Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,690 posts)
58. You may be correct about the outcome.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 04:26 AM
Mar 2014

But I certainly hope that the crisis/standoff can be resolved peacefully, with some sort of positively proactive future engagement that all parties can live with.

The whole situation has been a crisis waiting to happen.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Please put a "put down your drink" warning on this jtuck004 Mar 2014 #1
What is the normal level there then if its not 16,000 ? dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #4
I doubt we will ever know. But we know they have bases, there is a fleet based there, jtuck004 Mar 2014 #7
Far too often we believe just about anything the faces on our televisions tell us to believe. another_liberal Mar 2014 #22
I'm surprised we haven't made hating an Olympic sport. n/t jtuck004 Mar 2014 #47
Maybe its a case like baseball . . . another_liberal Mar 2014 #49
Careful with information on factual agreements. go west young man Mar 2014 #2
Yes. You are right. For months we at DU have been reminiscing fondly Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #3
Do you think this is imagined? newthinking Mar 2014 #8
What is your point? BainsBane Mar 2014 #11
No, but they certainly should not consort and give them executive branch positions newthinking Mar 2014 #12
I guess I'm just an old-fashioned anti-imperialist BainsBane Mar 2014 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author newthinking Mar 2014 #15
Seems to me... Adrahil Mar 2014 #31
Okay, so if a country has neo-Nazis BainsBane Mar 2014 #38
You know they hold parliamentary seats, right? Adrahil Mar 2014 #30
You can't exclude them because they are calling the shots........ rdharma Mar 2014 #37
When it gets to the point of justifying a military incursion into a sovereign nation BainsBane Mar 2014 #10
Crimea is considered and legally an autonomous region and has it's own parliment newthinking Mar 2014 #16
Autonomous regions don't get to invite armed foreign troops to patrol the country muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #27
You are superb at reciting Russian propaganda BainsBane Mar 2014 #39
I was called a lot worse when I opposed the Iraq war . . . another_liberal Mar 2014 #25
Yeah, it's not like Russian assholes are firing shots over the heads snooper2 Mar 2014 #42
Our propaganda is better than theirs. L0oniX Mar 2014 #43
As a wise man here on DU once said: RT is bankrolled by the Kremlin... Tx4obama Mar 2014 #5
You should be sceptical of most media newthinking Mar 2014 #13
Such references dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #17
What if the Kremlin "bankrolls" them to tell us the truth? another_liberal Mar 2014 #23
Those who doubt RT may wish to note that even the NYT BlueMTexpat Mar 2014 #6
The part where the NYT excuses thousands of Russian soldiers taking over Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #9
Well, the article is from 1997 - BlueMTexpat Mar 2014 #44
It Is Common Knowledge, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #46
I am actually flattered to have BlueMTexpat Mar 2014 #56
You Are Too Kind, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #57
You may be correct about the outcome. BlueMTexpat Mar 2014 #58
I Cetainly Share That Hope, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #59
So, this articles argument is iamthebandfanman Mar 2014 #18
If there was a non-democratic overthrow of the German government? GeorgeGist Mar 2014 #19
We get to invade Germany using troops from the base? n/t pampango Mar 2014 #21
That is the key question. There is no doubt that Russian troops are allowed in Crimea - that's where pampango Mar 2014 #20
Like our bases in Japan mean we can take over the country when we want, right? randome Mar 2014 #24
I doubt it. another_liberal Mar 2014 #33
No. My point is that I'm sure we have the right to protect the base using troops within the base pampango Mar 2014 #35
I was trying for sarcasm and agreeing with your original point. randome Mar 2014 #40
An important clarification from Fox News: Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #26
And remember, RT is an impartial, objective news source... SidDithers Mar 2014 #28
At least someone had the courage to not just unquestioningly fall into line . . . another_liberal Mar 2014 #34
Yanukovych 'overthrew' himself. The February 21 agreement with the protesters required him to remain pampango Mar 2014 #36
"unquestionably fall into line" BainsBane Mar 2014 #45
Good . . . another_liberal Mar 2014 #50
I'm so gald to know that imperialism is OK Progressive dog Mar 2014 #29
Who is saying that? another_liberal Mar 2014 #32
I see that happen all the time ...seeing what has not been said and blathering about it... L0oniX Mar 2014 #41
RT News defends the Russians in Progressive dog Mar 2014 #53
So why ProSense Mar 2014 #48
Ok, now this is just too much. Give me a break. EmilyAnne Mar 2014 #51
Have you seen how events are being reported in American media? another_liberal Mar 2014 #55
Is this post supposed to be funny? You are citing RT? cthulu2016 Mar 2014 #52
RT has been used as a source ever since Assange went to work there TorchTheWitch Mar 2014 #60
Ex-RT Anchor Liz Wahl: RT 'Not About the Truth, It's About Promoting a Putinist Agenda' Tx4obama Mar 2014 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An important clarificatio...»Reply #58