Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)

12. Heck--I just want proof he did it, once.

Reply to MattSh (Reply #2)

Fri Mar 7, 2014, 05:17 PM

Mar 2014

You would think there would be some evidence....like an email or two.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Snowden: I raised NSA concerns internally over 10 times before going rogue [View all] Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 OP

k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Mar 2014 #1

Then why didn't you do it 10 more times... MattSh Mar 2014 #2

Heck--I just want proof he did it, once. msanthrope Mar 2014 #12

I agree -- I want to see evidence first perdita9 Mar 2014 #14

Complete testimony in PDF from The EU parliament. Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #3

Aha! So we can add perjurer to the list of adjectives. cui bono Mar 2014 #4

It's too bad you put up the sarcasm smiley Jack Rabbit Mar 2014 #7

Agree with Jack Rabbit. I was so ready to jump on you! n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #8

I find it interesting that so many people will refuse to believe that Clapper lied to Congress, Maedhros Mar 2014 #15

exactly..clapper lied and we're still here defending snowden..something wrong with this picture..nt xiamiam Mar 2014 #20

The misbehavior of an individual is an outrage and must be punished. Maedhros Mar 2014 #33

Divert and smear. woo me with science Mar 2014 #21

Thank you - I hadn't seen the "Seventeen techniques" post. Maedhros Mar 2014 #32

It's on target, for sure. woo me with science Mar 2014 #36

The introduction Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #5

Oops!... There goes another irrelevant Talking Point. bvar22 Mar 2014 #6

+1000! n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #9

+1000 DeSwiss Mar 2014 #38

Oh...puleaze. SoapBox Mar 2014 #10

The other thread where it was pointed out that Snowden provided no proof wasn't going so well msanthrope Mar 2014 #11

Certainly appears that way itsrobert Mar 2014 #13

So do you think he committed perjury then? n/t cui bono Mar 2014 #16

That "other thread" "wasn't going so well" ??? bvar22 Mar 2014 #17

Well you know there's never more than one thread on any given topic at any given time cui bono Mar 2014 #19

I posted this 4 minutes before willy Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #23

I'm not complaining. I was being sarcastic. It's telling that someone would bring that up cui bono Mar 2014 #29

They literally have NOTHING, bvar22 Mar 2014 #31

So you think he committed perjury then? n/t cui bono Mar 2014 #18

What 10 officials did he report this to? nt SunSeeker Mar 2014 #22

Address your question to the EU parliament Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #24

So you don't know? nt SunSeeker Mar 2014 #25

You want him to name names? Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #27

Why is that a "breach"? Under what law? nt SunSeeker Mar 2014 #28

Well at least he finally admits he wasn't a whistleblower... Historic NY Mar 2014 #26

How so? cui bono Mar 2014 #30

"as a contractor he had no legal avenue to pursue further whistleblowing". Historic NY Mar 2014 #34

Now you're playing word games really. cui bono Mar 2014 #40

"Snowden Swiftboaters" bvar22 Mar 2014 #41

Yeah, you're right. DeSwiss Mar 2014 #37

+ a million nt laundry_queen Mar 2014 #39

K&R DeSwiss Mar 2014 #35