Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democracyinkind

(4,015 posts)
8. I don't think that this is about the people
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 08:35 AM
Mar 2014

IMHO Russia would try to hold on to the Crimea even if the people there were all French.

Strategically, the Crimea is essential to Russia. They can not afford to lose it as it is the hinge of its force projection in the near and middle east, Mediterranean and Africa.

The Soviets "gave" Crimea to the Ukraine because it didn't matter as it was a deal between friends in the Warsaw pact.

Even after Ukrainian independence, Russian force projection in Crimea has always bested that of the Ukraine. The Ukrainian fleet has been dependent on Russia even after independence and that has only begun to change in the last decade. Russia has a grip on the Ukrainian navy and on most forces in the Ukraine even if those are nominally independent. What little force the Ukraine has in the Crimea that is truly loyal is no match for Russian capabilities.

In short, holding on to the Crimea is considered essential to Russian national security. As Americans, we have a good idea of what that means.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Let them secede&quo...»Reply #8