Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 05:19 PM Feb 2014

Unprecedented interruption of Supreme Court Proceedings [View all]

by Carl Gibson

Early on Wednesday morning, inside the stuffy chambers of the United States Supreme Court, a man stood up in a crowd of 330 citizens to address the nation’s nine top judges. He wasn’t scheduled to give testimony, and wasn’t a certified legal expert with credentials to present an oral argument in the Supreme Court. His interruption of Supreme Court proceedings would be the first in eight years, and only the second in two decades. And for the first time ever, a citizen speaking freely inside the Supreme Court chamber was caught on video.

“I rise on behalf of the majority of the American people, who believe that money is not speech, corporations are not people, and our democracy should not be for sale to the highest bidder. Overturn Citizens United. Keep the cap in McCutcheon. The people demand democracy,” said Kai Newkirk of the organization 99Rise, before being hauled out of the courtroom and handcuffed. As of this writing, Newkirk is still in jail on charges of “haranguing” and uttering “loud threatening or abusive language" in the Supreme Court building.

Newkirk’s outburst preceded oral arguments for the McCutcheon vs. FEC case, which has been called “Citizens United, Part 2.” Shaun McCutcheon, C.E.O. of the mining industry-focused engineering company Coalmont Electrical Development, is the plaintiff in the case. McCutcheon, of Birmingham, Ala., donated $16,250 to the Alabama Republican Party in 2012. His company has donated to the campaigns of the most obstructionist Republicans in the US Senate, including top Republican Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Ted Cruz of Texas, who is credited with initiating the federal government shutdown of 2013. The latest oral arguments for McCutcheon vs. FEC were presented in October. It’s also worth noting that the Republican National Committee has joined McCutcheon in his lawsuit, along with Mitch McConnell himself, whose team of lawyers will be making arguments to the Supreme Court on McConnell’s behalf.

In January of 2010, Citizens United vs. FEC ruled that political contributions are an expression of free speech, allowing corporations to make unlimited political donations. Corporations were given the same rights as people after the Union Pacific Railroad vs. Santa Clara County ruling in 1886. Citizens United also paved the way for the creation of Super PACs – political entities that place no limits to how much one person can give at one time. McCutcheon argues because corporations are people and money is speech, aggregate limits for political contributions from individual citizens are unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

- See more at: http://www.occupy.com/article/unprecendented-interruption-supreme-court-proceedings#sthash.jlcx89ux.dpuf

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Need to make it a regular occurrence 1000words Feb 2014 #1
Daily. reformist2 Feb 2014 #13
If corporations are people and money is free speech, tax them like people!!! nt kelliekat44 Feb 2014 #54
That would constitute radical change. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #63
awesome... Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #2
Discussed yesterday: elleng Feb 2014 #3
This is for those of us who didn't see it yesterday HarveyDarkey Feb 2014 #18
Yes, of course. elleng Feb 2014 #20
didn't see it yesterday. 2banon Feb 2014 #37
Unprecedented interruption of a corporate meeting jsr Feb 2014 #4
LOL SunSeeker Feb 2014 #58
My hero. Baitball Blogger Feb 2014 #5
That's a brave man JJChambers Feb 2014 #6
I can see why the words he spoke would be considered Autumn Feb 2014 #7
Obviously terroristic. Octafish Feb 2014 #8
Bravo! rdharma Feb 2014 #9
Recorded on video? frazzled Feb 2014 #10
I think he had a compatriot with a cell phone who videoed it. onenote Feb 2014 #19
Yes, Thanks frazzled, I'm with you on this. elleng Feb 2014 #23
IF there were more "trite" outbursts heaven05 Feb 2014 #26
Hear, Here! 2banon Feb 2014 #35
I think it is great when citizens stand up against those who are destroying this democracy. In sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #59
A Patriot and a Hero. bvar22 Feb 2014 #11
Indeed! 2banon Feb 2014 #38
Exactly. n/t lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #41
As an officer of the Court, I can't condone this interruption. Laelth Feb 2014 #12
Is there contempt of court in the Supreme Court? JJChambers Feb 2014 #14
Absolutely. Laelth Feb 2014 #16
The Supreme Court certainly has my contempt! n/t justhanginon Feb 2014 #29
and mine... n/t 2banon Feb 2014 #39
There may be five justices that are a real problem in terms of truedelphi Feb 2014 #15
I don't disagree with you at all. Laelth Feb 2014 #21
K & R malaise Feb 2014 #17
"hauled out and handcuffed"? heaven05 Feb 2014 #22
You think everyone has the legal right to interrupt court proceedings? That isn't free speech. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #32
Somethings REQUIRE disruption. And this Court, this hearing does. 2banon Feb 2014 #40
Sure, but that doesn't make it a legal right. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #46
Did I say it did? 2banon Feb 2014 #47
Was I speaking to you in the first place? No I wasn't. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #51
collapse? heaven05 Feb 2014 #55
“haranguing”? zappaman Feb 2014 #24
I may not like their decisions, but I'd rather they decide treestar Feb 2014 #25
uh.. Citizens United was case law and precedent? hmm. 2banon Feb 2014 #49
did you read the opinion? treestar Feb 2014 #53
wow. just wow. 2banon Feb 2014 #56
But several of the supreme court justices are in fact self righteous know-it alls. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #64
Supreme Court lsewpershad Feb 2014 #27
This guy made my Christmas list. santamargarita Feb 2014 #28
He didn't pay to speak. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2014 #30
Bingo TroglodyteScholar Feb 2014 #50
Yes. That idea is spot on. $1 =1 vote. glinda Feb 2014 #52
They still let US Citizens into the Supreme Court building?!?! blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #31
I am sure Alito was furiously shaking his head kairos12 Feb 2014 #33
I thought this would be about Clarence Thomas actually saying something. Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #34
My kind of human. byronius Feb 2014 #36
Citizens United is Fascism. maindawg Feb 2014 #42
Kai Newkirk is a hero. blackspade Feb 2014 #43
Challenging the Master is always difficult nikto Feb 2014 #44
This Supreme Corporatist Court has been increasingly Haranguing LarryNM Feb 2014 #45
Thank you, Kai Newkirk, for shooting rockets up the assholes of five assholes indepat Feb 2014 #48
oh the irony.... mike_c Feb 2014 #57
Free speech is not allowed OldHippieChick Feb 2014 #61
Asking for justice by interrupting the Supreme Corporation of the United States. Right. jtuck004 Feb 2014 #60
The k Berlum Feb 2014 #62
the supreme court is not used to hearing from the lowly people...they are above 'outbursts' spanone Feb 2014 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Unprecedented interruptio...