Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fuck your "pro-life" anti-abortion, pro-gun, anti-white privilege arguments. [View all]AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)175. Sad but damn true. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
217 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fuck your "pro-life" anti-abortion, pro-gun, anti-white privilege arguments. [View all]
TeamPooka
Feb 2014
OP
Knee-jerk anti-union sentiment is what has really destroyed this country, economically.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#33
It should not be and it IS against term of service at DU since it is definitely anti-dem platform
Drahthaardogs
Feb 2014
#104
ROFL @ the self-delete below this. Finally read the entire OP, did you? It was the gun thing, right?
Electric Monk
Mar 2014
#128
They interpret the bible to justify their ignorant and often persecutory beliefs to support
RKP5637
Feb 2014
#13
The RW powers that be are quite adept at dividing and manipulating the 99% using religion.
ErikJ
Feb 2014
#46
The basic concept is that some values should be non-negotiable. Now, we may disagree slightly
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#34
OK - I'm not sure if this is addressed to the few DUers who are Anti Abortion (and open about it)
el_bryanto
Feb 2014
#29
Then you're on our side. I have no beef with you at all, if that's worth anything.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#37
And of course, as we all know, generally the best way to reduce abortion is to
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#107
Problem is, I'm not sure certain posters really do believe in any of that.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#38
There are the blatantly obvious trolls, who usually get banned pretty fast.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#108
Start your own discussion board where everyone agrees with you 100% on everything.
Throd
Feb 2014
#23
"often our message is only of hate and intolerance for those who disagree" - unfortunately true
geckosfeet
Feb 2014
#35
No no. Not forever. But we need a lot of seats. Getting some southern, western and s western
geckosfeet
Feb 2014
#102
You're more or less correct. But I think both approaches have their place.
nomorenomore08
Mar 2014
#182
FYI about 90% of abortions are performed in the first trimester. And the majority of others
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#42
Exactly. If God is against abortion, then why does He cause so damn many of them?
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#53
Something (besides abortion) causes an awful lot of pregnancies not to reach full term
FiveGoodMen
Feb 2014
#75
yea that's why i kind of laugh when people say were made in HIS image becuse there are so
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#76
If the alternative is to deny abortions to some women who truly need them - and who may resort
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#55
Jog my memory, if you please - are you one of the posters who's basically said that they're opposed
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#68
you can curse at me, it doesnt bother me theyre just words. i dont care what women do to themselves
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#70
Fair enough. But you have to realize that what you want is ultimately secondary to the wishes
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#72
no im not secondary it's my baby also and i would expect to be part of any decisn on abortion
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#73
Ideally you should be part of the decision, but since it's not your body, she has final veto power.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#74
no im not is that difficult to understand and i dont give a fuck what you think about it
leftyohiolib
Mar 2014
#168
Thanks for knowing what i "really mean"; when I stated it perfectly clear. OP said ANYTIME.
7962
Feb 2014
#114
And why do you immediately zero in on the most objectionable cases, which no reputable doctor
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#118
The OP shouldnt have made such a stupid statement, thats why I pointed it out. Very simple.
7962
Mar 2014
#120
So mark you down as in favor of any abortion, anytime, like the OP. Check. Most Democrats do not.
7962
Mar 2014
#171
Women and doctors can be trusted to make safe and moral decisions. Period. Full stop.
PeaceNikki
Mar 2014
#181
So you contradict yourself. The OP is who made this absurd, not me. Anytime means anytime.
7962
Mar 2014
#145
If "pro-gun" means opposing any gun-control measures whatsoever, then no, it's not reasonable.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#44
I'm not particularly anti-gun in general, but I admit to having become somewhat swept up in the
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#111
I agree with basically all of your points there. I know that with roughly 1 gun for every person
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#115
Glad we're in agreement. Because honestly, that shit scares even lily-white me!
nomorenomore08
Mar 2014
#121
Then we need to apply checks to person-to-person sales as well. And heavily penalize - at least
nomorenomore08
Mar 2014
#124
"The concept of Privilege is a sociological term" Yes, I know that's what it was originally.
AverageJoe90
Mar 2014
#174
I, for one, didn't vote in that poll and I agree with AverageJoe90.
Waiting For Everyman
Mar 2014
#193
AverageJoe90, do you any factual support behind your pronouncements on white privilege?
kwassa
Mar 2014
#165
Given that an enormous percentage of democrats own guns, how do you define 'gun nuts'?
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2014
#48
I think you need a dictionary. According to the source you cite, 22% of Democrats own guns.
HERVEPA
Mar 2014
#203
Another way you can surmise the number of housholds I suggested is accurate is
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#205
I see no enormous percentages. Enormous percentage (as perhaps opposed to enormous number?)...
HERVEPA
Mar 2014
#206
anyone else notice that posts like this get a hundred responses while the posts that affect your
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#77
oh! im sorry if i offended you this was not a comment on this post and certainly am not trying
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#85
you always seem like a fight looking for a place to happen. thanks for the advice
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#87
Accusing me of being "offended" is not generally considered to be holding out an olive
ScreamingMeemie
Feb 2014
#88
The Problem is that People who use "Privilege" are not talking about themselves
Rilgin
Mar 2014
#136
Yes, the big tent includes people who disagree with you and may not be ideologically perfect.
aikoaiko
Feb 2014
#97
I know this sounds corny, uncool, unhip, old fashioned and REALLY square - but sometimes if we just
Douglas Carpenter
Feb 2014
#105
I've been listening. I've been tolerant of the intolerance for politics sake and I'm done.
TeamPooka
Mar 2014
#130
if one is interested in building a progressive majority it is going to include many people who may
Douglas Carpenter
Mar 2014
#142
To translate your post, 'money and business matter, not people and silly rights they want'.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#166
We are all on a journey. I am sharing my map. You may have a different course to plot.
TeamPooka
Mar 2014
#161
and don't forget to tune into tomorrow's episode of Knock Down the Strawman...
dionysus
Mar 2014
#125
That's some funny right wing stuff you got there. 'Hollywood' is a heavily Unionized industry
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#167