Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is the term "people of color" still used? [View all]antiquie
(4,299 posts)52. A lot longer than five years ago.
Person of color is a term used primarily in the United States to describe any person who is not white. The term is meant to be inclusive among non-white groups, emphasizing common experiences of racism. People of color was introduced as a preferable replacement to both non-white and minority, which are also inclusive, because it frames the subject positively; non-white defines people in terms of what they are not (white), and minority frequently carries a subordinate connotation
Although the term citizens of color was used by Martin Luther King, Jr. in 1963, and other uses date to as early as 1793, people of color did not gain prominence for many years. Influenced by radical theorists like Frantz Fanon, racial justice activists in the U.S. began to use the term people of color in the late 1970s and early 1980s. By the late 1980s and early 1990s, it was in wide circulation. Both anti-racist activists and academics sought to move understandings of race beyond the black-white binary then prevalent.
According to Stephen Saris, in the United States there are two big racial divides. "First, there is the black-white kind, which is basically anti-black". The second racial divide is the one "between whites and everyone else" with whites being "narrowly construed" and everyone else being called "people of color". Because the term people of color includes vastly different people with only the common distinction of not being white, it draws attention to the fundamental role of racialization in the United States. It acts as "a recognition that certain people are racialized" and serves to emphasize "the importance of coalition" by "making connections between the ways different 'people of color' are racialized." As Joseph Truman explains, the term people of color is attractive because it unites disparate racial and ethnic groups into a larger collective in solidarity with one another.
Furthermore, the term persons of color has been embraced and used to replace the term minority because the term minority could, but not necessarily according to proper context, imply inferiority and disfranchisement. In addition, people of color constitute the majority population in certain U.S. cities, in most countries, and in the world as a whole. However, some people who do not identify as white, as well as people who may be of mixed race, feel alienated by the term, feeling that it places too much emphasis on the color of a person's skin, and that skin color is not what determines race or even ethnicity or heritage.
Although the term citizens of color was used by Martin Luther King, Jr. in 1963, and other uses date to as early as 1793, people of color did not gain prominence for many years. Influenced by radical theorists like Frantz Fanon, racial justice activists in the U.S. began to use the term people of color in the late 1970s and early 1980s. By the late 1980s and early 1990s, it was in wide circulation. Both anti-racist activists and academics sought to move understandings of race beyond the black-white binary then prevalent.
According to Stephen Saris, in the United States there are two big racial divides. "First, there is the black-white kind, which is basically anti-black". The second racial divide is the one "between whites and everyone else" with whites being "narrowly construed" and everyone else being called "people of color". Because the term people of color includes vastly different people with only the common distinction of not being white, it draws attention to the fundamental role of racialization in the United States. It acts as "a recognition that certain people are racialized" and serves to emphasize "the importance of coalition" by "making connections between the ways different 'people of color' are racialized." As Joseph Truman explains, the term people of color is attractive because it unites disparate racial and ethnic groups into a larger collective in solidarity with one another.
Furthermore, the term persons of color has been embraced and used to replace the term minority because the term minority could, but not necessarily according to proper context, imply inferiority and disfranchisement. In addition, people of color constitute the majority population in certain U.S. cities, in most countries, and in the world as a whole. However, some people who do not identify as white, as well as people who may be of mixed race, feel alienated by the term, feeling that it places too much emphasis on the color of a person's skin, and that skin color is not what determines race or even ethnicity or heritage.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
172 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
lol. Minnesotans have been known to spontaneously combust when visiting tropics
Pretzel_Warrior
Feb 2014
#6
Might have also originated from the "Colored People" signs I used to see as a youth when
RKP5637
Feb 2014
#105
I always thought it was an odd term, that it establishes "white" as the norm, and moves from there.
Throd
Feb 2014
#10
so it's ok now to discriminate against me because im white ? just people is what it should be.
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#45
i never liked the term person of color , like im invisible i dont care if it's a rw talking point
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#47
yes u r but i'd say youve done more than just comment but that doesnt answer my question
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#80
i just updated the post to answer ur question now answer mine. quit bulling me
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#85
i wont defend this anymore u dont like my opinion so your going to try to bully me in to accepting
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#88
Absolutely. Regardless of how sub-literate, inaccurate, or petulant it may be.
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#93
You are allowed your opinion just as I'm allowed to disagree. And I do... Vehemently.
M0rpheus
Feb 2014
#104
im not making light of any discrimination i just dont like the like the phrase
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#82
No one can prevent you from having an opinion. It is a foolish opinion, however.
kwassa
Feb 2014
#127
You can ask her if I know her well. I sure as heck wouldn't speak for her.
ScreamingMeemie
Feb 2014
#138
They why the big deal about me knowing my daughters well enough to know what they would think on
RC
Feb 2014
#141
The difference is I don't claim to know every thought or idea in my (or your) kids' heads.
ScreamingMeemie
Feb 2014
#142
Let's see... I told you what I thought about you thinking you know everything your
ScreamingMeemie
Feb 2014
#150
Wasn't "colored" the adjective used to designate things to be used by black people?
FarCenter
Feb 2014
#25
"People of color" may have been started by academic race theorists a couple of decades ago
FarCenter
Feb 2014
#31
It refers to people who were discriminated against all over the nation but especially in the South
JDPriestly
Feb 2014
#40
It is a term in popular vernacular used to describe those who are not caucasian.
Gravitycollapse
Feb 2014
#32
When did you decide race baiting was the proper way to conduct a discussion in GD?
ScreamingMeemie
Feb 2014
#71
That is an excellent way to put it in easy-to-understand terms for the terminally obtuse.
ScreamingMeemie
Feb 2014
#69
If Bob is black, from Illinois, why does society call him an Afican American.
NM_Birder
Feb 2014
#101
These are various "people of color" at least according to the definitions of some Americans
AZ Progressive
Feb 2014
#83
No one was paying attention to anthropology when the original card was dealt.
M0rpheus
Feb 2014
#147
Because "non - white" implies white as default and language can be clumsy.
TheKentuckian
Feb 2014
#99
OMFG is it REALLY that hard to tell the difference between the words "of color" and "colored"?!
redqueen
Feb 2014
#128
One is a prepositional phrase modifying a noun and the other is an adjective modifying a noun?
FarCenter
Feb 2014
#132