General Discussion

BainsBane

(57,760 posts)

135. This decision was made by the judge

Fri Mar 7, 2014, 09:09 PM

Mar 2014

And you clearly know nothing about the events of Dylan Farrow's rape allegations and the Allen custody suit or you would not be repeating accusations ruled without foundation in a court of law. Allen provided NO evidence to the courts of brain washing and it was clear that Dylan told her story at the time to multiple people, including a shrink hired by Allen, outside of the presence of her mother. Vilifying Farrow is nothing but repeating the output of a rich man's publicity machine.

BTW, Mia Farrow's lawyer was Allen Dershowitz.
No one expects lawyers to behave in anyway they aren't forced to by the rules of their profession. And that you happen to see a common attorney between these two cases means nothing. Most people would actually find shielding a child molester a worse breach of decency than representing the former partner of one, YMMV.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

161 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Woman ordered to give back child support after losing custody of kids because she had an abortion [View all] n2doc Mar 2014 OP

The children are likely better off with their father. closeupready Mar 2014 #1

Better off with the father, why? BainsBane Mar 2014 #2

Well.... bunnies Mar 2014 #10

Did she committ Fraud in court filings FreakinDJ Mar 2014 #51

There is no reference to that in the article BainsBane Mar 2014 #57

Why? upaloopa Mar 2014 #3

Do you think she's a bad mother? nt MrScorpio Mar 2014 #5

The judge, a woman also, made her ruling. In the absence closeupready Mar 2014 #30

That's all you got? nt MrScorpio Mar 2014 #36

That's all I need. closeupready Mar 2014 #41

Having an abortion does not reflect on parenting ability BainsBane Mar 2014 #46

Because she's ruling this way because she doesn't like that the woman had sex cui bono Mar 2014 #107

a female judge in NYC made one of the most sexist rulings ever last year geek tragedy Mar 2014 #37

So because she was a woman involved in a woman related issue LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #43

I'm seeing this alot on DU lately. Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #65

Uhm, many women are anti-choice and despise women who have had abortions riderinthestorm Mar 2014 #84

Who cares if the judge is a woman? treestar Mar 2014 #105

Based on what? A woman had sex, became pregnant, and terminated the pregnancy. 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #7

I could tell you how the judge probably see it but it was be ridiculous. nt 1awake Mar 2014 #50

Why would you think that? Marrah_G Mar 2014 #8

I'm inclined to trust the judge's ruling. She is also a woman. closeupready Mar 2014 #33

You forgot the most important point BainsBane Mar 2014 #48

no, you're not. you think that it's ok for the judge to rule cali Mar 2014 #54

+1 nt NutmegYankee Mar 2014 #109

Interesting, yet unsupported allegation you got there, little fella... LanternWaste Mar 2014 #71

Perhaps because he abused their mother? You seem to find that less egregious VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #106

so is Bachman and Palin JI7 Mar 2014 #128

you mean the abusive, prostitute-using father, right? and you think THAT is better parent niyad Mar 2014 #159

well, for starters he is a violent man Tumbulu Mar 2014 #160

Why are the children likely better off with their father? ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #9

I also would like an answer on this. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #16

Repeating myself now, but the judge (a woman) ruled based upon closeupready Mar 2014 #34

female judges can be sexist and misogynist assholes too, just as much as male ones geek tragedy Mar 2014 #38

Just like Michelle Bachman or Virginia Foxx LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #44

or the matriarch of the patriarchy, Phyllis Schlafly nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #49

Do you have any actual evidence this particular judge is a "misogynist asshole"? struggle4progress Mar 2014 #77

No, I was rebutting the claim that a judge should be presumed to be fair to women geek tragedy Mar 2014 #78

Seems to be a story from months ago, resurrected for its zombie apocalypse tour: struggle4progress Mar 2014 #81

judges who issue shitty rulings never like it when those rulings get attention geek tragedy Mar 2014 #83

Yes - she called the abortion 'relevant' (nt) muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #125

... Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Lori Sattler said she decided to allow the evidence struggle4progress Mar 2014 #142

And that is absolute bullshit kcr Mar 2014 #151

I don't know what her other testimony was struggle4progress Mar 2014 #154

Yes you do. It says it in the article kcr Mar 2014 #156

You have much greater faith in press accuracy than I do: I typically find I don't grasp struggle4progress Mar 2014 #157

Then why bother even reading news articles and commenting on them kcr Mar 2014 #158

But there's nothing about her ever denying she had an abortion muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #152

I don't know what her other testimony was struggle4progress Mar 2014 #155

so what if the judge was a woman. clarence thomas is black cali Mar 2014 #56

I find it more unlikely that the decision is misogynist than closeupready Mar 2014 #66

"I have seen no information about this female judge evidencing misogyny or sexism." redqueen Mar 2014 #73

Upon further reflection, I'd simply support Steve's argument below. closeupready Mar 2014 #75

I've heard women Judges give harsher rulings to other women. Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #147

What if the judge is a Michelle Bachman/Sarah Palin-level conservative crusader? Maedhros Mar 2014 #61

"necessarily" WTF???? VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #108

You're repeating yourself but you're still not answering the question. cui bono Mar 2014 #110

But we know the judge thought the abortion 'relevant', which is evidence of crappy judgement muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #124

That too treestar Mar 2014 #104

other than the fact that he's a man, on what do you base that? nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #19

That would be his reason lunasun Mar 2014 #35

Its obviously one of those MRA fanatics....just found an opportunity for cheering that a man VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #111

There is nothing in the record to even remotely support your opinion. dballance Mar 2014 #21

So you like your steak well done Capt. Obvious Mar 2014 #27

Because he has money? get the red out Mar 2014 #28

Hit and run? Scootaloo Mar 2014 #29

why? do explain why the children are better off with the father cali Mar 2014 #53

And the very first reply to this thread is an example of what makes DU suck. PeaceNikki Mar 2014 #141

Disgusting ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #4

Judge Needs To Be Beaten with Sticks In A Public Square, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #6

What Mag Said ProfessorGAC Mar 2014 #24

Thank You, Professor! A Pleasure To See You About The Place The Magistrate Mar 2014 #26

Oh, I've Been Here ProfessorGAC Mar 2014 #63

if only I could rec your post. n/t cali Mar 2014 #58

The bias reeks from the judge: Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #11

The judge's bias is just awful! dballance Mar 2014 #23

Horrible for the young woman..clear bias, imo. Hope it works out for her. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #25

Well that was disturbing to read,the judge sufrommich Mar 2014 #12

After reading the article I'd be on her side. Xyzse Mar 2014 #13

The Judge putting too much weight to the warrant46 Mar 2014 #31

Clearly the judge is anti-choice and is ruling based on her own biases nt riderinthestorm Mar 2014 #85

+1 warrant46 Mar 2014 #153

Not enough info PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #14

The level of child support has to meet a minimum standard Gormy Cuss Mar 2014 #47

So I read the article pipi_k Mar 2014 #15

One would imagine that mental health information would have been offered in court ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #17

Sometimes things get brought up pipi_k Mar 2014 #39

The ruling has to be made on evidence submitted. cui bono Mar 2014 #112

Things that are not submitted as evidence cannot be ScreamingMeemie Mar 2014 #146

"her other two children"? LeftyMom Mar 2014 #18

And pipi_k Mar 2014 #40

She had a first trimester abortion. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #52

And so pipi_k Mar 2014 #88

My pregnancy losses (note the plural) were later than yours and later than that woman's abortion. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #91

Oh, we're going to play pipi_k Mar 2014 #99

You can call your pregnancy whatever you want, you don't get to define hers. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #101

I was "defining her pregnancy"??? pipi_k Mar 2014 #118

You know you're not fooling anybody, right? LeftyMom Mar 2014 #121

Good job there Lefty. JimDandy Mar 2014 #130

Oh good grief. It was not a child and you don't JimDandy Mar 2014 #127

We all have the right to think of our own pregnancies as children if we want gollygee Mar 2014 #93

Sigh... pipi_k Mar 2014 #100

No. You are posting on a public message board. cui bono Mar 2014 #117

I don't mind pipi_k Mar 2014 #129

However she may choose to define her aborted fetus Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #148

+1 cui bono Mar 2014 #114

While you may feel that emotionally, scientifically it just isn't so. cui bono Mar 2014 #113

Did I ever pipi_k Mar 2014 #132

Because she only has two children. Not two "other" children. n/t cui bono Mar 2014 #139

The judges ruling was specific,she was sufrommich Mar 2014 #20

That doesn't mean pipi_k Mar 2014 #45

yes, it does mean there was nothing else- at least as far as what was presented legally. cali Mar 2014 #59

And the qualifying pipi_k Mar 2014 #89

what was legally presented is the only thing that is considered in a courtroom cali Mar 2014 #92

Because pipi_k Mar 2014 #95

This is a legal ruling of a court of law. cui bono Mar 2014 #119

OK, you're right... pipi_k Mar 2014 #133

Your words, not mine. cui bono Mar 2014 #140

why in the world was a supeona for HER health records relevant....shouldn't HIS health VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #115

HOW did he get ahold of her medical records??!? alittlelark Mar 2014 #150

Why is ANYONE surprised that Mia Farrow's attorney would engage in such tactics???? nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #22

It's not enough an accused child molester is still free, with small children in his home BainsBane Mar 2014 #55

Indeed--having a long memory for the piece of shit attorney whose tactics were cheered when msanthrope Mar 2014 #62

This decision was made by the judge BainsBane Mar 2014 #135

You don't know he's a child molester. n/t cui bono Mar 2014 #120

Wow. SheilaT Mar 2014 #32

Even worse. The man gets to go have illegal sex. cui bono Mar 2014 #123

"Illegal sex"? Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #134

Not sure but the referee at the session flagged him. cui bono Mar 2014 #137

Got it. Missed that portion of the story. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #144

He paid a prostitute for sex, which is illegal gollygee Mar 2014 #138

... Sattler allowed the evidence in over the objections of Lisa�s lawyers, who contended struggle4progress Mar 2014 #42

It showed she was a bad catholic, and that she did't have men over but went to their place and uppityperson Mar 2014 #68

It's an ugly high-profile divorce case with both attorneys hoping to use the press for advantage struggle4progress Mar 2014 #69

I don't recall the wife testifying that she had taken a vow of chastity nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #79

Taxes pay experts in matrimonial law, like Justice Lori Sattler, to sort out these ugly divorces struggle4progress Mar 2014 #86

NYC judges get their positions based on political connections, not expertise geek tragedy Mar 2014 #90

The ruling is obviously ridiculous. I'm just surprised that anyone is surprised that a custody stevenleser Mar 2014 #60

+100. I should have known better than closeupready Mar 2014 #67

YEP I called it...Men's Rights Activists.... VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #122

So you agree with the ruling or you agree with stevenleser who says it's crazy? cui bono Mar 2014 #126

Your views on custody hearings are... interesting. redqueen Mar 2014 #76

would you favor a legal presumption that domestic violence makes a geek tragedy Mar 2014 #80

No,this isn't about this messy divorce case,it's sufrommich Mar 2014 #82

This is an anti-choice judge allowing her biases' to come into play with her ruling riderinthestorm Mar 2014 #87

This is just wrong proudretiredvet Mar 2014 #64

This isn't shit but a nasty cat fight!! mstinamotorcity2 Mar 2014 #70

There has to be more to this... deathrind Mar 2014 #72

I believe you are right. proudretiredvet Mar 2014 #74

It's been my experience pipi_k Mar 2014 #94

Why in the hell should she give back child support that was used ohheckyeah Mar 2014 #96

I am just happy that this was not in Texas Gothmog Mar 2014 #97

So this is what I missed out on . . . Brigid Mar 2014 #98

The state of New York must have standards for custody orders treestar Mar 2014 #102

Why does a legal medical procedure cause someone to lose custody of her children? n/t cui bono Mar 2014 #103

Let's assume there is more to this story than presented penultimate Mar 2014 #116

This is just judicial slut shaming Warpy Mar 2014 #131

that's basically it. nt laundry_queen Mar 2014 #143

+1 LAGC Mar 2014 #149

This website is a copyright infringement of the UK tabloid Daily Mail alp227 Mar 2014 #136

read my byline. n/t n2doc Mar 2014 #145

I'm guessing that the $50,000 kiva Mar 2014 #161