General Discussion

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

26. You're not the only one, that is why I want them to come right out and name names. This insidious

Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:55 AM

Mar 2014

McCarthyite attack on Liberals who deal in FACTS as they did throughout the Bush era and were proven to be correct, because they CARE about this country, is very, very familiar and has NO PLACE on this forum.

Let them have the guts to name names, at least the right wingers were direct about it which made it possible to wipe the floor with them when they used the same despicable tactic 'crushing on Saddam' nonsense.

This is being said about people here who have served their country, who have lost loved ones, friends in Bush's wars and it is absolutely reprehensible.

So either they have the guts to come right out and accuse someone, whoever in their wild imaginations that happens to be and risk the TERRIBLE consequences of having a post hidden on an internet forum. Now THAT would take courage!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

126 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Y'know... I can call-out some actual Putin lovers [View all] cthulu2016 Mar 2014 OP

True, Sir: Republican Crushes On Mr. Putin Rather Give Their Whole Game Away The Magistrate Mar 2014 #1

+1 OKNancy Mar 2014 #3

As long as the ruler is their gop daddy, like Ilsa Mar 2014 #9

.... DeSwiss Mar 2014 #12

Nailed it. n/t freshwest Mar 2014 #15

Hands across the sea, Sir. bemildred Mar 2014 #16

Let's hope that they keep it up through 2016. n/t amandabeech Mar 2014 #25

Oh, I do. nt bemildred Mar 2014 #27

Indeed nt fishwax Mar 2014 #101

^^^ This ^^^ I could not have said it better! Excellent! n/t RKP5637 Mar 2014 #102

There are a few weirdos here who are "crushing" on Vlad the bare chested bear man, too. MADem Mar 2014 #2

Unfortunately MIRT can't get the ones that have been here for a while.... Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #4

That's so true. There's the odd newbies who turned up for the Olympics and stayed for the invasion, MADem Mar 2014 #5

S'truth. +1 riqster Mar 2014 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author Autumn Mar 2014 #17

I am really getting tired of that meme. It is not true for the most part Mojorabbit Mar 2014 #36

Send your concerns to MIRT CreekDog Mar 2014 #123

You around?Check out that gun thread in hosts Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #124

I saw someone accuse someone of adoring Putin because he used a metaphor... ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #18

This might be too nuanced for you. MADem Mar 2014 #37

You may have forgotten... go west young man Mar 2014 #60

What do you think I've done? Read the thread before you start finger wagging. MADem Mar 2014 #63

Did I miss something when you posted this upstream? go west young man Mar 2014 #104

Yes. Read the whole thread, or don't. I don't really care what you do. Putin is a despot, MADem Mar 2014 #105

In 2003, Bush sent troops into Iraq; in 2014, Putin sent troops into Ukraine muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #82

When a good many people don't see it ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #86

Yes, and the reverse is true. When people do see something happening, it likely is. nt MADem Mar 2014 #87

I think you're losing this battle of trying to frame something. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #88

What "battle?" I'm not doing any fighting, here, never mind rebutting long screeds MADem Mar 2014 #89

Why wouldn't you name names? If I saw anyone pretending to be a liberal sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #19

They don't exist... ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #21

You're not the only one, that is why I want them to come right out and name names. This insidious sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #26

Well said. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #30

Yes, despicable. Thankfully it is only a few, but one is too many on a Democratic forum. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #32

Well .... polly7 Mar 2014 #85

Scary, isn't it? Creepy actually because our hope that the country wasn't totally lost during the sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #103

What, and offer up an alert opportunity for a callout? MADem Mar 2014 #23

If what you are saying is true, there would be no risk of an alert. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #28

It is true, but that doesn't remove the risk at all. The very people who object to Pootie MADem Mar 2014 #38

Seems like a small price to pay, a hidden post, to clear the board of 'Putin lovers'. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #40

Well, maybe for those who enjoy engaging in disruptive conduct. MADem Mar 2014 #41

I always take my own advice, thanks for the suggestion. And if I find a Putin/Saddam lover sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #43

Who's using the "commie lover" routine? Name names, now!!!! MADem Mar 2014 #46

Well, you for one, and if you give me a minute I believe there is another in this thread. Calling sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #49

I know that Putin isn't a commie, so your premise is a lame attempt and false. MADem Mar 2014 #54

Is he the enemy? sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #57

No "work" involved at all. Not even a bit. Some posters have a lot to say about certain topics. MADem Mar 2014 #61

'Commie' a reference to 'enemy' not to his politics, ideology. But carry on. I'm having fun. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #65

Annnnnd....there it is! MADem Mar 2014 #67

You Better Believe It! nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #91

OK that wins the thread!!! MADem Mar 2014 #108

Covering GD in a fine shit spray of unsubstantiated generic accusations isn't "a better way winter is coming Mar 2014 #34

You have a search feature, as I said elsewhere in this thread. Why aren't you getting busy yourself MADem Mar 2014 #39

I have been paying attention, and have not found this mob of Putin Lovers, or even one frankly. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #42

But you found the "commie" accusers--so you say--and I don't see you naming those names, now! MADem Mar 2014 #51

You tossed the smear out there. If you don't want to back it up, you shouldn't make it. n/t winter is coming Mar 2014 #44

It's not a smear, it's an observation. nt MADem Mar 2014 #48

No, it's a smear. If it were something you actually observed, you would provide a link sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #50

Well, I've provided a number of links. MADem Mar 2014 #52

No, you intended to smear good Democratic DUers imo, and with nothing to back up your claims sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #53

You are not a good source for these assertions, I'm afraid, given your own history. MADem Mar 2014 #55

'What books do you read, what are your sources of information, do you sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #59

Sorry, your attempt at constructing a "straw man interrogation" won't work. MADem Mar 2014 #69

Sure you have no 'desire' to know my reading habits. Lol, you just proved otherwise and are still sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #71

What did I just say? I Do Not CARE what you read. As for the rest, Sabrina, TL-DR. MADem Mar 2014 #72

Sorry, you chose to try to intimidate me by using an old comment of mine, coincidentally the same sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #73

Again....TL/DR. Go bother someone else. You're ranting/rambling. nt MADem Mar 2014 #74

Not for you, for those reading. Don't attack me for what I choose to read and you won't have to sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #75

Now you're just goading/baiting and writing dramatic subject lines. Again, TL/DR. nt MADem Mar 2014 #77

I'm responding to an attempt to accuse democrats of being 'enemy lovers'. And when I sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #78

How many more paragraphs are you going to write? I'm not reading your diatribes, sorry. nt MADem Mar 2014 #79

The news was interesing, I checked out RT, Al Jazeera and CCTV, also the BBC. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #80

Why are you hyperposting? I don't read past your subject lines, and I don't care what you're up to. MADem Mar 2014 #84

The reason is obvious. joshcryer Mar 2014 #94

I believe I have repeatedly asked you to refrain from any contact with me, including the now well sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #115

Leave me alone. joshcryer Mar 2014 #117

I am asking you again, stop following me around DU. And don't even try to twist what you are doing. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #118

I wasn't talking to or about you. joshcryer Mar 2014 #119

You've discovered my method of dealing with this poster....read nothing after msanthrope Mar 2014 #98

I think the term "word salad" is apt in this particular situation. MADem Mar 2014 #107

Yes--Hannah Bell/HiPointDem/*** is a staunch NK apologist. msanthrope Mar 2014 #110

Ewww!!! ASPIC!! MADem Mar 2014 #111

That is just nasty. What the hell are the white chunks? nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #112

I think that might be boiled white potato or maybe diced swedes.... MADem Mar 2014 #114

Not very nice of you to speak that way about MADem. As you can see, I don't get along too well sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #120

Good, then you won't be worrying about what sources DUers use to inform themselves anymore. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #121

I'll still call a source BS when that's what it is, but you have a nice day, now! nt MADem Mar 2014 #122

Why does this conversation remind me of Janet Parshall. Puglover Mar 2014 #113

Lol, I remember that interview, Randi wiped the floor with that poor woman. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #116

You'd think that the treatment of Pussy Riot would be enough amandabeech Mar 2014 #20

I think you're right. nt MADem Mar 2014 #24

Palin is on the Left? sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #29

I think that she is to the left of Attila the Hun, yes. amandabeech Mar 2014 #31

Can't disagree with that. I misunderstood your comment then, thought you were joining the sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #35

No problem! n/t amandabeech Mar 2014 #62

I'll name names. joshcryer Mar 2014 #93

There was a huge cadre of people with five or six letter nonsense names in lower case letters... MADem Mar 2014 #106

Some revealed themselves long ago with their incessant braying. Behind the Aegis Mar 2014 #6

If you go back to the OLYMPICS threads, early on and even before the games started, there was a MADem Mar 2014 #45

You guys must be referring to me. go west young man Mar 2014 #58

Nope, sorry. Not talking about you. Don't know you. Maybe you can get some attention elsewhere. nt MADem Mar 2014 #70

That is the fact. Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #92

I thought for sure that was only me. joshcryer Mar 2014 #97

+1 joshcryer Mar 2014 #95

Spot on lillypaddle Mar 2014 #7

Weird indeed davidpdx Mar 2014 #8

Putin is kind of awesome. He rides bears! reformist2 Mar 2014 #11

That's because there was no real difference between Uncle Ho and Tricky Dick. riqster Mar 2014 #13

K&R DeSwiss Mar 2014 #14

I think that Sarah wants some of Putin's precious, bodily fluids. amandabeech Mar 2014 #22

Yeah, she's admitted that she watches him from her front porch! DeSwiss Mar 2014 #56

She probably likes it best when he has his shirt off. amandabeech Mar 2014 #64

Well, she can see him from her house. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #66

Yeah well...... DeSwiss Mar 2014 #68

Now THOSE are deserved callouts. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #33

they are irrational spanone Mar 2014 #47

Sarah's not a major figure in any political party. merrily Mar 2014 #76

Daily Caller poll: "Who would make a better US president - Putin or Obama?" muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #81

Whoa. The comments. nt bemildred Mar 2014 #96

A lot of Freeper-style BS there muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #100

Here's a nice song Turbineguy Mar 2014 #83

I remember that--it came out a while ago, I think when Porgie was still Pretzeldunce. MADem Mar 2014 #90

Love the music! Alex Jones loved on Putin years ago, saying 'Putin's patriot who loves his country.' freshwest Mar 2014 #126

Palin's comments were vile even by Palin standards. Rudy as well. Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #99

"You can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska..." gulliver Mar 2014 #109

Well, Putin is no Gorbachev AnnieBW Mar 2014 #125