Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Reality, 2: Libertarianism, 0 [View all]FSogol
(47,626 posts)35. I'm sure the changed regulation (not rule) will not include the phrase
"noisy, disruptive cell phone speech is now allowed! And there is nothing anyone can do about it1!!"
Again: Normal speech allowed. Noisy disruptive speech still banned.
Anyone have a dead horse smiley?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pretty crappy to call me a libertarian, just because I am not annoyed by other people talking.
FSogol
Mar 2014
#10
The airlines already police disruptions on their planes. They will continue to do so. n/t
FSogol
Mar 2014
#32
Ever notice how the people who talk loudly and self-importantly on cell phones almost always
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2014
#27
Ha! Exactly. In fact, my husband has a friend he's known since grade school who
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2014
#49
I think DU needs a refresher course on the difference between rules and regulations.
FSogol
Mar 2014
#30
And yet, pot legalization and LGBT marriage equality are "libertarian" ideas, too.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#25
The cell phone debate comes down to people wanting to do whatever the hell they like all the time
alarimer
Mar 2014
#40