Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
5. Oh, by in Massachusettts "everyone," I thought you meant everyone in Massachusetts.
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 10:11 AM
Mar 2014

As for the Senate vote, how many Republicans or Democrats, presented with a bill to vote on, are going to vote against sticking a camera up a woman's skirt without her knowledge or consent? And what do you think would happen to him or her the next time he or she was up for re-election?

I don't know what the Senate assumed. The reason I say that is that stories come out all the time about people, mostly female, being filmed without their knowledge this way or through holes in ceilings and walls, or in bathrooms. I think, if I were a legislator, I would think to myself, "Gee there oughtta be a law."

Then, I'd think, "Wait. I'm paid to make laws. I should probably get on this."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mass. lawmakers vote to b...»Reply #5