Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "We will not tolerate the suppression of 10 million ethnically the same as us across our borders" [View all]FarCenter
(19,429 posts)22. Putin probably applied the Powell Doctrine
The Powell Doctrine states that a list of questions all have to be answered affirmatively before military action is taken by the United States:
1.Is a vital national security interest threatened?
2.Do we have a clear attainable objective?
3.Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?
4.Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?
5.Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?
6.Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?
7.Is the action supported by the American people?
8.Do we have genuine broad international support?
1.Is a vital national security interest threatened?
2.Do we have a clear attainable objective?
3.Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?
4.Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?
5.Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?
6.Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?
7.Is the action supported by the American people?
8.Do we have genuine broad international support?
Except in that in the case of Russia, 8 does not apply, since Russia never has broad international support.
Putin has therefore applied overwhelming force to attain a limited objective.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"We will not tolerate the suppression of 10 million ethnically the same as us across our borders" [View all]
stevenleser
Mar 2014
OP
I doubt Putin will invade nations where Russia has not had historical interests but
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#27
There are neo-Nazis in every country including the US. You can post photos of them here too.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#6
All the comparisons to Hitler (and so soon!), means the pro-war crowd is losing the audience.
reformist2
Mar 2014
#8
Who is pro-war? Not me. I am not only against a military response, I am against Russia's military
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#11
As I said, I am the anti-war person here and you are the war cheerleader. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#14
Well said. I think most liberals are against military agression and a military response to such
pampango
Mar 2014
#15
Nope, not losing it. A lot of folks are making that comparison now. Because it fits. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#12
*Chechnya need not apply to the above statement. We will suppress the fk out of you. /nm
Ohio4theWin
Mar 2014
#16
when the comparison comes from a former Russian President then it's not a warmonger
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#26
Jeez, was just thinking this. Russia's doing its action overtly while we just do it economically
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#24
A lot of people are now comparing invasion of Ukraine to the Anschluss of Austria, because it fits
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#29
Yes, a lot are. But the similarities here are so strong, that can easily be ruled out. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#32
No, it's not. It's based on the nearly identical statements and actions of Hitler and Putin in these
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#37
I am openly arguing AGAINST war. That doesnt change the similarity of these events.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#36
I'm making comparisons between the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the Anschluss of Austria
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#39