Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The clash in Crimea is the fruit of western expansion [View all]Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)86. see above
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not the west that left the ex-Soviet Union people cold and hungry
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2014
#7
The first crude steam engine was invented while the Brits were still painting themselves blue
Fumesucker
Mar 2014
#10
I do that too. But I'm not an engine. More like a 4-in-1 conversion device from Husky tools. n/t
jtuck004
Mar 2014
#14
Finally, You've hit the Nub of the issue of concern, but you don't seem to have given any
2banon
Mar 2014
#80
Are you really using a link from Russia Today to back your argument?
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Mar 2014
#65
Calling people "Putin fans" because you dont agree with them is childish. If you have a
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#46
Labeling people as "Putin fans" is an attempt to shame them into silence. If you disagree
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#54
I think you might be confusing "line up behind Putin" with "dont show blind allegiance to
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#117
you don't notice a correlation between the "Syria didn't use that poison gas"
geek tragedy
Mar 2014
#118
Crimea was 'transfered' in the 50's, but do you know how it came to have a majority
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#23
The Tatars are not indigenous, they're a fusion of nomadic groups from Genghis Khan's army
Catherina
Mar 2014
#62
Exactly, and to be more specific: NATO's Nuclear Missiles installations in Poland
2banon
Mar 2014
#43
There's a progressive media resources group? Who knew? What's it under? i don't see it? eom
truth2power
Mar 2014
#109
So quasi-socialist countries should invade countries they call fascist and carve off pieces?
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2014
#9
"fuck the EU" < We have only the wittiest, most professional people on these important affairs. n/t
jtuck004
Mar 2014
#15
That remark was only in the very limited context of the early stage of the Ukraine crisis.
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2014
#16
I am guessing most of them don't speak for the State Department who are paid by people that
jtuck004
Mar 2014
#17
Yes, not "diplomatic" or professional language or attitude, but it did not get us into Iraq.
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2014
#44
The excuses for Russia invading and being on the brink of annexing Crimea are hilarious. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#20
I think it is a simple face saving measure for his guy getting kicked out of Kyiv.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#71
Excuses for Provocations vis a vis NATO Missile installations in Poland are not so hilarious.
2banon
Mar 2014
#45
NATO missiles in Poland = Excuse to invade a part of Ukraine? Yes, that's hilarious. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#70
I agree with the fact that History is chock full of more egregious examples, but I disagree
2banon
Mar 2014
#47
That would work if it was Cheney or Bush saying it. Not me saying it. Not Barack Obama saying it.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#133
The Guardian has to stick to the anti-US narrative come hell or high water...
SidDithers
Mar 2014
#29
I suppose you prefer the American Exceptionalism of ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and Fox. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#55
I see that the actions of Russia have awakened the Neo-Cons both Repubs and Dems.
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#56
It is an absurd fantasy to suppose that only Neocons object to Russia's behavior.
geek tragedy
Mar 2014
#61
I do not support Russian's actions. But I probably will disagree with the Neo-Con's
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#77
Ukraine can decide to opt out of being in Russia's sphere if it so chooses nt
geek tragedy
Mar 2014
#100
Exactly! All Points Well Made. Your logical summation seems to be MIA with others here..
2banon
Mar 2014
#83
NATO is not in Ukraine and that was not on the agenda. EU is a trade bloc
Pretzel_Warrior
Mar 2014
#104
If it was George W. Bush complaining, like he did with South Ossetia, you would have a point.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#134