Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
12. Good question. I suppose you have that Netroots conference but that's pretty lame in comparison.
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 10:48 AM
Mar 2014

I don't think there is any such equivalent. Netroots (does that still exist any more?) is probably the closest thing and Occupy had the potential to unite progressives with its simple "We are the 99%" message but that, sadly, fell apart.

Republicans love going to CPAC. High profile Democratic politicians are simply not going to associate themselves with a similar group of left wing activists, unless they represent a substantial ethnic or other interest group. Democrats will go to NAACP, of course and to feminist and gay rights groups but shun anything related to advancing economic equality unless a sizable amount of votes or money is attached to it.

Lack of coverage or hostile coverage of liberal events by the mainstream media is perfectly understandable. Liberal ideas threaten corporate profits. Conservative ideas, properly disciplined, do not.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Here. roody Mar 2014 #1
That site and organization hardly equates to what the cons have in CPAC. CANDO Mar 2014 #2
Yes, but it is a chance to network roody Mar 2014 #23
Do you want it all? Try this. roody Mar 2014 #25
Somewhere under that good bus no doubt n/t Fumesucker Mar 2014 #3
Sorry for the self reply... CANDO Mar 2014 #4
CPAC is funded by rich conservatives looking to keep their troops inline muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #5
The result of the left not doing a similar conference... CANDO Mar 2014 #8
Who would you want to pay for, and set the agenda, of a liberal conference? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #10
I don't really have an answer. CANDO Mar 2014 #19
yes, Netroots Nation catrose Mar 2014 #35
Good OP and good point. HappyMe Mar 2014 #11
If it happened, it would get no mainstream coverage. roody Mar 2014 #24
How many elected Democrats would alsame Mar 2014 #6
Hard to tell Glitterati Mar 2014 #7
And that we don't have many Democratic pols going near anything "liberal"... CANDO Mar 2014 #9
They've been running away from the alsame Mar 2014 #14
And its a shame. CANDO Mar 2014 #17
Good question. I suppose you have that Netroots conference but that's pretty lame in comparison. bklyncowgirl Mar 2014 #12
What's funny (sad actually), CANDO Mar 2014 #16
Split up among several conferences treestar Mar 2014 #13
Maybe the averge American NEEDS to be scared. HappyMe Mar 2014 #15
That may be, but then they may turn to the comfort of treestar Mar 2014 #34
CPAC is a construct, a show, a sham, not a product of good organizing but a product Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #18
Seems you're missing my point. CANDO Mar 2014 #20
It was not your point I was addressing. I addressed the poster who claimed Repubicans Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #21
I'm sorry! CANDO Mar 2014 #22
It was on Sunday night Capt. Obvious Mar 2014 #26
The Academy Awards CANDO Mar 2014 #28
Imagine a clothes dryer. Imagine a clothes dryer full of ill tempered cats. Imagine turning it on. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #27
So, Rs have a conference so the Ds have to follow suit. Isn't that letting the Rs set the agenda? stopbush Mar 2014 #29
Not following you on one thing. CANDO Mar 2014 #31
CPAC may have been valuable for Conservatives when they were stuck in the political weeds, stopbush Mar 2014 #32
Sounds plausible. CANDO Mar 2014 #33
There is Netroots nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Where is the equivalent L...»Reply #12