General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some of you have been on this site for over a decade. [View all]questionseverything
(11,523 posts)harder to catch the moving numbers...that is why I showed you the Spanish software company
I agree in some ways things are better than in 2002 but in some ways they are worse...you listed several tech problems with the machines...that made it easy for Kathy n to "find" an entire city of votes in Wisconsin couple days after the rest the state thought results were in
recently in Virginia 1000's of votes were "missed" in the vote accumulation before activists pointed it out
http://fatallyflawedelections.blogspot.com/
http://www.sweetremedy.tv/fatallyflawed/media/RTA_Fraud_Flyer_3_7_12.pdf
yes this case is 7 years old now...paper ballots do not do any good if only the machine gets to count them
in lots of states it is illegal to hand count even for a recount
the paper trail does not necessarily match the voters intent....in a former job I "programmed" diebold cash registers,(followed instructions in their booklet) even tho all the data was the same fed into it,the numbers printed out were different depending on what question I had asked it
anyways I am out of time but I stand by this....if the average person can not oversee every part of the election process with no special expertise it is not free, fair or democratic