Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WOW, I never saw THIS coming: "Verizon CEO Wants To Charge You More If You Use Too Much Internet" [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)49. Well, if you happen to have a time machine, we can shortcut that.
But if you don't, we're going to have to go through the FCC rulemaking process, which has things like comment periods.
EVIL, SATANIC COMMENT PERIODS WHERE OBAMA WILL PERSONALLY DESTROY YOUR INTERNET ACCESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
even though they refuse to take clear opportunities to act right now and even though NOT acting now vastly consolidates the corporate power they claim to be so concerned about.
Because common carrier means more than just net neutrality.
For example, it's likely it would also require adding them to the universal access regulations. Meaning we'd get to pay for AP&T not bothering to roll out coverage to large swaths of Alaska.
You're also assuming that the ISPs would cheerfully become common carriers despite the massive increase in requirements, and would not sue to stop it.
Alternatively, they could tweak the old rules to avoid the legal technicality.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WOW, I never saw THIS coming: "Verizon CEO Wants To Charge You More If You Use Too Much Internet" [View all]
Miles Archer
Feb 2014
OP
If a lot of something is used, usually a better price is provided; volume discount.
democratisphere
Feb 2014
#1
Verizon already has tiered pricing for data; use more data, pay less/GB.
democratisphere
Feb 2014
#6
Nothing in the article speaks of charging high users a higher marginal cost
Pretzel_Warrior
Feb 2014
#9
I'm not sure what you are reading or how you are interpreting this article BUT......
democratisphere
Feb 2014
#10
that's ludicrous. the best method is charging user fees. not amortizing over everyone's costs
Pretzel_Warrior
Feb 2014
#38
"No plans" is exactly what it is. They are aggressively doing nothing.
woo me with science
Feb 2014
#42
And this is about much, much more than costs. This is another axe to democracy.
woo me with science
Feb 2014
#46
EVERYONE makes decisions on how they think things will go and then re-evaluates
joeglow3
Feb 2014
#30
This is about crowding out competitors and getting monopolistic control of content, not
Marr
Feb 2014
#32
What else do you buy where the total price you pay isn't a function of volume used or bought ?
dipsydoodle
Feb 2014
#50
The impact re: prices will pale in comparison to the impact on citizens from
woo me with science
Feb 2014
#52