Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Why Hillary Clinton could bury the Republican presidential field" [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)41. There was a form of justice in that though.
Picking Mark Penn was a pretty good sign she deserved to lose.
Will 2016 Clinton (if she runs) be closer to 1992 Clinton or 2008 Clinton?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Why Hillary Clinton could bury the Republican presidential field" [View all]
applegrove
Feb 2014
OP
but perception is the thing. Repukes are good at sullying reputations with spin
Pretzel_Warrior
Feb 2014
#9
I agree Obama has done a great job. I think the point that she is no longer responsible
applegrove
Feb 2014
#11
detaching herself from the current administration will make it easier for her run in 2016 no doubt.
Adam051188
Feb 2014
#15
The revisionist history that he came from nowhere was mind boggling. Here is the reception to...
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#43