General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mom of Sick Connecticut Teen 'Collapses' in Court After Judge Sends Kid to Foster Care [View all]magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and I don't believe any ER physician is qualified to diagnose a disease this complex. They don't have the time or the testing available.
I suspect that this is, in part, a case of covering up initial errors in judgement, rather than admitting a poor decision at the outset. Circling the wagons, so to speak.
And the fact is that the psychiatrists at Children's do potentially have another motive. This policy is shocking, but the link comes straight from Children's.
http://www.childrenshospital.org/~/media/Research%20and%20Innovation/Office%20of%20Clinical%20Investigation/cipp_071_001_19_Special_Procedures_for_Wards_of_the_State.ashx
Wards of the State
Policy
Children who are Wards of the state may be included in research that presents minimal risk 46.404 (50.51) or greater than minimal risk with a prospect of direct benefit 46.405 ( 50.52) of subpart D
Children who are Wards of the state may be included in research that presents greater than minimal risk with no prospect of direct benefit (46.406 (50.53) or 46.407 ( 50.54) only if the IRB determines and documents that such research is
Related to their status as wards; or
Conducted in schools, camps, hospital, institutions, or similar settings in which the majority of children involved as participants are not wards.