Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The reason we're still fighting a pitched battle over the IWR: Revisionist History [View all]neverforget
(9,445 posts)65. It's a simple question that you can clarify or you can continue to avoid
answering the question.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The reason we're still fighting a pitched battle over the IWR: Revisionist History [View all]
cali
Mar 2014
OP
Ironically, better politics would've been listening to people who knew what they were talking about
Hippo_Tron
Mar 2014
#76
Jeez Pro. Sorry I asked you a question that you thought was a gotcha question.
neverforget
Mar 2014
#60
You didn't know. Guessing right on a 50-50 Boolean proposition doesn't mean 'you knew' nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#77
WMD was a really stupid term used by Bush to conflate chemical/biological and nuclear weapons
Hippo_Tron
Mar 2014
#73
You've highlighted the problem with the OP and those who agree with her. Revisionist history. They
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#78
it reminds me of Iran-Contra: when Steadman Fagoth said 10,000 Miskito had been
MisterP
Mar 2014
#38
They made a calculated bet that Iraq War II would go as smoothly as Iraq War I. How wrong they were!
reformist2
Mar 2014
#39
You and I and millions of others weren't fooled but the defense for falling for the neocon
neverforget
Mar 2014
#64