Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 01:27 AM Mar 2014

What fueled right wingers, fathers rights, mens' rights, gun rights & teabaggers into existence? [View all]

Last edited Sun Mar 2, 2014, 02:15 AM - Edit history (1)

Angry White Men, American Masculinity at the End of an Era, by Michael Kimmel, copyright 2013

I'm currently reading this book, and it's amazing.

Here's the synopsis from the inside flap:

One of the enduring legacies of the 2012 presidential campaign was the demise of the white American male voter as a dominant force in the political landscape. On election night, after Obama was announced the winner, a distressed Bill O'Reilly lamented that he didn't live in "a traditional America anymore." He was joined by others who bellowed their grief on the talk radio airwaves, the traditional redoubt of angry white men. Why were they so angry? Sociologist Michael Kimmel, one of the leading writers on men and masculinity in the world today, has spent hundreds of hours in the company of America's angry white men - from men's rights activists to young students to white supremacists - in pursuit of an answer. Angry White Men presents a comprehensive diagnosis of their fears, anxieties, and rage.

Kimmel locates this increase in anger in the seismic economic, social, and political shifts that have so transformed the American landscape. Downward mobility, increased racial and gender equality, and a tenacious clinging to an anachronistic ideology of masculinity has left many men feeling betrayed and bewildered. Raised to expect unparalleled social and economic privilege, white men are suffering today from what Kimmel calls, "aggrieved entitlement": a sense that those benefits that white men believed were their due have been snatched away from them.

Angry White Men discusses, among others, the sons of small town America, scarred by underemployment and wage stagnation. When America's white men feel they've lived their lives the "right" way - worked hard and stayed out of trouble - and still do not get economic rewards, then they have to blame somebody else. Even more terrifying is the phenomenon of angry young boys. School shootings in the United States are not just the work of "misguided youth" or "troubled teens" - they're all committed by boys. These alienated young men are transformed into mass murderers by a sense of using violence against others is their right.

The future of America is more inclusive and diverse. The choice for angry white men is not whether or not they can stem the tide of history: they cannot. Their choice is whether or not they will be dragged kicking and screaming into that inevitable future, or whether they will walk honorably alongside those they've spent so long trying to exclude. By explaining their rage, Kimmel is able to point to a possible future that is healthier, happier, and much less angry.


He discusses the failure of the American Dream to materialize (and read that, white male American Dream, as there was no American Dream for anyone but white males). He addresses the Mens' "Rights" allegations that men get beaten up by women with the same frequency as women get beaten up by men, and analyzes it with all the available data (and of course finds it to be pure BS). He analyzes the attacks and accusations toward feminists and feminism. He covers all the basics, using an analytical point of view, and studies by the hundreds.

I strongly recommend it!

295 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
fear Skittles Mar 2014 #1
I believe it's mostly white right wing males that fear. In fact, if I remember correctly... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #2
+10000000000! Zorra Mar 2014 #105
Thank you for this amazing article! I'm passing it on. (also the funny video) Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #145
Peril From 'Patriots' billh58 Mar 2014 #139
"Not all white men are racist, right-wing gun nuts, but almost all racist, right-wing gun nuts are Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #143
Much like Fox (via The Simpsons)... JHB Mar 2014 #172
LOL! love it! nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #173
Why must you broad brush all white males? Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #3
Does this mean you disagree with the synopsis? Which part? Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #4
I was replying to Skittles' post. Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #6
And I'd say that the overpreponderance of those angry white males are right wing Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #9
Thanks for acknowledging "some" exceptions. And don't let the fact that there are ... 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #295
To me (a white male) the mere fact that the majority of us support the greedy, racist GOP nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #30
That's bullshit and I don't accept that. On this site Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #35
Okay, then where's your brilliant solution for "solving" racism (and sexism, and homophobia)? nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #40
That just makes no sense whatever Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #45
I guess I personally consider being "stereotyped" (as a white male) less important than nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #47
It's not an either/or. Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #49
True. But given that negative stereotyping doesn't really affect my everyday life, it's not nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #50
At an ER it's called triage, at my work, it's called putting out fires... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #83
I hope you realize how illogical that is Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #112
Actually, it is illogical that you've said it's illogical. I'm not 100% sure you understand Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #114
No, she meant we can't spend all our time and energy worrying about offending those who are nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #256
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #60
Pardon me, but your point was not a point at all, and you asked no question Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #82
What's the worst they can do? YoungDemCA Mar 2014 #118
The post refer to those angry, racist, white males . . . brush Mar 2014 #150
I've seen you do quite a bit of stereotyping, so I find it rather shocking Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #81
Stereotyping is scorned on this site? You've never seen posts that say Squinch Mar 2014 #92
Taking online courses in "selective reading"? nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #259
It is a phenomenon, but this guy explains it quite succinctly. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #79
If you're a male why do Enthusiast Mar 2014 #54
:) nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #84
Umm, because these attacks are Kosher in GD? Eleanors38 Mar 2014 #86
Feeling persecuted because you're a straight white male? CreekDog Mar 2014 #234
Oh, not in the least. Anything changed since, oh, 1968? Eleanors38 Mar 2014 #237
well if something changed since 1968, i guess it's all okay then CreekDog Mar 2014 #240
"Meow-meow-meow-meow-meow-meow-white-meow?" dogknob Mar 2014 #225
Sorry to hear that. Losing a parent is awful regardless of politics. nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #258
LOL! Rex Mar 2014 #288
What is that in reference to? Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #289
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #59
Fear and anger are BFF's. bravenak Mar 2014 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #64
I agree from firsthand experience. Rex Mar 2014 #290
IMO, it's bigotry to lump groups of people together this way. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #5
Then you must consider every study to be bigoted and bigotry Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #7
It's not about my ideology. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #11
Not really. It's that you're using the fundies' cafeteria method of book review Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #13
Bullshit. Don't dare lump me in with fundamentalists and step the fuck off. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #57
Yes, I do. I have read your posts. Unless you change your ideology daily... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #87
Kindly back up your bullshit subject line with ONE example from the book where the author NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #88
Pretty angry there, The mask slips CreekDog Mar 2014 #163
Howdy partner! NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #166
:) nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #184
The author would rather you don't make up shit about his book. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #261
That wasn't directed at you (as you know), but you just can't stay away from me, can you? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #269
well... CreekDog Mar 2014 #239
Is there anything you can't justify? joeglow3 Mar 2014 #136
it's deep seated, not seeded. that one drives me nuts, LOL. bettyellen Mar 2014 #168
You are correct joeglow3 Mar 2014 #170
I know- I am a gardener, so the seeded thing doubly bugs me, ha ha. bettyellen Mar 2014 #171
Regarding the fundie cafeteria method... rrneck Mar 2014 #77
No, not really. In fact, fundies provide no proof except a fairy tale book.. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #85
Yes, really. rrneck Mar 2014 #90
I gave a synopsis on a book. You're asking me to type out the book for you here? Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #94
Did you read it? nt rrneck Mar 2014 #95
Of course I did. Why would I be posting the book if not? Are you going to? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #96
Then explain it. nt rrneck Mar 2014 #97
Re-read what I've said through here, then read the book. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #99
So you read it but you didn't understand it. rrneck Mar 2014 #106
I think she needs to read the book. I don't think she got it the first time. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #167
Yep. Just downloded it to kindle. rrneck Mar 2014 #179
Wow! Le Taz Hot Mar 2014 #100
Everything revolves around studies and statistics. So what exactly are you talking about? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #101
I thought it was pretty clear. Le Taz Hot Mar 2014 #104
This book is not a broad-brush of men. Just the opposite (imho). PotatoChip Mar 2014 #66
Thank you for a kind and reasoned response, and especially for advice for how to learn more. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #75
You're welcome. PotatoChip Mar 2014 #137
I agree. Sadly, the OP Subject Line is a Hot Mess and Misleading.... NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #91
Given the often vastly different motivations between those groups... Lizzie Poppet Mar 2014 #107
The word stereotyping was your input. brush Mar 2014 #156
Methinks he doth protest too much. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #187
His protest is a touch too vigorous. nt brush Mar 2014 #196
Yes. This thread is fascinating. It's the same little group of angry names. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #198
this is just silly noiretextatique Mar 2014 #175
The onus is on the OP author to speak in clear terms, and when called on it to edit in accordingly. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #178
aw, "we" just disappoint you so much, don't we? Skittles Mar 2014 #228
Now why do you want to be such a shiftan and not actually read what i wrote. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #229
LOL Skittles Mar 2014 #232
I haven't see you this angry since gun control was talked about after Newtown CreekDog Mar 2014 #236
Another CreekDog Character Attack. You'd think a host of GD would Skip Intro Mar 2014 #254
any search of your posts and "Obama" and/or "Trayvon" or "Martin" will show that CreekDog Mar 2014 #255
+100. n/t Skip Intro Mar 2014 #253
But we are talking about angry RWing men! How does that one obvious point Rex Mar 2014 #291
I don't understand lumping father's rights and men's rights in with polly7 Mar 2014 #8
The original post explained it - in common are, angry + WHITE + MALE nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #10
Men can't be angry for legitimate reasons that women are often angry about also? polly7 Mar 2014 #14
You're making a silly argument. Read the book. It covers all your questions... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #16
No thanks. polly7 Mar 2014 #20
Of course you won't. Anything that might threaten your world view is a threat Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #21
I'll question what I please. polly7 Mar 2014 #23
"You're silly"... NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #132
Silly, small and poor, apparently. polly7 Mar 2014 #133
Oddly enough... OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #38
Thanks for reviving my interest in the publication. defacto7 Mar 2014 #53
Please post where I said I have not read the book. I have finished reading the book. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #190
OK. OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #193
I have completed the book. Hey, I get it that you're angry. You don't need to display it Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #197
You really should stop ascribing motives to people. OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #205
I'm ascribing only what you have made amply clear in all your posts on this thread. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #208
Give me an example, then. OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #215
I will - every one of your posts in this thread. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #216
There is none. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #12
It's the stuff-I-don't-like conspiracy. That's the corellation. JVS Mar 2014 #15
Not really. Read the book. This man has spent a rather lengthy time working on this Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #17
The OP subject line misrepresents the book. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #80
+1 for subject line Go Vols Mar 2014 #231
Of course men have legitimate grievances in this society. The mistake many of them make nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #31
Did you happen to note... OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #46
Absolutely. I was only discussing one particular aspect. n/t nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #48
Oh FFS. polly7 Mar 2014 #65
I'm not trying to "ramp up" anything. Just giving my opinion like you did. nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #260
Are you seriously defending the Mens Rights sufrommich Mar 2014 #67
The Men's Rights Movement 'here'??? polly7 Mar 2014 #68
I meant "are you posting on DU and sufrommich Mar 2014 #69
You said 'here'. polly7 Mar 2014 #70
I think my post was pretty clear,as was yours claiming that the MRM sufrommich Mar 2014 #71
Your intent was clear, that's for sure. nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #73
You're behaving rather angry. Why? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #199
I'm not angry at all. polly7 Mar 2014 #235
Oooh, so this isn't angry on you. Wouldn't want to see angry then nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #241
Correct. nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #243
I'm very afraid. Very. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #244
Of what? polly7 Mar 2014 #245
I see you don't get sarcasm. Nite. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #246
Riiiiiiight. polly7 Mar 2014 #247
I didn't know that. Perhaps with good reason. As said, "where there's smoke there's fire." nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #192
I just got that book too. Very good stuff. Recursion Mar 2014 #18
It's very well researched and written. I'm considering giving it as gifts... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #19
I was bracing for it to be condescending, but he was very good Recursion Mar 2014 #22
Wasn't it? I was pleasantly surprised. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #28
Great Book. But you made up a Bigoted and Misleading OP Subject Line. And no link. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #76
I strongly urge that you read it. That will clarify the following for you: Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #93
Prove it with an example from the book. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #127
Gun rights are NOT some new phenomena. MicaelS Mar 2014 #24
The way they are behaving as if guns were prohibited, you betcha they are. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #26
Bigotry AgingAmerican Mar 2014 #25
Are you saying that I'm the author of this book? Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #27
I am saying that the OP is bigoted AgingAmerican Mar 2014 #29
"There was no American Dream for anyone but white males." nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #32
Up until 40-50 years ago? AgingAmerican Mar 2014 #36
So you deny that white American males have historically enjoyed tremendous unfair advantages? nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #41
No, I said the OP is bigoted AgingAmerican Mar 2014 #43
You're kidding me, right? The very fact that you are saying this is untrue.... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #194
Suuuure it does AgingAmerican Mar 2014 #248
You're pretending that white and male was not a privilege for most of the hiistory of the U.S. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #249
No, you are pretending AgingAmerican Mar 2014 #251
It seems rather like you're saying that anyone who is both male and white cannot possibly have Marr Mar 2014 #33
It's not that their frustrations are illegitimate, it's that they direct them at the wrong people nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #39
I read a really interesting article the other day - KitSileya Mar 2014 #74
Exactly. If wages were to be what it is, it wouldn't explain it or excuse it... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #195
Very well said! nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #257
Maybe you should read the book? Recursion Mar 2014 #42
How did you arrive at that? You are erroneous in at least some the following: Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #110
The Bell Curve employed "studies and statistics", too. Marr Mar 2014 #130
Um, not exactly. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #200
I know the Bell Curve was bullshit. Marr Mar 2014 #202
It was. This is not. In fact, the very studies employed by the angry anti-feminist male groups... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #209
Well, maybe I'll give it a read this week. Marr Mar 2014 #212
Good! Thanks. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #214
What solutions does Kimmell suggest? SunSeeker Mar 2014 #34
For starters, as in AA, the most important issue is acknowledging the problem... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #116
I wouldn't say it's zero, but it is small. SunSeeker Mar 2014 #120
The only solution is for awareness that there is a change, that life will not return Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #201
Oh they're aware there's a change. That's why they're angry. nt. SunSeeker Mar 2014 #219
If a post on a message board is the worst "bigotry" you've experienced this week - or this month - nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #37
I believe the Tea Party has always been right wing, even before Obama. ZombieHorde Mar 2014 #44
Read the book. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #115
If the people who read the book can't explain ZombieHorde Mar 2014 #160
+1 Go Vols Mar 2014 #230
What he seems to be skating around is one of the major reason for the anger Warpy Mar 2014 #51
No. Read the book. I keep getting people assuming they know the book without Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #113
It would help if you would answer people's questions. joeglow3 Mar 2014 #144
Thanks Warpy Mar 2014 #176
My white male privilege agrees with this post. westerebus Mar 2014 #129
I've not read this book, but... davidn3600 Mar 2014 #52
Nice analysis quaker bill Mar 2014 #63
Posts like this make DU worhtwhile. nt rrneck Mar 2014 #89
I agree Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #117
When you read the book, you'll find how well researched the thing is, and the incredible number of Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #108
The conclusions of this research seem focused towards one group of people davidn3600 Mar 2014 #224
I think there is more nuance in this short response My Good Babushka Mar 2014 #141
This illustrates it nicely.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #55
Indeed. The loss of the long-standing white male entitlement has given birth to rightwingerism... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #103
Trash, another broad brush Katashi_itto Mar 2014 #56
Downward mobility is fucking everyone over, and we need to do something about that eridani Mar 2014 #58
I totally agree. Thanks! nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #102
Alienation alone doesn't turn people into mass murderers. My Good Babushka Mar 2014 #62
It's not "alienation" per se. It's a loss of white male privilege and entitlement present since Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #98
Recent immigrants, from which huge swaths of the country are comprised, My Good Babushka Mar 2014 #123
The American caste system is changing and white right wing males are angry Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #152
That's not really in dispute My Good Babushka Mar 2014 #162
The only ones exclusing themselves from society, are the angry white males Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #183
I read some of the reviews My Good Babushka Mar 2014 #188
The solution is awareness of what these angry groups are doing, why they're doing it, and what Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #203
Sarah, I think a lot of it may be the loss of jobs by so many white working class men.. whathehell Mar 2014 #140
I think it's definitely part of it. A lot of it has to do with women, blacks, gay rights, and the Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #147
And they're all living in my community. Baitball Blogger Mar 2014 #72
How lucky! Well, to be honest, I think I must've gotten quite a few of "yours" Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #78
We are pawns in a greater game and always have been LittleBlue Mar 2014 #109
YES!!! Thank you. That's why I encourage everyone to read this book... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #111
Which is why 62% of white men voted for Romney.... YoungDemCA Mar 2014 #119
god, that is a depressing stat. we need to make inroads with these people and jobs would do it... bettyellen Mar 2014 #165
Which is one huge reason the Rs have opposed any action to create decent jobs. Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2014 #282
True, god forbid we dig the USA out of the hole they created. bettyellen Mar 2014 #283
Especially when they have a huge percentage of Americans believing that it was the Dems Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2014 #284
yep, just like Christie did with the GWB- fuck up services and blame a Dem... bettyellen Mar 2014 #285
Gotta hand it to them, they know what works and they aren't afraid to use it. Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2014 #286
I saw the same thing locally- the campaign manager for a mayoral candidate called the opponent a bettyellen Mar 2014 #287
That is an example of the sort of thing that causes me to lose faith in humanity. Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2014 #293
That mayoral candidate tried to hire me away (I was volunteering for the other guy) and offered me bettyellen Mar 2014 #294
I was going to ask some questions about this book Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #121
It's vast and I'm here to introduce the book, not to teach you a class on it. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #126
Just read the book Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #161
The right to own firearms is a Civil Right enshrined in the Constitution (Bill of Rights). NutmegYankee Mar 2014 #122
I'm not discussing gun rights. This book discusses the mad popularity of gun rights now Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #124
No, actually, it doesn't. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #135
He does go to a gun show and interview the dude manning the KKK booth. OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #151
You have not read it, but are telling others what the book is or is not about. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #204
Understand. NutmegYankee Mar 2014 #142
Funny how most of the teabag facebook postings I see itsrobert Mar 2014 #125
You checked their gender? lol Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #131
Nice post. YoungDemCA Mar 2014 #134
Koch brothers money. CanonRay Mar 2014 #128
Amen. Koch ga$$$$oline fuels the angry white male groups and propaganda Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #159
Gun nuts and MRA's are afraid Ohio Joe Mar 2014 #138
Oh yes. Terrified. Yes, get the book at the library, or buy it. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #158
It's also an excellent explanation of what's holding us back as a country. nt MrScorpio Mar 2014 #146
Exactly! It's the 1st book that has explained it so well. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #157
The people pushing back on this are the people whose ears are burning. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #148
Yes, did you notice? I have to go back over the posts and take note of who said what Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #154
Beg your pardon? OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #164
Actually, what I have said is modest and mild compared to what the book touches on Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #206
You're like a dog with a bone. OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #211
I'm just someone who won't get pushed around by anyone. You don't like it, don't like it. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #213
... OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #217
You're in an anger group, or you're silly, or it's your ideocracy. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #221
I'm astounded that you tried to reach out to her... OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #222
looks interesting, thanks. we need more men voting Dem instead of against their best interests. bettyellen Mar 2014 #149
Yes we do. Thank God for the awesome lib men, of every color, religion, etc. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #153
Angry people scare me shenmue Mar 2014 #155
I wouldn't lump fathers' rights supporters in there TransitJohn Mar 2014 #169
Are you saying the writer of the book did a bad thing? Then please read the book. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #182
No, I'm saying TransitJohn Mar 2014 #265
The book itself sets out to prove that mens' rights, fathers' rights, teabag, right wing extremist Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #268
Fathers' rights groups aren't anger groups, they're parents' rights groups TransitJohn Mar 2014 #272
I wouldn't say that. I'd say that black fathers' groups are parent relationship improvement groups Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #273
Then you'd be wrong TransitJohn Mar 2014 #274
So are you saying men's rights and fathers' rights groups are not really anti-feminist? Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #275
Keep lumping and stereotyping TransitJohn Mar 2014 #276
I asked a question which only required a yes or no response. I got no answer. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #277
Please read the book and discover what a horrible person you are. Throd Mar 2014 #278
The reply above yours has got to be the most racist statement I've ever seen on this board. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #279
I'm not touching it with a ten foot pole TransitJohn Mar 2014 #281
I've heard of this book. Seems pretty good to me. AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #174
Thanks! I believe one person has a problem with the OP title... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #181
I've conceded that there is a language barrier here, and I apologize. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #177
Sorry. The subject line explains the book, and it cannot be changed. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #180
I'll say this, and you can correct me if I'm wrong. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #186
Here, I'm going to suggest the better subject line that I think you'll agree is not offensive: NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #189
That's not what he discusses in the book. There were Reagan Democrats, and there are currently Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #207
I was hoping for examples of "aggrieved entitlement"... Zenlitened Mar 2014 #185
That's interesting. OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #191
+1 redqueen Mar 2014 #218
After watching the reaction of those in anger groups, I wonder... Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #210
"watching the reaction of those in anger groups, I wonder..." I want you to read a book: NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #220
Those look useful. OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #223
Indeed, they are. But the best tool from the author, however, isn't provided free of charge. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #226
The more I read from the book the more I see that YOU are the problem. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #227
:) Puzzledtraveller Mar 2014 #238
Then you have the wrong book, clearly. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #242
Educate this DUer on how you know their profession better than they joeglow3 Mar 2014 #250
I'm guessing it's because they scored low on South Park's TMI index: Initech Mar 2014 #233
Including "fathers rights" in this discussion is problematic ecstatic Mar 2014 #252
The book includes fathers' rights as one of the offshoots of the anti-woman themes of angry white Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #263
On wages and downward mobility- Lunacee_2013 Mar 2014 #262
Yes, it makes it all come full circle. You're right Right wing fuel is at the bottom of the Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #264
No ruling class goes without a fight. WinkyDink Mar 2014 #266
So true. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #267
Regarding "fathers' rights" redqueen Mar 2014 #270
Thank you, redqueen. Super informative article. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #271
Male menopause and an economy so mean... Orsino Mar 2014 #280
Interesting observation - some here seem to miss your title in the OP! Rex Mar 2014 #292
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What fueled right wingers...