Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moondust

(21,291 posts)
30. Good exercise, Ed.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 09:20 PM
Mar 2014

Due diligence rulez!



I think the irreversibility of an inevitable leak over the aquifer convinced me as well thanks to Ed's reporting. The pipes get old and deteriorate and corporations maximizing profits are unlikely to spend much money to replace them until it's too late. And once the aquifer is contaminated the oil companies can't clean it up.

Um, why can't Canada build a refinery of their own and a pipeline out to Vancouver?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Listening, and finally it got to him nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #1
yes AND admitted he was wrong. spanone Mar 2014 #2
Which raises him in my estimation nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #3
Agreed. n/t Laelth Mar 2014 #7
raises him waaaay above most. spanone Mar 2014 #8
How does it raise him above those that said no from the start? rhett o rick Mar 2014 #9
he investigated and found he was wrong. he admitted it. few do. spanone Mar 2014 #18
Righteousness is such a burden. Skidmore Mar 2014 #22
Thank you Ed! n/t veness Mar 2014 #4
Good for him. Only liberals change their minds after hearing FACTS. eppur_se_muova Mar 2014 #5
+1 G_j Mar 2014 #21
Glad to hear that marions ghost Mar 2014 #6
Let's retweet Ed's change of heart to show our appreciation flpoljunkie Mar 2014 #10
Check must not have cleared. nt obxhead Mar 2014 #11
some folks can check the facts and change their minds. spanone Mar 2014 #12
and some folks, like the person you responded too, can't help but crap on dems every chance they get dionysus Mar 2014 #14
Any serious journalist should have checked the facts before promoting something. obxhead Mar 2014 #19
ed may not be a serious journalist, he's a cable show host. but he's on the right side of this now. spanone Mar 2014 #28
Haaa! louis-t Mar 2014 #29
Better now than after its built and spills are occurring every month ... nt MindMover Mar 2014 #13
he took a journey almost like the one where he moved from his repug roots rurallib Mar 2014 #15
I respect Ed Schultz. I went through a period where I thought he was just an opportunist; northoftheborder Mar 2014 #16
here's the video of ed re: pipeline spanone Mar 2014 #17
Good Old Two-Faced Ed Schultz BodieTown Mar 2014 #20
It was nice to listen to him come to his senses over the past few weeks. GoCubsGo Mar 2014 #23
good for him G_j Mar 2014 #24
I'm glad Ed reversed himself on this. panader0 Mar 2014 #25
Good for Ed packman Mar 2014 #26
Hmmmm, what if Obama listened to him a couple of weeks ago????? George II Mar 2014 #27
Good exercise, Ed. moondust Mar 2014 #30
Good. I was ticked when he went after Obama for stalling the damn thing for year. in another thread freshwest Mar 2014 #31
He listened to both sides. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #32
kick eShirl Mar 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ed schultz admits he was ...»Reply #30