Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Russia is invading another country on completely trumped up pretext" [View all]Rex
(65,616 posts)111. And of course nobody said Russia is justified in invading.
NOTICE how he keeps pretending somebody did! All the while playing CYA for Iraq and all the idiots that voted for the IWR. Nothing worse then someone that can't be on the level with everyone else. They can never be honest or forthcoming.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
153 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Russia is invading another country on completely trumped up pretext" [View all]
dixiegrrrrl
Mar 2014
OP
Exactly. I think his inner-radical is still alive, somehwere in there. But he sold out years ago.
reformist2
Mar 2014
#43
I know, have you seen the attacks on Democrats here we were so accustomed to from
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#120
You didnt know anything. You guessed. No one knew because no one had been there.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#140
Are you trying to justify his vote? Because Bush didnt hold up his end of the bargain? Really? nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#144
There wasnt any evidence to be cooked. IWR and UN SecRes 1441 were passed to try to get evidence via
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#49
Exactly and perfectly right. I break this all down in this article I wrote back in 2009...
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#69
Facts matter. The actual text of IWR matters. The fact that the UN Sec Council's 15 countries
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#138
Such 'cooking of evidence' would be a huge crime, that crime was never prosecuted or
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#62
And that is something I talk about semi-regularly. But again, in the context of this discussion...
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#66
So, you are saying that Russia, China, Syria, and the other 15 countries that didnt know and voted
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#74
That is not an answer. If you think those countries had vested interests that motivated their vote
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#86
Yes "Denizen of the morass" explains away Putin's war crime of an unprovoked war of aggression.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#91
Nope, you should listen to yourself. You are justifying an unprovoked war of aggression in Ukraine
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#139
Assuming we accept all of that, how does that justify a Russian war crime? nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#143
You seriously think war is a reasonable reaction to Russia reinstalling Yanukovich or anyone else?
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#129
He's such an idiot. He doesn't even realize how ironic that is coming out of his mouth?
Democracyinkind
Mar 2014
#22
So Russia's unprovoked war of aggression is OK because some of you think Kerry voted to give Bush
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#27
It's not "OK" it's just that we don't have a moral leg to stand on to criticize it
Fumesucker
Mar 2014
#30
Sure we do. We have a moral reason to criticize it. As you said, it's not OK. (nt)
PosterChild
Mar 2014
#41
First, we don't think Kerry voted to give Bush the power to wage an unprovoked and unjustified war,
A Simple Game
Mar 2014
#60
No, he didn't. I know some of you are heavily invested in that belief, but it isn't true.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#64
I expect that kind of superficial analysis from the Freepers, not from DUers. The analysis is here
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#73
I know you are so invested in an incorrect version of events you dont want to know the truth.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#141
I'm the one consistent here. You are the one trying to assert a war crime is ok in one instance and
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#142
LMAO, exactly. Because of that a war crime by Russia/Putin now is OK, of course.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#61
How long after Iraq do we get to start using diplomacy to stop wars of aggression?
NuclearDem
Mar 2014
#34
Not to mention that the guy we have as President was not in favor of that war. Why should he
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#39
Oh he can and indeed must protest, that isn't the gist of the dialog here though.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#134
The fact that the pot is calling the kettle black doesn't mean that the kettle isn't black.
1monster
Mar 2014
#35
Excellent way of putting it, even if one temporarily accepts the premise of the OP. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#42
I'm confused...do people think Putin is a saint or some representative of democracy?
Rex
Mar 2014
#116
The irony is that progressives realize the hypocrisy of such statements, the republicans and right
lostincalifornia
Mar 2014
#36
I think many progressives are missing the greater irony. I think it is much more important to be
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#54
because I addressed Kerry's remarks does not mean I limit hpocrisy to just Bush.
dixiegrrrrl
Mar 2014
#112
But..but...we got involved for their own good...wellll...kinda...maybe...never mind.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#122
The ironies and hypocrisies seem to abound here. I think you start from the biggest crime and work
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#78
It's twilight zone time on DU with huge support for an unprovoked war of aggression...
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#100
I think pretty much everyone here will agree that what Bush did was a war crime but
Drale
Mar 2014
#82
Crimea was a part of Russia for quite some time before Khrushchev (who was Ukrainian) gave it
LisaL
Mar 2014
#85
Just because you write sarcasm under it, does not mean it isn't true.
Donald Ian Rankin
Mar 2014
#145
I'm not a supporter of Russia's action here, but Kerry saying that makes me cringe
penultimate
Mar 2014
#151