Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House suggests Social Security cuts remain 'on the table' [View all]Marr
(20,317 posts)109. Why? So he can brag that he offered to cut SS, but the GOP was too leftist to take the offer?
Seriously-- please answer that question for me, because I've seen defenders of this president offer that defense repeatedly, and it makes zero f'ing sense.
For one thing, he's not running for office again. For another, the political stain is on the guy who *offered* to cut SS, not the people who refused the offer. Hell, they can even frame their refusal to compromise on a budget as a defense of Social Security, if need be.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hopefully Rmoney will run again so there's a better choice in the caboodle ...err not!
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#82
Agreed. But keep in mind that if they're IN our tent, we can work on winning them over to the left.
beerandjesus
Mar 2014
#131
bwhahaah. concern over this is clearly legitimate as the administration is the one
cali
Mar 2014
#36
So the White House and Obama are liars? Or are these words from the White House invisable to you?
Autumn
Mar 2014
#65
It was an official bargaining chip. One the republicans hadn't asked for, he offered it.
Autumn
Mar 2014
#80
Why? So he can brag that he offered to cut SS, but the GOP was too leftist to take the offer?
Marr
Mar 2014
#109
One problem with this logic is it fails to account for the fact that nobody wants to cut
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#136
I hope no one here fell for the, "but it's not in the proposed budget therefore it must be off the
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#9
Or... we need to find the person with ODS who claims cuts are on the table:
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2014
#18
And just because it's not "on the table" doesnt mean it's "off the table". nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#55
Engangered species: "actual Democrat" ...Sanders is more of a Dem than the majority of Dems IMO.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#84
You do realize very few folks will be impacted, and the amount those few might have
Hoyt
Mar 2014
#57
I see no reason to trump up criticism of Obama. Maybe you guys should find something that matters.
Hoyt
Mar 2014
#59
They honestly seem to believe that they've transformed what a party is...
woo me with science
Mar 2014
#79
What part of multiple "senior administration officials made clear" don't you understand.
Divernan
Mar 2014
#50
I'm just suggesting that we take speculation, reading between the lines, and vague references
pinto
Mar 2014
#52
And they wonder why Dems have a "meh" attitude vis a vis the midterms. n/t
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#49
It is not my intention to offend the Radiant One, nor his patient, persecuted followers.
sibelian
Mar 2014
#122
I have written him on this and he replies politely with a lot of clap trap about
Cleita
Mar 2014
#73
I thought progressives were the only ones thrown under the bus but Dems are there too.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#81
Dem Voters will be blamed when TPP & Keystone XL are passed after Mid-Term Elections
KoKo
Mar 2014
#111
With Obama now the king of deportation ...don't expect a lot of Latino votes either.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#114
But hey Ukraine have a free billion on us! Let us know if you need more!
workinclasszero
Mar 2014
#106