Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
19. It isn't just a matter of envy. And envy is understandable on the part of the impoverished.
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 05:24 PM
Mar 2014

As Clinton used to say, most Americans believe that if you play by the rules, you should be able to make a decent living through your work and skill.

Too many of the 1%ers of today either inherited their wealth from some individual who made a fortune climbing the ladder while kicking honest, working people in the butt (think Rockefeller, Morgan, nearly all the 19th century moguls), breaking ethical rules and the law and corruption (the history of the corruption of the 19th century moguls is astounding) or made their money by kicking honest, working people in the butt (think Rockefeller, Morgan, nearly all the 19th century moguls), breaking ethical rules and the law and corruption (the history of the corruption of the 19th century moguls is astounding). This goes for all the takeover crowd who bought viable American businesses or factories, sold the guts of the factories to China or some other third world country and are now reveling in their wealth.

A few of the hedge fund managers and Wall Street brokers and some of our bankers come to mind. They buy their way out of criminal convictions with "campaign donations" to politicians. (That used to be called corruption, but today we call that corporate free speech.)

Take a guy who is in his late 50s, early 60s, has worked all his life in a respected trade and now finds himself out of a job. He never cheated. He never shirked. He is impoverished. And Congress won't even vote to continue his meager unemployment check. It's a bit late to invest in a new career, especially when jobs in almost any career other than those that require a youthful, strong back and legs are non-existent for the over-50s crowd.

The problem is not the envy. The problem is the greed on the part of those who so need to blame their victims. The victims of the greed of the wealthy have no control. They have no representation in government. Most of them don't even have a union.

This talk about envy is a useless attempt to justify extreme greed and hubris.

Things will change. They always do. Whether they change so as to preserve some of the privileges that the wealthy now enjoy is entirely up to those wealthy people who are now blaming their victims and who do not see their own faults.

Is it really so difficult to understand that a homeless mother of three has a right to be envious of a mother with three homes?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Could not agree more! marew Mar 2014 #1
Your post brought Robinson Crusoe to mind. snort Mar 2014 #16
+10 n/t whathehell Mar 2014 #26
Your comment is excellent! Thank you for not letting that garbage editorial go unchallenged! scarletwoman Mar 2014 #2
Who envies wealth? AceWheeler Mar 2014 #3
Thank you for that adjunct! n/t markpkessinger Mar 2014 #5
Thank you. jsr Mar 2014 #4
kick!! nt Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #6
Thanks! lunatica Mar 2014 #7
K&R very well said, thanks for doing that (n/t) brett_jv Mar 2014 #8
Thank you for your clear-headed, logical response. senseandsensibility Mar 2014 #9
The uber-wealthy regard the lack of worship by the masses as a mortal insult MrScorpio Mar 2014 #10
Well said. Here are my two cents worth. McCamy Taylor Mar 2014 #11
Your post is excellent! n/t markpkessinger Mar 2014 #12
Nice response. zeemike Mar 2014 #13
Brooks seems to think . . . markpkessinger Mar 2014 #14
You did us all proud with that rebuttal. Curmudgeoness Mar 2014 #15
Thank you for speaking up. No Vested Interest Mar 2014 #17
A very good clear response. stage left Mar 2014 #18
It isn't just a matter of envy. And envy is understandable on the part of the impoverished. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #19
True, and I agree with President Clinton. NaturalHigh Mar 2014 #22
Great post, JD! Enthusiast Mar 2014 #24
Brooks was a blatant propagandist in that op-ed. So transparent. nt stillwaiting Mar 2014 #20
I have never begrudged anybody being rich. NaturalHigh Mar 2014 #21
OMG you nail it Mr. Kessinger Skittles Mar 2014 #23
My first thought was "Why is Nemo's dad such an asshole?" Orrex Mar 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My response to a truly ex...»Reply #19