Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

shanti

(21,799 posts)

17. No

Reply to Packerowner740 (Reply #14)

Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:52 PM

Mar 2014

Some were before the heist, some up to the time of it. Supposedly, one of the coins was specially made by someone at the mint, and it was never intended for it to leave the mint, so there's that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gold Coins [View all] packman Mar 2014 OP

In this case, the bank is the U.S. Mint. Common Sense Party Mar 2014 #1

The old adage 'possession is 9/10s of the law' applies here. former9thward Mar 2014 #2

I agree. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #25

I thought I had read in one of the threads that some of the coins Packerowner740 Mar 2014 #3

ALL of the coins from the heist should be dated before the heist pinboy3niner Mar 2014 #7

I think I had that backwards Packerowner740 Mar 2014 #14

No shanti Mar 2014 #17

They'll likely get a finders fee - maybe 10%? cbdo2007 Mar 2014 #4

All I know is PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #5

While I accept the premise customerserviceguy Mar 2014 #28

One way or another, I bet this couple ends up protecting their find in court Auggie Mar 2014 #6

Nope. They would have to prove it's the same gold that was stolen, which they can't. Shrike47 Mar 2014 #8

I was thinking along the same lines. Lex Mar 2014 #15

Good point, but at least one of these coins is unique tkmorris Mar 2014 #16

# 1 rule of finding treasure safeinOhio Mar 2014 #9

I wondered at the time why they were blabbing so much NightWatcher Mar 2014 #11

Same goes for winning the lottery 1000words Mar 2014 #33

So either the bank gets it all, or the US/state governments takes half in income taxes. Nice. reformist2 Mar 2014 #10

I'll take the half ($5 million) and let the government take the other half. riderinthestorm Mar 2014 #32

I read a very detailed explanation this a.m. YarnAddict Mar 2014 #12

Total speculation. former9thward Mar 2014 #18

I think you're incorrect, just based on precedent. Chan790 Mar 2014 #20

Are all the coins Double Eagles? former9thward Mar 2014 #22

The point is there is precedent that the Mint gets to claim possession on stolen currency... Chan790 Mar 2014 #23

If they do make a claim that is a lesson. former9thward Mar 2014 #24

If Jamie Dimon had found them, the fed would pay him to keep them. Orrex Mar 2014 #19

I hope that they have a good alibi Orrex Mar 2014 #13

I don't see anyone digging up contemporary articles closer to home, at the time mulsh Mar 2014 #21

hmmm ... CountAllVotes Mar 2014 #26

Coins do not have serial numbers.... Uben Mar 2014 #27

That is true CountAllVotes Mar 2014 #29

Okay... Uben Mar 2014 #30

The coins pictured have been graded CountAllVotes Mar 2014 #34

ZThis is why you never reveal a find like this. Just slowly sell items one at a time as needed. TeamPooka Mar 2014 #31

If the bank's funds at the time were insured and they collected on it Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #35