Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostincalifornia

(5,377 posts)
3. As far as I am aware no one has announced they are running for president in 2016. However, talking
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 11:04 AM
Mar 2014

About the midterm elections is a real concern since the republicans have been blocking almost everything, which essentially results in not only a lame duck president, but a lame duck congress.

That the president was able to get through what he has done is simply amazing.

As far as thinking about who should run for president, the respective parties do think about it now because they need to gather appropriate resources. The millions spent in presidential elections is obscene, and with the citizens united ruling it is more necessary than ever to start gathering these resources years before. They have to do their planning, and that means thinking about which possible candidates have the best chance.

Elections today are big business. Why is Hillary's name being thrown about, and some groups starting to collect money for a potential campaign for her, because that is the reality of how elections are run.

Before the bridge scandal, on the republican side, his backers were pushing him to go out to raise funds for 2016. Many in Republican Party thought he had the best chance In 2016. With recent events, it appears that may not be the case. There are groups in the Republican Party who prefer other candidates and ideologies, and they are doing the same for their prospective candidates.

Democrats are doing the same thing because you must start years before, or you will not have the resources to win.

Yes, the reality is that those with money can change the odds in favor of their prospective candidates. Welcome to the 21st century on how elections are run.

However, Howard Dean did demonstrate that a grass roots element can make a difference. Yes, he was wrongly characterized by a corporate media as an "unstable" candidate, mostly due to his opponents throwing the argument out, and the media propagating it, and he did not handle it adequately. However, Barrack Obama learned from those mistakes, and not only became the candidate over the supposed "anointed" one, Hillary, but did not let the media control the talking points, and won the nomination, and the presidency.

The same thing can, and should happen again for someone I 2016, and whether that is a grass roots Hillary, Joe, or someone else, these groups better start now, or they will lose. It also is a necessary endeavor for 2014, which is critical. That is unfortunately the way elections are run today

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I really like the last paragraph you wrote and Autumn Mar 2014 #1
Thought that was interesting also. KoKo Mar 2014 #6
These politicians are constantly campaigning. That's their main job and goal. Autumn Mar 2014 #8
That's why term limits are a bad idea loyalsister Mar 2014 #42
So WHO do you suggest could be more likely to win than Hillary? Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #2
Go back in time, after Bush's 1st term and ask the same question TalkingDog Mar 2014 #5
Sure you do. A lot of folks were talking about him as a Presidential candidate as of late 2004. stevenleser Mar 2014 #36
and enough are talking about Warren now. n/t Whisp Mar 2014 #38
Nope. This is nearly two years later in relative terms. stevenleser Mar 2014 #51
As far as I am aware no one has announced they are running for president in 2016. However, talking lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #3
they would still be for sale... magical thyme Mar 2014 #4
hindsight means nothing to the blind reddread Mar 2014 #7
We are done already...we're just debating the speed at which we hit the brick wall... Moostache Mar 2014 #9
+1,000,000! RufusTFirefly Mar 2014 #10
not necessarily reddread Mar 2014 #11
Anyone who does that gets thrown under the capacious DU bus n/t RufusTFirefly Mar 2014 #12
only by a few, no matter how persistent they are, they are only a few reddread Mar 2014 #13
eeesh, I sure wouldn't make driving drunk sound like an adventurish fun time... Whisp Mar 2014 #40
ill leave those worries to the deceivers and hypocrites reddread Mar 2014 #43
drunk drivers are a menace, sorry if that hurts your feelings. n/t Whisp Mar 2014 #44
not at all, but thanks for considering them reddread Mar 2014 #46
you really want to go there, don't you? Whisp Mar 2014 #49
I do reddread Mar 2014 #50
Your analogy is perfect tea and oranges Mar 2014 #14
AND the supreme court! We need to impeach some of those bastards NOW! loudsue Mar 2014 #15
I vote for neither bigwillq Mar 2014 #16
A "Nother Neither" here. NRaleighLiberal Mar 2014 #17
wouldnt they both be on their first term? RedstDem Mar 2014 #18
Clarence Thomas n/t reddread Mar 2014 #19
please dont say that name RedstDem Mar 2014 #20
as Biden does me reddread Mar 2014 #21
biden makes you wanna puke? RedstDem Mar 2014 #37
I teke that sort of treachery more seriously than honest morons. reddread Mar 2014 #39
thomas cant even bring himself to speak while in court RedstDem Mar 2014 #41
he could not get arrested. reddread Mar 2014 #47
There's the Outta Touch Problem tea and oranges Mar 2014 #22
Neither for me. LuvNewcastle Mar 2014 #23
I liked your headline and last paragraph. woo me with science Mar 2014 #24
I agree with Term Limits.. blue14u Mar 2014 #25
Technology does not trump the humanities swilton Mar 2014 #26
Who said that anyone is owed the presidency? Beacool Mar 2014 #27
Neither.. n/t Smarmie Doofus Mar 2014 #28
We have term limits in California. The politicians spend a lot of time looking for their next job. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #29
no kidding, they dont fuck around reddread Mar 2014 #30
"In this time we live in, gender (female) trumps sitting-veep." YoungDemCA Mar 2014 #31
The media is obsessed with the "first female president" meme SoCalDem Mar 2014 #34
Rec'd for the intelligent point about age BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #32
Warren-Grayson, or Grayson-Warren. Aristus Mar 2014 #33
Neither. Octafish Mar 2014 #35
I didn't know Steve Kimock was considering running. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #45
neither! n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #48
THANK YOU SoCalDem! so well stated! rustydog Mar 2014 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden? Clinton?.. How abo...»Reply #3