Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
20. HR firms in my experience usually handle middle- to high-level management jobs.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 12:36 PM
Mar 2014

The people filling low-income jobs are dispensable. They usually don't get moving expenses. They just have to find another low-income job.

It's the poor, those employees looked upon as dispensable or replaceable by another often poorly trained person whose social mobility is severely limited in the US.

One of the reasons for the lack of social mobility among the poor is the cost of retraining and education for working people. We have community colleges in cities, but they charge for books, maybe even tuition and going to school takes time. A single mother who is working and has two or three children aged under 10 is not going to be able to take advantage of education or training oppotunities she needs to move up in the world unless she gets more than food stamps and welfare for her family.

When the children are grown, some mothers can find a school and attend maybe part-time. But it is very difficult then because by then the mother is in a poverty trap. It's hard to climb out of it once you are in your late 30s. The same principle applies to men though it is usually the women who are primarily responsible for the care of their children.

And then the Republicans wonder why women have abortions. It's really no mystery.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Real Poverty Trap..Paul Krugman..wow [View all] Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 OP
The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us cantbeserious Mar 2014 #1
I agree Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #2
The only "social mobility" they are interested in... malthaussen Mar 2014 #5
If the job moves these days, the corporation sure as hell LibDemAlways Mar 2014 #12
Actually, they sometimes do JayhawkSD Mar 2014 #15
HR firms in my experience usually handle middle- to high-level management jobs. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #20
Perhaps you missed the part where I said "my wife works for..." JayhawkSD Mar 2014 #25
My husband is an engineer with many years of experience. LibDemAlways Mar 2014 #32
I really don't think Jay is ever going to agree with what a LibDem has to say. Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2014 #36
True. Those who think companies out there LibDemAlways Mar 2014 #38
There may be occasional situations to the contrary, but in general the workers Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2014 #39
During the Reagan Administration, we called it Restructuring. The company moves and restarts DhhD Mar 2014 #18
+1 jsr Mar 2014 #6
They are currently engaged in Pulling Up the Ladders.. bvar22 Mar 2014 #29
K & MoFo R this reply. Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2014 #40
Exactly! ctsnowman Mar 2014 #42
Ryan's arguments aren't supposed to be, y'know, fact-based. Jerry442 Mar 2014 #3
WHAT'S ON THE TABLE THESE DAYS? Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #4
Not food. Some want food off the table. grahamhgreen Mar 2014 #44
Reasonable voices? woo me with science Mar 2014 #8
Yep. Exactly. LuvNewcastle Mar 2014 #22
Fact-based campaigning? JayhawkSD Mar 2014 #16
Good point. However, I wish we would do more to address single parenthood joeglow3 Mar 2014 #7
That "study" has been ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #9
But what percentage of single parent families are wealthy vs wealthy couples? n/t Fumesucker Mar 2014 #10
Granted ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #11
I agree it ties in to wealth joeglow3 Mar 2014 #23
+ 1000. Abusive is the key word. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #24
Excellent post JD! nt adirondacker Mar 2014 #35
single parenthood is not the problem Stargazer99 Mar 2014 #41
Do you disgaree that the likelihood is the same for two parent families? joeglow3 Mar 2014 #45
The answer is a living wage. Focusing on marriage is a distraction pushed by the right. nt redqueen Mar 2014 #46
Doesn't change even with a living wage joeglow3 Mar 2014 #47
Your evidence for this "natural advantage"? nt redqueen Mar 2014 #49
Common sense. joeglow3 Mar 2014 #51
It's simple, all right. It's a facile, shallow examination of a very complex issue. nt redqueen Mar 2014 #52
And yet, it is the single greatest predictor of a child's success joeglow3 Mar 2014 #53
According to that 30-year-old study? nt redqueen Mar 2014 #54
If by 30 year old, you mean from Jan. of 2014, then yes joeglow3 Mar 2014 #55
Can't read pdf on phone and no internet atm. redqueen Mar 2014 #56
Sure. No problem. joeglow3 Mar 2014 #58
pretty much the same on abortion PatrynXX Mar 2014 #13
du rec. xchrom Mar 2014 #14
Having raised children on my own PatSeg Mar 2014 #17
Another underlying fallacy Vox Moi Mar 2014 #19
+1,000,000! eom dreamnightwind Mar 2014 #37
Very well said. nt redqueen Mar 2014 #48
when he says onethatcares Mar 2014 #50
Always a Treat When The Man Goes To Town, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #21
Wrong just like the entire right-wing dogma is wrong-headed and virulently un-American. 'Nuff indepat Mar 2014 #26
K & R SunSeeker Mar 2014 #27
They say they are just trying to help the poor by cutting food stamps and welfare.... ErikJ Mar 2014 #28
Two parents better than one? artemis starwolf Mar 2014 #30
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Mar 2014 #31
Food stamps just cut AGAIN, too. merrily Mar 2014 #33
knr alfredo Mar 2014 #34
The right ctsnowman Mar 2014 #43
K&R. myrna minx Mar 2014 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Real Poverty Trap..Pa...»Reply #20