General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)On the excuse that Kerry really hated the Iraq invasion because he wanted diplomacy [View all]
The issue of Kerry and the Iraq War has come up recently as he tells Putin to stop invading other countries. Those who defend John Kerry's vote in 2002 for the authorization to invade Iraq argue the following:
That Kerry really disagreed with the invasion of Iraq in 2003 because Kerry wanted diplomacy first.
But this argument falls flat when we see what Kerry said in a debate during Howard Dean two months after the invasion (May, 2003), even after stating in the same sentence he thought diplomacy was important:
"KERRY: I would have preferred if we had given diplomacy a greater opportunity, but I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the president made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him."
http://www.ontheissues.org/Archive/Dems_Columbia_SC_John_Kerry.htm
Kerry apologists pretend that his position was something like, (WTF, Bush, I told you to use diplomacy and you didn't! I do not like the fact that you invaded Iraq you impulsive impatient you!"
But Kerry supported the invasion. His desire for diplomacy did not cause him to withdraw support for it.
Kerry screwd up big time.
It is no wonder that independent fact-checkers have rejected Kerry's revisionist attempt to wash his hands.
http://www.factcheck.org/2013/09/kerry-spins-his-record-on-iraq/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/sep/13/john-kerry/secretary-state-john-kerry-says-senator-he-opposed/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2013/09/10/kerrys-claim-that-he-opposed-bushs-invasion-of-iraq/