumesucker Feb 2014 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author icymist Feb 2014 #51
And all six videos start with the same two words Loaded Liberal Dem Feb 2014 #25
Ummmm...The OP was not about social pressures to conform to certain body types n/t btrflykng9 Feb 2014 #24
There you go ruining a perfect strawman. nt Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #26
:) btrflykng9 Feb 2014 #34
The OP is about misogyny BainsBane Feb 2014 #85
No amount of snarking, condescending, chervilant Feb 2014 #31
Let me know when a man's lack of a 6-pack affects the way he is perceived in a work setting. DanTex Feb 2014 #59
Really? Blue_Adept Feb 2014 #60
Not to a remotely comparable extent. DanTex Feb 2014 #61
women's attitudes about themselves do seem to have regressed in the last 30 years. TheFrenchRazor Feb 2014 #5
+1 btrflykng9 Feb 2014 #29
They have been in the "ladies" magazines Warpy Feb 2014 #78
"Porn stars without makeup" marions ghost Feb 2014 #7
I feel sad for this woman. Beacool Feb 2014 #41
Don't be sad. Blue_Adept Feb 2014 #53
Am I Ugly? (Boys version) Bonobo Feb 2014 #8
OK marions ghost Feb 2014 #9
It's the same thing as the 1% vs. the 99% BarackTheVote Feb 2014 #46
And that is why men marions ghost Feb 2014 #58
I agree with you marions ghost but I think you have left out half the story. Threedifferentones Feb 2014 #75
The devil is in the details y'know... marions ghost Feb 2014 #80
This reminds me of replies to threads on bigotry saying "there is bigotry toward other groups too" uppityperson Feb 2014 #16
+1. nt Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #27
the "Opression Olympics" -otherwise know as yours are "First World" Problems" but mine are important bettyellen Feb 2014 #36
I don't see that at all. Union Scribe Feb 2014 #45
It is truly sad that we can't discuss these issues redqueen Feb 2014 #10
And there it is... RC Feb 2014 #11
... redqueen Feb 2014 #12
This is General Discussion, not History of Feminism. RC Feb 2014 #13
I bolded the last half of the last sentence for a reason. redqueen Feb 2014 #14
Apparently you did not read much past the Title. RC Feb 2014 #15
"right back out you"? Are you fucking serious with this shit? redqueen Feb 2014 #18
Did you just post a cartoon to adults? And you want to be taken seriously? nt msanthrope Feb 2014 #19
I guess all the polical cartoons Tien1985 Feb 2014 #28
well Kali Feb 2014 #30
This thread and SO many more discussions online and IRL. redqueen Feb 2014 #55
Yes nolkyz Mar 2014 #87
What I love... Blue_Adept Feb 2014 #54
This is so awesome. bravenak Feb 2014 #76
That is the best visual ever JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #79
so start your own fucking thread is the point. Scout Feb 2014 #62
Why? This thread is as good a place as any. RC Feb 2014 #64
You want GD to become a safe haven? pintobean Feb 2014 #17
They're are most assuredly working on it. RC Feb 2014 #32
Well, boo hoo. You can only control the discussion in your group, not out here quinnox Feb 2014 #21
Here we go again. Using DU as a portal for pornography question everything Feb 2014 #20
I would think you would go nuts in the Sistine Chapel - RC Feb 2014 #33
Thank you Loaded Liberal Dem Feb 2014 #37
You're welcome. RC Feb 2014 #40
"Her"? Loaded Liberal Dem Feb 2014 #42
"swimsuit?" A thread that gives the illusion of any cover? question everything Feb 2014 #50
What I hear you saying is, if it is a painting depicting unclothed people, it is OK, RC Feb 2014 #52
The world isn't that evolved marions ghost Feb 2014 #56
I do, but do you? RC Feb 2014 #57
No problem with showing the cover & discussing here marions ghost Feb 2014 #65
I ask the question in reverse Kali Feb 2014 #69
Yes, there are question everything Feb 2014 #66
Just what DU needs is another thread on this. RC Feb 2014 #67
The difference is in the outcome and purpose question everything Feb 2014 #68
None of those videos fit "shock content or porn". 1 of someone's butt, others are teen/tweens uppityperson Feb 2014 #38
Did you really just call the admins of this site an "unholy trinity"? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #43
Tell me which of those videos is shock content or porn... Iggo Feb 2014 #47
Pornography? kjones Feb 2014 #48
"Not porn" marions ghost Feb 2014 #70
Was never big on Flying Circus. Movies were a little funnier though. kjones Feb 2014 #74
Really--you don't get it? marions ghost Feb 2014 #77
Thank you for opening my eyes kjones Feb 2014 #81
LOL marions ghost Feb 2014 #82
I do take misrepresentation of my words personally. kjones Feb 2014 #83
Adios marions ghost Feb 2014 #84
Strike that. kjones Feb 2014 #86
"...made to spec by the Humbert Humberts of Hollywood." Iggo Feb 2014 #22
Right On, Loaded Liberal Dem! btrflykng9 Feb 2014 #23
Yup, nothing more to say really... Lunacee_2013 Feb 2014 #35
I'm so glad that I wasn't a teenager in this era. Beacool Feb 2014 #39
Now that is an awesome attitude! It shows intelligence and beauty all of its own that is true Drew Richards Feb 2014 #44
Well, thank you. Beacool Feb 2014 #49
Those "Am I pretty or ugly" videos are a knife to the gut chrisa Feb 2014 #63
" Sleeping with a gal when we were both blitzed out of our minds" alp227 Feb 2014 #71
Damn, I'm tired of these male/female threads! mimi85 Feb 2014 #72
Those videos by teenage girls exemplify this problem better than anything else BainsBane Feb 2014 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Misogyny? Well, DUH!»Reply #75