Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)

16. Yeah, the NWO hardly has to be secretive.

Reply to pampango (Reply #15)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 03:58 PM

Mar 2012

You have much more conspicuous examples like the WTO, which dares to tell America what laws we can pass... to the point of telling us we can't protect dolphins.

You're worried about national governments getting in the way of global solutions, but global organizations like the WTO are known for getting in the way of global or local efforts to protect animals and the environment.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why the World Bank has no real intentions of reducing poverty [View all] G_j Mar 2012 OP

i think we should be sceptical of all our institutions whose purpose is said to be xchrom Mar 2012 #1

If you look at the governments in Latin America who really have reduced poverty EFerrari Mar 2012 #4

+1 xchrom Mar 2012 #5

this. KG Mar 2012 #8

yes G_j Mar 2012 #18

When in the history of the world has any bank cared about reducing povery? The bottom line has demosincebirth Mar 2012 #2

When FDR started the World Bank (and GATT and the IMF) at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944. pampango Mar 2012 #3

Corrupt and want to protect Corporations lovuian Mar 2012 #6

This New World Order? pampango Mar 2012 #7

Another heavily debunked conspiracy theory from the Birchers Zalatix Mar 2012 #12

If HW said it, that's good enough for me. The Birchers must have been right. pampango Mar 2012 #13

My point is that the New World Order problem is not invalidated just because Birchers pointed it out Zalatix Mar 2012 #14

It wasn't just the Birchers. "The militantly anti-government right, and secondarily fundamentalist pampango Mar 2012 #15

Yeah, the NWO hardly has to be secretive. Zalatix Mar 2012 #16

Population control Zalatix Mar 2012 #11

rec. KG Mar 2012 #9

If the numbers don't fit just change the numbers. raouldukelives Mar 2012 #10

I was friends with the President's daughter in college Dragonbreathp9d Mar 2012 #17