Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

markpkessinger

(8,935 posts)
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 02:04 PM Mar 2014

My response to a truly execrable NY Times Op-Ed by Arthur Brooks . . . [View all]

. . . head of the American Enterprise Institute.

Here is the text of my comment:

Mark Kessinger [font color="gray"]New York, NY 2 hours ago[/font]

The suggestion that most middle- and working-class folks are 'envious' of the very wealthy is an outrageous insult. Nobody is begrudging anybody's success, nor do they covet what the very wealthy have. But many of the very wealthy seem to have lost sight of the fact that nobody succeeds alone. What people want is the ability to make a decent living for themselves and their families. They want a real chance to get ahead. They want job security. And when the businesses who employ them enjoy large increases in profitability, they want their contribution to that increased profitability to be fairly reflected in their wages or salaries.

In any case, the prevailing emotion is not 'envy,' but rather bitter resentment. People resent that this tiny percentage of folks who have succeeded so spectacularly have used the fruits of that success to undermine the formerly robust commons this country once enjoyed. They resent that they use that money to lobby legislators to tear away at the social safety net and to block a long-overdue and very modest rise in the minimum wage.

An economic system must work for everyone. A system that enables a relative handful to hoard ever larger sums of wealth while everybody else is left to divvy up an ever declining remainder is unsustainable.

Finally, if anything is feeding this resentment, it is the smug, self-satisfied pronouncements of the 1% about what is "healthy" for society as a whole!


And here is an excerpt of Brooks' Op-Ed:

[font size=4]The Downside of Inciting Envy[/font]

[font size=3]Arthur C. Brooks[/font]

< . . . . >

Unsurprisingly, psychologists have found that envy pushes down life satisfaction and depresses well-being. Envy is positively correlated with depression and neuroticism, and the hostility it breeds may actually make us sick. Recent work suggests that envy can help explain our complicated relationship with social media: it often leads to destructive “social comparison,” which decreases happiness. To understand this, just picture yourself scrolling through your ex’s wedding photos.

My own data analysis confirms a strong link between economic envy and unhappiness. In 2008, Gallup asked a large sample of Americans whether they were “angry that others have more than they deserve.” People who strongly disagreed with that statement — who were not envious, in other words — were almost five times more likely to say they were “very happy” about their lives than people who strongly agreed. Even after I controlled for income, education, age, family status, religion and politics, this pattern persisted.

It’s safe to conclude that a national shift toward envy would be toxic for American culture.

< . . . . >

. . . [W]e must recognize that fomenting bitterness over income differences may be powerful politics, but it injures our nation. We need aspirational leaders willing to do the hard work of uniting Americans around an optimistic vision in which anyone can earn his or her success. This will never happen when we vilify the rich or give up on the poor.

< . . . . >
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could not agree more! marew Mar 2014 #1
Your post brought Robinson Crusoe to mind. snort Mar 2014 #16
+10 n/t whathehell Mar 2014 #26
Your comment is excellent! Thank you for not letting that garbage editorial go unchallenged! scarletwoman Mar 2014 #2
Who envies wealth? AceWheeler Mar 2014 #3
Thank you for that adjunct! n/t markpkessinger Mar 2014 #5
Thank you. jsr Mar 2014 #4
kick!! nt Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #6
Thanks! lunatica Mar 2014 #7
K&R very well said, thanks for doing that (n/t) brett_jv Mar 2014 #8
Thank you for your clear-headed, logical response. senseandsensibility Mar 2014 #9
The uber-wealthy regard the lack of worship by the masses as a mortal insult MrScorpio Mar 2014 #10
Well said. Here are my two cents worth. McCamy Taylor Mar 2014 #11
Your post is excellent! n/t markpkessinger Mar 2014 #12
Nice response. zeemike Mar 2014 #13
Brooks seems to think . . . markpkessinger Mar 2014 #14
You did us all proud with that rebuttal. Curmudgeoness Mar 2014 #15
Thank you for speaking up. No Vested Interest Mar 2014 #17
A very good clear response. stage left Mar 2014 #18
It isn't just a matter of envy. And envy is understandable on the part of the impoverished. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #19
True, and I agree with President Clinton. NaturalHigh Mar 2014 #22
Great post, JD! Enthusiast Mar 2014 #24
Brooks was a blatant propagandist in that op-ed. So transparent. nt stillwaiting Mar 2014 #20
I have never begrudged anybody being rich. NaturalHigh Mar 2014 #21
OMG you nail it Mr. Kessinger Skittles Mar 2014 #23
My first thought was "Why is Nemo's dad such an asshole?" Orrex Mar 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My response to a truly ex...