Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: An important clarification from Russia Today News. [View all]another_liberal
(8,821 posts)34. At least someone had the courage to not just unquestioningly fall into line . . .
At least someone had the courage to not just unquestioningly fall into line with the overthrow of a democratically elected head of state and government of another sovereign nation. We should be thanking people like Glenn Greenwald, not slandering their reputations.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I doubt we will ever know. But we know they have bases, there is a fleet based there,
jtuck004
Mar 2014
#7
Far too often we believe just about anything the faces on our televisions tell us to believe.
another_liberal
Mar 2014
#22
No, but they certainly should not consort and give them executive branch positions
newthinking
Mar 2014
#12
When it gets to the point of justifying a military incursion into a sovereign nation
BainsBane
Mar 2014
#10
Crimea is considered and legally an autonomous region and has it's own parliment
newthinking
Mar 2014
#16
Autonomous regions don't get to invite armed foreign troops to patrol the country
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2014
#27
The part where the NYT excuses thousands of Russian soldiers taking over
Pretzel_Warrior
Mar 2014
#9
That is the key question. There is no doubt that Russian troops are allowed in Crimea - that's where
pampango
Mar 2014
#20
No. My point is that I'm sure we have the right to protect the base using troops within the base
pampango
Mar 2014
#35
At least someone had the courage to not just unquestioningly fall into line . . .
another_liberal
Mar 2014
#34
Yanukovych 'overthrew' himself. The February 21 agreement with the protesters required him to remain
pampango
Mar 2014
#36
I see that happen all the time ...seeing what has not been said and blathering about it...
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#41
Ex-RT Anchor Liz Wahl: RT 'Not About the Truth, It's About Promoting a Putinist Agenda'
Tx4obama
Mar 2014
#54