Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aikoaiko

(34,213 posts)
66. And the jury results are in...
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 07:22 AM
Mar 2014


AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Wed Mar 5, 2014, 06:56 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Derp.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4607171

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

I vaccinate my kids and feel strongly about that, so I'm on HuckleB's side of this, but responding to posters with "derp" is rude and disruptive, and he's done it twice in this thread so far. He's developed a bullying style and seems to start these threads to entice people to bully. I think a hide might send a message to talk about vaccines and other science issues in a less disruptive way.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Mar 5, 2014, 07:04 AM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's a childish response , but not his worthy IMO
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: While "Derp" may not be the most enlightened response, it is hardly worth hiding. It may be preferable for the alerter to simply walk away from this discussion.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Again, knee-jerk reaction from someone who may not have thought out their post. It's not offensive. It's just not thought out.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: derp
A simple, undefined reply when an ignorant comment or action is made. Brought to life in the South Park series, when Mr. Derp made a guest apperance at South Park Elementary as the chef for a day, followed by hitting himself in the head with a hammer and exclaiming "Derp!"

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds like this... Rex Mar 2014 #1
Indeed! -eom- HuckleB Mar 2014 #2
Not true. I used to be, if not an ANTI-vaxxer, I was a vaccine skeptic. Common Sense Party Mar 2014 #3
Do you have Proloquo2go? Blanks Mar 2014 #9
He uses it at school, but he's not very interested in it. nt Common Sense Party Mar 2014 #15
My daughter is severely autistic... Blanks Mar 2014 #21
Your story is fairly normal as far 1awake Mar 2014 #13
Yeah, I don't know if it's the norm, either. But to categorically say that Common Sense Party Mar 2014 #16
I can usually tell... 3catwoman3 Mar 2014 #4
Sounds like there is a big difference between as some folks have called them a vaccine-skeptic vs stevenleser Mar 2014 #67
This isn't just anti-vaccine. ZombieHorde Mar 2014 #5
+1 villager Mar 2014 #6
Exactly. -eom- HuckleB Mar 2014 #10
yup. La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2014 #40
They're immunized (cue rimshot) against contrary information. nt Deep13 Mar 2014 #7
LOL. nt La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2014 #42
It doesn't sound like the study shows any such thing. Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #8
Or they just are not open to actual information. HuckleB Mar 2014 #11
. Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #20
You do understand what the term "preliminary research" means, right? HuckleB Mar 2014 #24
Yes I do. Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #27
No, I haven't. HuckleB Mar 2014 #30
Lol! You have no idea what my knowledge or opinions Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #36
Actually, I do. HuckleB Mar 2014 #37
Wow. You're stalking my recs Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #47
Wow! You're making baseless assumptions. HuckleB Mar 2014 #49
Likewise. Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #54
Awwww. I'm sorry that intellectual honestly is not your thing. HuckleB Mar 2014 #56
Likewise. Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #58
Derp. HuckleB Mar 2014 #59
I don't think my intellect is up to addressing this final argument of yours. Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #60
You've offered intellect? HuckleB Mar 2014 #61
Well certainly nothing to match the caliber of "derp". Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #62
Ah, so you've offered nothing. HuckleB Mar 2014 #63
All woo secures itself by demanding it's believers cut themselves off from reality. chrisa Mar 2014 #12
I heard a little discussion about this on NPR. redqueen Mar 2014 #14
Same with some creationists sakabatou Mar 2014 #17
The Panic Virus, by Seth Mnookin WilliamPitt Mar 2014 #18
+1 HuckleB Mar 2014 #25
There is a large group of people that don't trust big pharma... Blanks Mar 2014 #19
Problem with your theory jeff47 Mar 2014 #23
As dangerous as I feared? Blanks Mar 2014 #29
We don't have to play "what-if" jeff47 Mar 2014 #35
I've also seen studies to this effect about global warming and creationism. DanTex Mar 2014 #22
I'm guessing it would hold true for most anti-science positions. HuckleB Mar 2014 #26
I'm not against vaccines. I am mistrustful of pharma companies Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #28
There's far more oversight there than in most areas. HuckleB Mar 2014 #31
Pharmaceutical companies are notorious for their misdeeds. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #33
That's your response? HuckleB Mar 2014 #38
What, do you need me to list their misdeeds (which you already know anyhow)? Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #39
In other words, you have no actual concerns about vaccines, but... HuckleB Mar 2014 #41
Oh good grief. I already said I'm not against vaccines per se, but against pharma companies Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #43
Yes, you've repeated that pointless cliche. HuckleB Mar 2014 #45
It is a cliche to you. It's reality to me. I don't trust pharma corporations nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #46
It's a preconceived notion to you. HuckleB Mar 2014 #50
No, it isn't. It's something I've witnessed and read about in depth. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #52
Derp. HuckleB Mar 2014 #53
And the jury results are in... aikoaiko Mar 2014 #66
Yeah, I had one of those howling religious fanatics in my exam room once, bringing his poor Aristus Mar 2014 #32
du rec. xchrom Mar 2014 #34
Same thing with trying to make ReThugs believe in C limate Change. Just makes them honker down. Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #44
Yes, but according to Anti-vaxxers, you can't trust most studies. n/t hughee99 Mar 2014 #48
That's why public health laws mandate vaccination for public school attendance Warpy Mar 2014 #51
People forget that the vaccine safety movement sprang up in connection with the old DPT vaccine, pnwmom Mar 2014 #55
FFS. HuckleB Mar 2014 #57
Your OP was nothing but your usual meme. What else do you ever talk about? pnwmom Mar 2014 #64
And then you go to the usual unverifiable claims routine. HuckleB Mar 2014 #65
And, as usual, you call me a liar. pnwmom Mar 2014 #69
I'm saying you almost always offer unverifiable stuff. HuckleB Mar 2014 #70
What a crock. You only read posts about vaccines so you have no idea what I post. n/t pnwmom Mar 2014 #71
Actually, I do. HuckleB Mar 2014 #73
Steven Novella Offers A Better Portrayal Of The Study And Its Conclusions HuckleB Mar 2014 #68
Too many idiots are still opting out here in Texas. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #72
It's bad all over, I guess. HuckleB Mar 2014 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»According to a New Study,...»Reply #66