Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
294. You should not advocate for someone else's suicide.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 10:05 PM
Mar 2014

It's disgusting. My stepfather committed suicide and I don't joke around about that kind of stuff.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well at least it was of her hitting him Politicalboi Mar 2014 #1
I think there's no question about that now. Baitball Blogger Mar 2014 #3
Not defending either one, mimi85 Mar 2014 #346
maybe cvoogt Mar 2014 #356
That is not going to set well with the RC Mar 2014 #2
I suspect that those who have a gut instinct about him will still find fault. Orrex Mar 2014 #12
Check below, already a new meme now LOL snooper2 Mar 2014 #28
Yeah, who needs proof of anything around here anymore. RC Mar 2014 #80
Proof, schmoof. closeupready Mar 2014 #175
Proof. That's like science smience. nt valerief Mar 2014 #204
might have something to do with that 18 million he lost? Whisp Mar 2014 #300
I know. Imagine thinking that a man shouldn't be immune BainsBane Mar 2014 #102
I know, imagine thinking that the wife is as capable of abuse as the husband snooper2 Mar 2014 #128
What facts would those be? BainsBane Mar 2014 #140
"women commit as much" I didn't say as much now did I? snooper2 Mar 2014 #174
I'll quote what you said BainsBane Mar 2014 #210
actually men get abused by women but they are too embarrasses usually to report it. and of course roguevalley Mar 2014 #302
Women seldom report domestic violence either BainsBane Mar 2014 #333
since we weren't there none of us know. it will be sorted out. roguevalley Mar 2014 #354
That video is on a loop BainsBane Mar 2014 #234
It shows she hit him, right? Or are you arguing that it doesn't show why he deserved it? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #266
There are women who take advantage of the fact that their men won't hit back elehhhhna Mar 2014 #305
It shows two seconds BainsBane Mar 2014 #332
That study again. kcr Mar 2014 #335
Makes you wonder BainsBane Mar 2014 #349
Probably. He's posted it before, multiple times. kcr Mar 2014 #352
And will continue to... lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #380
Just like arguing with climate deniers and anti vaxxers kcr Mar 2014 #381
Of course I did. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #375
Jeff, please tell us how that paper BainsBane Mar 2014 #350
It is consistent with all modern studies of the issue. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #379
How do you suppose it is that the incidence of severe battery BainsBane Mar 2014 #385
It is absolutely relevant. In fact it's a central issue. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #390
I would appreciate it BainsBane Mar 2014 #392
I'm suggesting that you should take more seriously the issue of injurious violence against *women* lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #394
I understand that BainsBane Mar 2014 #395
Then help me understand. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #396
The video doesn't enable us to see whether he struck her prior to the seconds shown BainsBane Mar 2014 #398
imagine thinking that a human shouldn't be immune to battery charges villager Mar 2014 #162
You're sure I'd dismiss them? Why is that? BainsBane Mar 2014 #216
Both men and women are capable of battery. Not every man is ipso facto guilty. villager Mar 2014 #231
I have no reason to disbelieve you BainsBane Mar 2014 #236
I do not like the fact that you are bound and determined Boudica the Lyoness Mar 2014 #328
Believe me, I include you in nothing BainsBane Mar 2014 #330
I'm a different kind of woman than you are. Boudica the Lyoness Mar 2014 #336
No, quite the opposite BainsBane Mar 2014 #341
Lolita Grayson was the aggressor...Alan is legal eagle HipChick Mar 2014 #138
Who has decleared him guilty? BainsBane Mar 2014 #100
Links to what? I posted my opinion. Maybe you should read the rest of the thread first - RC Mar 2014 #127
Links to your assertion that "the usual suspects" have declared him guility BainsBane Mar 2014 #132
Support your assertion with some links of your own. RC Mar 2014 #179
Thank you.... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #192
You are Welcome. RC Mar 2014 #194
"Shrill" is an unwise term to use treestar Mar 2014 #215
Once again.. CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #331
I don't know what I'd call five paragraphs in one post kcr Mar 2014 #337
First... I am not attempting to distance myself from anyone. CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #361
Only when that poster accuses others of being shrill kcr Mar 2014 #365
My goodness... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #368
So, agreeing with someone is being a lemming? kcr Mar 2014 #374
LOL.... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #376
Yes. I said you disdain them kcr Mar 2014 #382
Thank you.... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #384
But I never said I didn't say it though kcr Mar 2014 #386
One more time... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #387
Okay. So, where am I saying you said you disdain them? kcr Mar 2014 #388
Enough.... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #389
Yes. I think you disdain them kcr Mar 2014 #391
I said I wasn't going to answer these inane comments again.... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #393
Use "shrill" and you sound like an anti-feminist, period. treestar Mar 2014 #357
Yet working together somehow includes BainsBane Mar 2014 #322
I can assure you... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #334
When you began by calling someone shrill BainsBane Mar 2014 #338
Let me be clear here... CherokeeDem Mar 2014 #348
In other words BainsBane Mar 2014 #208
YOU only see what you want to see. RC Mar 2014 #240
Here's the thing..... Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #310
There is a Group well know for their passive aggression against anyone that does not agree with RC Mar 2014 #329
Here is a thread demonstrating support for that group BainsBane Mar 2014 #344
Any of your replies to me would do it. RC Mar 2014 #358
Poor, persecuted you BainsBane Mar 2014 #362
Your posts are the evidence on your expertise on call outs, insults, harassment, and talking crap. RC Mar 2014 #367
Indeed many people do read these exchanges BainsBane Mar 2014 #369
Real Feminists BainsBane Mar 2014 #370
Links. RC Mar 2014 #372
You're accusing me of playing victim? BainsBane Mar 2014 #373
Still no links. RC Mar 2014 #377
I did provide links BainsBane Mar 2014 #383
you "encourage uppity women" as long as YOU decide they have a "valid case". you know what....? seabeyond Mar 2014 #371
This bizarre rationalization does not change Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #347
Oh, I see BainsBane Mar 2014 #321
Your war on HOF members has yielded postive results. BainsBane Mar 2014 #327
I define feminist for myself BainsBane Mar 2014 #323
Before the video there were people assuming his guilt Union Scribe Mar 2014 #202
I saw one person say she always had a bad feeling about him BainsBane Mar 2014 #213
She should be arrested and jailed!!!! JJChambers Mar 2014 #312
Why? BainsBane Mar 2014 #313
Domestic battery obviously ; her violent attack is on video JJChambers Mar 2014 #314
I see BainsBane Mar 2014 #315
No, it isn't up to him JJChambers Mar 2014 #316
Okay, you find me comprable cases BainsBane Mar 2014 #317
Doctored video? Tinfoil hat, or just too much to drink? The video speaks for itself JJChambers Mar 2014 #339
It's on a repeat loop BainsBane Mar 2014 #342
Hmm. Well kcr Mar 2014 #343
Interesting, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #4
Okay, I see a woman physically abusing a man, NOT the contrary, closeupready Mar 2014 #5
Serves me right rocktivity Mar 2014 #6
Domestic Abuse is wrong, she should in Jail! Heather MC Mar 2014 #7
I don't see what you all see. bravenak Mar 2014 #8
You saw stuff that wasn't there, bravenak. LiberalAndProud Mar 2014 #10
I just watched the video 10 times. bravenak Mar 2014 #22
I think pretty much why he was there HappyMe Mar 2014 #38
He has no right to be there without her permission, since he is no longer an occupant. bravenak Mar 2014 #50
That's abjectly wrong jberryhill Mar 2014 #54
What is that, the 4th time you've pointed that out, and still no response? opiate69 Mar 2014 #59
Not if there's domestic violence going on. bravenak Mar 2014 #61
Omg! What? HappyMe Mar 2014 #69
Yes. bravenak Mar 2014 #77
All the lawyers reading this are screaming at their computers. You are so wrong! Shrike47 Mar 2014 #150
There is a restraining order. He can't come and go as he pleases. bravenak Mar 2014 #155
As of today - not as of last weekend jberryhill Mar 2014 #163
So are you. bravenak Mar 2014 #164
Maybe it was a retroactive restraining order.. zeemike Mar 2014 #245
From the Fourth Dimensional District Court jberryhill Mar 2014 #263
Glad I didn't do this sort of work, berryhill, elleng Mar 2014 #280
No jberryhill Mar 2014 #301
That restraining order was obtained after the event csziggy Mar 2014 #181
I know that. bravenak Mar 2014 #187
omg you have an active imagination. I see a gal taking what looks like a drunken swing elehhhhna Mar 2014 #307
What do you hear though? bravenak Mar 2014 #308
Oh, what ridiculousness you are trying to argue here. closeupready Mar 2014 #79
I don't care. bravenak Mar 2014 #82
Let me get this straight.... jberryhill Mar 2014 #90
My step dad is dead. bravenak Mar 2014 #101
OMG jberryhill Mar 2014 #119
No, neither of them has "more right to be there" jberryhill Mar 2014 #86
So? bravenak Mar 2014 #92
Then she needs to get an appropriate court order jberryhill Mar 2014 #97
I belive she will. bravenak Mar 2014 #105
Regardless of what may happen in the future jberryhill Mar 2014 #113
She filed for an injunction against him. bravenak Mar 2014 #115
Again, FILING for an injunction doesn't require him to stay away jberryhill Mar 2014 #123
I think it will be granted. bravenak Mar 2014 #129
So what? jberryhill Mar 2014 #131
Last Saturday he should have called instead of showing up uninvited and this wouldn't even be bravenak Mar 2014 #135
I have no idea what you mean by "should" jberryhill Mar 2014 #141
Why would I mean legal terms? bravenak Mar 2014 #145
No I do not live my life by legal terminology jberryhill Mar 2014 #146
She has a restraining order. bravenak Mar 2014 #158
NOW she does, yeah jberryhill Mar 2014 #161
He can't come and go as he pleases with the allegations of violence no matter who owns the house. bravenak Mar 2014 #167
Give it up. You lost this in your own circular logic. Just admit it. phleshdef Mar 2014 #239
All I was saying is he lived else where. bravenak Mar 2014 #243
You either know more to this story than I do or you are making a LOT of assumptions. phleshdef Mar 2014 #247
He was not living there. bravenak Mar 2014 #255
You can stop repeating yourself on the restraining order. phleshdef Mar 2014 #262
I only know that he said he was not living there. bravenak Mar 2014 #268
If one party is filing for such an injunction kcr Mar 2014 #178
Here we go with more abjectification. Orrex Mar 2014 #76
I abject to that allegation jberryhill Mar 2014 #221
I assume you are liti gator. Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #252
She may have a PFA treestar Mar 2014 #214
She had neither jberryhill Mar 2014 #220
If she wants the house, she is going to have HappyMe Mar 2014 #64
He can't go there if she feels threatened. bravenak Mar 2014 #68
She was the one hitting him. HappyMe Mar 2014 #73
We only got part of the video. bravenak Mar 2014 #78
Ah, yes, the old "we didn't see the whole video" gambit... regnaD kciN Mar 2014 #353
I was present for the Rodney King riots. bravenak Mar 2014 #355
Absent a court order, he can go there no matter how she feels. Shrike47 Mar 2014 #171
He should have called and asked to come over and talk to her in person. bravenak Mar 2014 #173
Maybe he shouldn't have even bothered being born, as to not inconvenience anyone. phleshdef Mar 2014 #288
I don't think being born was up to him. bravenak Mar 2014 #290
Well he could have at least had the common decency to off himself as soon as he was old enough to... phleshdef Mar 2014 #292
You should not advocate for someone else's suicide. bravenak Mar 2014 #294
Its not a joke and its not advocacy. Its mockery. phleshdef Mar 2014 #304
I'm not comfortable with mockery about suicide. bravenak Mar 2014 #306
Wow... that's pretty sick, even if you're attempting ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #295
Whatever. phleshdef Mar 2014 #303
Yep... suicide=whatever... ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #309
I'm not taking time to learn shit. phleshdef Mar 2014 #319
That is often said treestar Mar 2014 #223
Why was he there? LisaL Mar 2014 #43
I didn't see him in the doorway. LiberalAndProud Mar 2014 #49
I understand how you feel. bravenak Mar 2014 #182
It's a temporary restraining order. LiberalAndProud Mar 2014 #232
The video makes both of them look stupid. bravenak Mar 2014 #233
Yes. And put the kids in cold storage while they sort it all out. LiberalAndProud Mar 2014 #235
I think the kids should get to have some choice of which parent they go with. bravenak Mar 2014 #237
Interesting that they call joint custody "time-sharing" in Florida. LiberalAndProud Mar 2014 #254
Or like toys. bravenak Mar 2014 #256
What we didn't see is HIM hitting HER. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #134
I indicated that. bravenak Mar 2014 #139
So 'not seeing' is doing now. Wow! Dawgs Mar 2014 #184
Not to me, I have to actually see things before I believe them. But apparently yes, to some sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #206
Why answer the door? Why not call the cops and stay safely inside? liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #13
She was not at the door. bravenak Mar 2014 #21
They both obviously need to learn boundaries. If she is hitting him she is not innocent in this. liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #24
Of course they BOTH need to learn boundaries. bravenak Mar 2014 #26
Actually, if she's hitting him, then she's GUILTY in this. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #269
Perhaps you can enlighten me jberryhill Mar 2014 #31
Doesn't matter who own it. bravenak Mar 2014 #36
You and your landlord have a legally binding agreement on access to the property. Do the Graysons? opiate69 Mar 2014 #45
He moved out. bravenak Mar 2014 #70
From jberryhill's post downthread, citing an actual divorce atty. opiate69 Mar 2014 #81
Never said he lost ownership rights. bravenak Mar 2014 #83
Sweet Jeebus. opiate69 Mar 2014 #93
I bet he won't be allowed to live at home with her. bravenak Mar 2014 #104
That IS a right of ownership jberryhill Mar 2014 #94
I bet he won't be able to come and go as he pleases. bravenak Mar 2014 #107
so you now recognize he may in the future not be able to enter Trajan Mar 2014 #244
He can't enter the property now. bravenak Mar 2014 #246
No, that is absolutely incorrect jberryhill Mar 2014 #47
You just made up that whole narrative now. HappyMe Mar 2014 #14
I made up the part about what I think she was yelling about. I said that. bravenak Mar 2014 #16
Again, you are making assumptions OldHippieChick Mar 2014 #15
He may have, or he may not. bravenak Mar 2014 #18
She filed in January jberryhill Mar 2014 #29
What makes it her house? jberryhill Mar 2014 #32
Articles I've seen refer to it as "their" house. LisaL Mar 2014 #33
The fact that she living there and he's not. bravenak Mar 2014 #44
No, that is not what makes it "her" house jberryhill Mar 2014 #51
Except a messy divorce. bravenak Mar 2014 #58
Sorry but you are very incorrect. Jazzgirl Mar 2014 #110
That's not the case I'm making. bravenak Mar 2014 #126
In his case, it appears he does own the house, jointy with his wife. LisaL Mar 2014 #52
Who's living in the house has squat to do HappyMe Mar 2014 #55
Here, this article by a FL divorce lawyer may straighten you out jberryhill Mar 2014 #60
Nobody said she changed the locks. bravenak Mar 2014 #65
Having a really hard time understanding this, are you? jberryhill Mar 2014 #87
You seem to be having a hard time distinguishing kcr Mar 2014 #103
Unless she had some sort of order from the court (which doesn't look like she did), LisaL Mar 2014 #106
It doesn't look like she did? kcr Mar 2014 #112
Because I haven't seen anything reported saying saying that she did. LisaL Mar 2014 #118
Because that would be THE story here jberryhill Mar 2014 #124
Absent a court order he does have the right to come and go as he pleases jberryhill Mar 2014 #109
And you know she does't have one how? kcr Mar 2014 #116
If he violated an order from the court he would have been arrested. Don't you freaking think that? LisaL Mar 2014 #120
THere's no mention of police involvment or a police report kcr Mar 2014 #125
Let's put in perspective how ridiculous your assertion is jberryhill Mar 2014 #136
No, that's not my theory kcr Mar 2014 #143
Then try to rationalize what his lawyers are doing. jberryhill Mar 2014 #151
Defending their client. That's what he pays them for. kcr Mar 2014 #154
ROFL jberryhill Mar 2014 #159
ROFLOMGZ!11 kcr Mar 2014 #168
Yes, I can jump to that conclusion jberryhill Mar 2014 #186
Why wouldn't the issue the same order again? kcr Mar 2014 #195
Yes, there is. Articles say she called 911. LisaL Mar 2014 #137
Because he'd be in jail right now, and not offering a video of him there jberryhill Mar 2014 #121
No, not "kind of obvious" kcr Mar 2014 #142
There IS no restraining order jberryhill Mar 2014 #144
That's what I said. I wasn't talking about a restraining order. kcr Mar 2014 #148
There is a restraining order. bravenak Mar 2014 #160
There was no such order in place at the time of the video jberryhill Mar 2014 #165
And my main point was that to prevent this he should have called and gotten her permission bravenak Mar 2014 #169
Why? Rep. Grayson had every legal right to be in his own home. Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #259
Him asserting his legal right was not smart. bravenak Mar 2014 #260
You sound just like the cops who told me the exact same thing, right in my front yard. Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #264
Hmmm. bravenak Mar 2014 #271
The cops arrest her? Are you serious? They assumed I was the bad guy, with zero evidence. Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #282
I don't see anyone assuming he's the bad guy. bravenak Mar 2014 #284
His wife assaulting him was HIS fault. Gotcha. You've said that over and over. Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #286
You are making yourself sick. bravenak Mar 2014 #289
Keep defending the abuser. Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #298
Aren't you sick? bravenak Mar 2014 #299
There is a restraining order. bravenak Mar 2014 #153
After she claimed her attacked her. LisaL Mar 2014 #188
I didn't say she had already had it. bravenak Mar 2014 #189
Maybe he should ask for one. LisaL Mar 2014 #198
He should. bravenak Mar 2014 #200
I see the same thing you do Andy823 Mar 2014 #40
I would like to know that as well. bravenak Mar 2014 #41
Perhaps Grayson's lawyer didn't present the full video of the event for whatever reason. lumpy Mar 2014 #222
Every piece of you logic is wrong. rhett o rick Mar 2014 #196
It has been known that they are having a bad divorce not an amicable split. bravenak Mar 2014 #199
You dont know that she didnt invite him over to fix the toilet. You dont know enough rhett o rick Mar 2014 #211
I think he isn't respecting her boundaries because I can see her in the video yelling at him bravenak Mar 2014 #225
thank you, bravenak.. you are making Cha Mar 2014 #324
It would help to hear what's going on. bravenak Mar 2014 #326
Right.. they accuse you of "knee jerk" while Cha Mar 2014 #340
I find it very strange. bravenak Mar 2014 #345
I'm glad they were unsuccessful. Talk about Cha Mar 2014 #351
I'm wondering if anyone here read the part... malokvale77 Mar 2014 #203
I saw that the daughter said her mother was the aggressor. Haven't seen anyone mention that. lumpy Mar 2014 #217
In an earlier report 2naSalit Mar 2014 #212
It is sad. bravenak Mar 2014 #224
And perhaps 2naSalit Mar 2014 #229
I am not trying to convict anyone. bravenak Mar 2014 #230
Of course you don't nt Logical Mar 2014 #248
Holy smokes! HappyMe Mar 2014 #9
Wow. If someone pushed me in my face like that, Id have lost it. bunnies Mar 2014 #11
Wow. warrior1 Mar 2014 #17
a few notes of caution: geek tragedy Mar 2014 #19
A couple of things... bunnies Mar 2014 #35
well, generally abusers don't have adult witnesses around geek tragedy Mar 2014 #39
At least ones that would give a shit. bunnies Mar 2014 #42
He did have a very defensive stance. LisaL Mar 2014 #48
you forgot 3) It does NOT prove what she claims! Logical Mar 2014 #249
this video certainly isn't helpful for her case, didn't feel compelled to point out the obvious nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #251
And also because it's tragically inconvenient to the prevailing dogma. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #272
cool story, bro nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #275
Well how convenient that there was a camera there Le Taz Hot Mar 2014 #20
yes it was, you sound like youre sorry there is proof of his innocence leftyohiolib Mar 2014 #25
Wow. I can't believe you just posted that here. closeupready Mar 2014 #56
I'm sure there are those who would love to see left leaning progressives fall, so they wouldn't have liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #72
Yeah, Le Taz Hot Mar 2014 #170
One wonders if it was a "Roving" cameraman Blue Owl Mar 2014 #172
LOL, meaning what? nt Logical Mar 2014 #250
Why yes, yes it was. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #273
I suspect that video was filmed by one of those newfangled cell phones that take pictures. pacalo Mar 2014 #359
At least this should put him in the clear. pa28 Mar 2014 #23
Smart man to take a staff member with him. Blue Diadem Mar 2014 #27
I said this before the video, I will say it now. We should wait for the investigation. stevenleser Mar 2014 #30
+1. My best friend went through a rather prolonged divorce, which meant I made more than a few winter is coming Mar 2014 #37
Oh, I have been through divorce twice. It's like a trip through the twilight zone. nt stevenleser Mar 2014 #276
This is just the DU pretrial stage of the investigation. LiberalAndProud Mar 2014 #166
lol treestar Mar 2014 #227
That's what gets me. The certainty of it. I'm happy to give my impression and guess but stevenleser Mar 2014 #278
Wow, someone else with this theory kcr Mar 2014 #297
Depends on two things. #1 - Whether the victim would be in real danger #2 - If the victim feared stevenleser Mar 2014 #320
So, you hear about victims doing this all the time just like police officers then? n/t kcr Mar 2014 #325
I am sure you think this reductio ad absurdum response is good debate. It's not. stevenleser Mar 2014 #360
You're right. I haven't. You know why? kcr Mar 2014 #363
I am not jumping to conclusions either and that is why I have said many times, I am not sure. stevenleser Mar 2014 #364
this isn't proof of his innocence as far as I'm concerned cali Mar 2014 #34
Her own daughter contradicted her mother's story. Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #253
Her daughter was arrested for assaulting her mother, just to let you know. bravenak Mar 2014 #258
Lolita Grayson seems to be the erratic person alleged by Rep. Grayson. Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #261
We don't anything about whether she needs psychiatric care or not. bravenak Mar 2014 #287
Oh yeah, of course the cops arrest the daughter. Who do you think they believe first? Ikonoklast Mar 2014 #291
The link you provided has more key information. pacalo Mar 2014 #283
I posted it because there are more allegations made by them against her. bravenak Mar 2014 #285
I agree about the audio. pacalo Mar 2014 #293
The audio might make him look even better. bravenak Mar 2014 #296
Is that how this works? He needs to prove his innocence? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #270
She has bruises on her arm and shoulders Not 840high Mar 2014 #318
Lying about abuse, eh? Oh, but that never happens! Waiting For Everyman Mar 2014 #46
Men are treated as disposable tools in our society Harmony Blue Mar 2014 #53
+ A Million, but you will get NOWHERE on this board with a discussion closeupready Mar 2014 #63
there are those of us who stand up for men too. We're just not as loud as the ones who claim all men liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #67
Glad that I was wrong, then, friend. closeupready Mar 2014 #75
I have a wonderful, loving husband and a son who is kind and caring. liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #91
I disagree that there are DUers who claim all men are evil. cyberswede Mar 2014 #96
funny that there are no DUers who "claim all men are evil" so no the Mens' Rights' geek tragedy Mar 2014 #147
I don't understand what you mean by "disposable tools" cyberswede Mar 2014 #66
One example of this is war Harmony Blue Mar 2014 #84
Using poeple for cannon fodder is wrong. cyberswede Mar 2014 #95
The reason being that men are still taught to stick to traditional gender roles Harmony Blue Mar 2014 #366
War is an instance where male machismo becomes fatal. Gravitycollapse Mar 2014 #241
lol Sheldon Cooper Mar 2014 #85
I'm sorry, but that's a grotesque generalization in light of the number of women cali Mar 2014 #108
I don't think the objectification of women sibelian Mar 2014 #180
As far as I can tell they didn't say anything about women. Dawgs Mar 2014 #191
that's the downside of gender essentialism promoted by cultural conservatives alp227 Mar 2014 #114
That's what you get from this? treestar Mar 2014 #228
This is literally the exact opposite of how society works. Gravitycollapse Mar 2014 #238
Its good to see he wasn't the one doing the hitting and yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #57
I live in his district, and so far it's a non issue. Not Me Mar 2014 #62
So much pointing of fingers in the other thread at jumping to conclusions kcr Mar 2014 #71
why no sound? Whisp Mar 2014 #74
No, it's not weird. The video has sound. It was edited over concerns that it might not be legal LisaL Mar 2014 #88
Yep, Andy823 Mar 2014 #89
It's edited out. For crying out loud. LisaL Mar 2014 #98
If the sound was edited out then something else may have been too. Whisp Mar 2014 #117
Do you not understand that it might not be legal to release what she was saying unless LisaL Mar 2014 #122
That's fine, but it's still missing information n/t kcr Mar 2014 #130
His lawyers have it. LisaL Mar 2014 #133
Okay kcr Mar 2014 #156
It is clear to me that this video doesn't prove anything and Could have been altered in other ways Whisp Mar 2014 #157
What legal concerns? Andy823 Mar 2014 #152
the edited out sound as a legality is not mentioned in the story.. Whisp Mar 2014 #176
You are allowed to google it, you know. LisaL Mar 2014 #185
There have been instances where cops have arrested people on wire tap charges for 1monster Mar 2014 #397
In Oregon, it's illegal to covertly record audio but you can openly video legally. Shrike47 Mar 2014 #183
Thank you. I should have known that but some things fall through the cracks. Whisp Mar 2014 #190
Pretty smart on his part. His wife would be wise to consider doing the same. temporary311 Mar 2014 #99
+1 B Calm Mar 2014 #149
NeJame was one of CNN's commentators in the Trayvon Martin trial. amandabeech Mar 2014 #111
So, this DID go down the way I hoped it did in my response to last night's thread! Systematic Chaos Mar 2014 #177
Divorce is a blessing! She apparently had an injunction against him for violence Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #193
Maybe you should actually read the whole thread. LisaL Mar 2014 #197
I did. There's obviously something wrong with this marriage. Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #209
She got an order based on her assertions of violence (no proof beyond her allegation needed.) Shrike47 Mar 2014 #257
Either way, it makes me realize how important divorce is. It might sadden some, but Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #267
This message was self-deleted by its author Th1onein Mar 2014 #201
I would expect a 'battered' wife to avoid having any confrontations with her 'abuser'. pacalo Mar 2014 #205
He showed up, apparently. Some marriages need to end. Most marriages in fact do end. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #218
She needs to remember those are his kids, too. They are going to want to see him & vice versa. pacalo Mar 2014 #226
He was allowed to show up. There was no restraining order. phleshdef Mar 2014 #242
Even though she is the aggressor, this video will hurt him Warpy Mar 2014 #207
Is it too much to hope that people learned not to jump to conclusions? LittleBlue Mar 2014 #219
If folks didn't learn that temporary311 Mar 2014 #274
Alan, if you see this..... We've all been through it at one time or another... Pinkflamingo Mar 2014 #265
agreed grasswire Mar 2014 #277
Alan, if you see this, why do you pander to corporations such as Sea World??? ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #279
you may have been... stillcool Mar 2014 #281
Grayson has a lot of great zingers, but there's something fried eggs Mar 2014 #311
I wouldn't give a fuck what he does in his private life gopiscrap Mar 2014 #378
Grayson' Taliban Ad Whisp Mar 2014 #399
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alan Grayson's Divorce is...»Reply #294