Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: An important clarification from Russia Today News. [View all]BlueMTexpat
(15,690 posts)58. You may be correct about the outcome.
But I certainly hope that the crisis/standoff can be resolved peacefully, with some sort of positively proactive future engagement that all parties can live with.
The whole situation has been a crisis waiting to happen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I doubt we will ever know. But we know they have bases, there is a fleet based there,
jtuck004
Mar 2014
#7
Far too often we believe just about anything the faces on our televisions tell us to believe.
another_liberal
Mar 2014
#22
No, but they certainly should not consort and give them executive branch positions
newthinking
Mar 2014
#12
When it gets to the point of justifying a military incursion into a sovereign nation
BainsBane
Mar 2014
#10
Crimea is considered and legally an autonomous region and has it's own parliment
newthinking
Mar 2014
#16
Autonomous regions don't get to invite armed foreign troops to patrol the country
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2014
#27
The part where the NYT excuses thousands of Russian soldiers taking over
Pretzel_Warrior
Mar 2014
#9
That is the key question. There is no doubt that Russian troops are allowed in Crimea - that's where
pampango
Mar 2014
#20
No. My point is that I'm sure we have the right to protect the base using troops within the base
pampango
Mar 2014
#35
At least someone had the courage to not just unquestioningly fall into line . . .
another_liberal
Mar 2014
#34
Yanukovych 'overthrew' himself. The February 21 agreement with the protesters required him to remain
pampango
Mar 2014
#36
I see that happen all the time ...seeing what has not been said and blathering about it...
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#41
Ex-RT Anchor Liz Wahl: RT 'Not About the Truth, It's About Promoting a Putinist Agenda'
Tx4obama
Mar 2014
#54