Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Study: Breast Feeding No Better Than Bottle Feeding For Kids’ Health [View all]Crunchy Frog
(28,280 posts)56. It was a spinal.
I was a doula for a woman who had twins via c-section with exactly the same anesthetic and in the same hospital. They had her breastfeeding both babies within the hour. They as much as admitted to me later on that the reason for the delay was that I got lost in the shuffle and they simply forgot about me.
And I'm not thinking of myself in terms of "failure". Only my ability to build up a decent milk supply, which certainly was a failure. I don't feel any "guilt" or "failure" about my breastfeeding difficulties (and I did still partially breastfeed for around 6 months) but I do feel a sense of loss and regret, and will not allow anyone to tell me how I "should" feel about it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Study: Breast Feeding No Better Than Bottle Feeding For Kids’ Health [View all]
The Straight Story
Feb 2014
OP
It was only within families that the benefits of breast feeding were less observable.
morningfog
Feb 2014
#11
But it doesn't address the health of babies from 0 - 4, which mothers presumably
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#27
The Study is here but it is pay to view (I think it is $39). I am interested but not $39 interested.
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#15
Yeah, but you'll never see a bottle of formula on the cover of Sports Illustrated.
aikoaiko
Feb 2014
#24
Real irony: years ago, there was a boycott of Nestles for handing out free samples
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#25
So? Why didn't they study the health of babies and toddlers who were being breastfed
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#26
That's not true. Older babies still benefit from antibodies, just not to the same extent
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#31
Yes, it does. The breastmilk continues to contain antibodies, although, yes, it is less dense
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#34
Link please? I've searched for anything backing up your theory, and haven't found it.
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#39
Let's suppose you're right. The infant/baby is still protected by factors in the mother's milk
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#78
Jeff37. What evidence do you have for your beliefs about the human immune system?
vanlassie
Mar 2014
#65
Because I think you can google as well as anyone else, and cut and paste a link.
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#73
I did not say that all antibodies did that. Logically, there is a key difference
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#79
I agree, no better, no worse for average mother and child…Mom's who want and can't/don't prob feel
Tikki
Mar 2014
#51
Jaundice in breastfed babies, if it raises above normal limits, (because bilirubin has what is now
vanlassie
Mar 2014
#66
Did they account for whether or not the breastfeeding was done at Olive Garden?
Silent3
Mar 2014
#55