Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Voters Blame Trade Agreements for Job Losses [View all]wolfie001
(7,667 posts)68. Yes you're 100% right!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My brother, just about the lowest information non voting as you get, absolutely "KNOWS".....
Hassin Bin Sober
Feb 2014
#24
President Obama himself has admitted that NAFTA fucked your brother and his buddies.
bvar22
Feb 2014
#32
Duh. But that doesn't mean they should vote for Romney or Rubio or Christie.
Hassin Bin Sober
Feb 2014
#49
EXACTLY!! And anyone that read Obama's books before 2008 knew Joe Lieberman was his "mentor"
loudsue
Feb 2014
#60
Rahm Emmanuel, I'm sure, counseled Obama to "consult" with the insurance companies first.
loudsue
Feb 2014
#79
Notice how effectively they've turned protectionism into a dirty word?
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#52
Good idea, and stop giving subsidies and tax breaks to Corps that take jobs out of the
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#69
It couldn't be more obvious. Like Chained CPI, trade agreements are electoral suicide.
Enthusiast
Feb 2014
#14
You don't have to be paid to be wrong. Most of the suckers that have bought this line
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#38
Now it's a choice between being a "sucker", "sociopath" and "unimaginative, incurious, sheeple"?
pampango
Feb 2014
#43
No matter how you attempt to modulate your advocacy, regardless of all the jargon crafted
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#44
Now Europeans, Canadians and I support "global parasitism"? They will be crushed, I'm sure. As am I.
pampango
Feb 2014
#47
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it."
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#48
And yet those answering this poll will still shop for the cheapest price no matter what
BrotherIvan
Feb 2014
#34
We did last time, too. Google "NAFTA." Made about half a shit's worth of difference. n/t
TygrBright
Feb 2014
#37
if they keep it up people will start distrsuting those who talk down to them constanly!
MisterP
Feb 2014
#70
If we lose big in 2014 this is the reason. Not Ralph Nader or some other lame excuse.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#59
Sure, speak of cars. But also speak of the engineers who design them. "Foreign" workers
Romulox
Feb 2014
#83
Nice post, FreeJoe. "Care must be taken to make sure that those benefits are distributed fairly."
pampango
Feb 2014
#85
Some of the confusion comes from references to the TPP as "NAFTA on steroids" or NAFTA II when
pampango
Feb 2014
#88
And NAFTA was a trade agreement and the TPP, as you pointed out, is largely not.
pampango
Feb 2014
#90