Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Scientists Build Orgasm Machine For Women [View all]Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)7. God at the comments below that story.
Men honestly think all they are to women is an ATM machine? Or that women will "come" if you flash wads of $100 bills at them?
Apparently many of the men in Charlotte have no earthly idea how to satisfy a woman in the bedroom or out or they wouldn't be making those comments.
And, for the record, women don't need men for money any more.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are DU members whose brains would shoot out of their ears should they read this...
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2014
#3
Interesting - the last few alerts on me used that term 'misogynist' (nt)
The Straight Story
Mar 2014
#17
I have no idea either. Last several posts people have given me a heads up on
The Straight Story
Mar 2014
#26
Probably reported by one of those RW fundies in here who are trying to "pass" for libs. nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#51
in the sense that they'll take it apart afterwards and not let anybody look at the equipment?
MisterP
Mar 2014
#54
I think acupuncturists have know this for centuries..that said...this is fantastic news a may lead to
Drew Richards
Mar 2014
#6
My guess is, all they have to OFFER a woman....or anyone else....is their money.
loudsue
Mar 2014
#53
Also, this story is 13 years old and the technology has been brought into question before.
Gravitycollapse
Mar 2014
#12
Thanks, sloppy journalism in the article linked in the OP. The real news is the patent.
Jim Lane
Mar 2014
#82
Thank you for that link. Not only for the article, hard as it was to read,
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2014
#78
Hey! I got all joyful and all, then read that it's a medical thingie and probably has to be
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#50
What a shame. Too late to make it into the Fifty shades of Grey movie.
Baitball Blogger
Mar 2014
#87