Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Voters Blame Trade Agreements for Job Losses [View all]loudsue
(14,087 posts)60. EXACTLY!! And anyone that read Obama's books before 2008 knew Joe Lieberman was his "mentor"
The corporations have the democratic party leadership so tightly in their grips that they will continue to push out the Howard Deans of the world, and welcome in the Clinton/Lieberman/Obama crowd.
I read Obama's books. I know all about the University of Chicago and their philosophies. I knew Obama was a conservative democrat. I don't think even Obama knew how much the masters control the presidency, however. That part, I think, was even more conservative than he has been comfortable with.
Just my opinion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My brother, just about the lowest information non voting as you get, absolutely "KNOWS".....
Hassin Bin Sober
Feb 2014
#24
President Obama himself has admitted that NAFTA fucked your brother and his buddies.
bvar22
Feb 2014
#32
Duh. But that doesn't mean they should vote for Romney or Rubio or Christie.
Hassin Bin Sober
Feb 2014
#49
EXACTLY!! And anyone that read Obama's books before 2008 knew Joe Lieberman was his "mentor"
loudsue
Feb 2014
#60
Rahm Emmanuel, I'm sure, counseled Obama to "consult" with the insurance companies first.
loudsue
Feb 2014
#79
Notice how effectively they've turned protectionism into a dirty word?
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#52
Good idea, and stop giving subsidies and tax breaks to Corps that take jobs out of the
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#69
It couldn't be more obvious. Like Chained CPI, trade agreements are electoral suicide.
Enthusiast
Feb 2014
#14
You don't have to be paid to be wrong. Most of the suckers that have bought this line
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#38
Now it's a choice between being a "sucker", "sociopath" and "unimaginative, incurious, sheeple"?
pampango
Feb 2014
#43
No matter how you attempt to modulate your advocacy, regardless of all the jargon crafted
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#44
Now Europeans, Canadians and I support "global parasitism"? They will be crushed, I'm sure. As am I.
pampango
Feb 2014
#47
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it."
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#48
And yet those answering this poll will still shop for the cheapest price no matter what
BrotherIvan
Feb 2014
#34
We did last time, too. Google "NAFTA." Made about half a shit's worth of difference. n/t
TygrBright
Feb 2014
#37
if they keep it up people will start distrsuting those who talk down to them constanly!
MisterP
Feb 2014
#70
If we lose big in 2014 this is the reason. Not Ralph Nader or some other lame excuse.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#59
Sure, speak of cars. But also speak of the engineers who design them. "Foreign" workers
Romulox
Feb 2014
#83
Nice post, FreeJoe. "Care must be taken to make sure that those benefits are distributed fairly."
pampango
Feb 2014
#85
Some of the confusion comes from references to the TPP as "NAFTA on steroids" or NAFTA II when
pampango
Feb 2014
#88
And NAFTA was a trade agreement and the TPP, as you pointed out, is largely not.
pampango
Feb 2014
#90