Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House suggests Social Security cuts remain 'on the table' [View all]PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)2. DoD cuts
DoD IS the table.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hopefully Rmoney will run again so there's a better choice in the caboodle ...err not!
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#82
Agreed. But keep in mind that if they're IN our tent, we can work on winning them over to the left.
beerandjesus
Mar 2014
#131
bwhahaah. concern over this is clearly legitimate as the administration is the one
cali
Mar 2014
#36
So the White House and Obama are liars? Or are these words from the White House invisable to you?
Autumn
Mar 2014
#65
It was an official bargaining chip. One the republicans hadn't asked for, he offered it.
Autumn
Mar 2014
#80
Why? So he can brag that he offered to cut SS, but the GOP was too leftist to take the offer?
Marr
Mar 2014
#109
One problem with this logic is it fails to account for the fact that nobody wants to cut
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#136
I hope no one here fell for the, "but it's not in the proposed budget therefore it must be off the
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#9
Or... we need to find the person with ODS who claims cuts are on the table:
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2014
#18
And just because it's not "on the table" doesnt mean it's "off the table". nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#55
Engangered species: "actual Democrat" ...Sanders is more of a Dem than the majority of Dems IMO.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#84
You do realize very few folks will be impacted, and the amount those few might have
Hoyt
Mar 2014
#57
I see no reason to trump up criticism of Obama. Maybe you guys should find something that matters.
Hoyt
Mar 2014
#59
They honestly seem to believe that they've transformed what a party is...
woo me with science
Mar 2014
#79
What part of multiple "senior administration officials made clear" don't you understand.
Divernan
Mar 2014
#50
I'm just suggesting that we take speculation, reading between the lines, and vague references
pinto
Mar 2014
#52
And they wonder why Dems have a "meh" attitude vis a vis the midterms. n/t
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#49
It is not my intention to offend the Radiant One, nor his patient, persecuted followers.
sibelian
Mar 2014
#122
I have written him on this and he replies politely with a lot of clap trap about
Cleita
Mar 2014
#73
I thought progressives were the only ones thrown under the bus but Dems are there too.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#81
Dem Voters will be blamed when TPP & Keystone XL are passed after Mid-Term Elections
KoKo
Mar 2014
#111
With Obama now the king of deportation ...don't expect a lot of Latino votes either.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#114
But hey Ukraine have a free billion on us! Let us know if you need more!
workinclasszero
Mar 2014
#106