Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoGreen

(4,036 posts)
4. While reducing active duty troop levels...
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 09:17 AM
Feb 2014

...is a good first step.

The real costs are the big ticket items (i.e. F35 & 12 active Carrier Groups and secret Black Project programs).

I am all in favor of a general reduction in active duty and active programs, if we simultaneously increase our reserve and guard components.

I would like to see major reductions in active Army, Navy and Air Force units/programs with slight reductions in the Marines, modest increases in the Coast Guard and modest increases in the Reserve/Guard for all branches.

And close half of those 800+ over seas installations.

(edited for spelling {as usual})
(good heavens, if I could only type it correctly the first time)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 Reasons Why You Shouldn...»Reply #4