General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

31. I saw this. grrrr. sexist dogshit. as if leadership means you have to a have a penis.

Reply to Purveyor (Original post)

Sat Mar 8, 2014, 10:27 AM

Mar 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Julian Assange: Is President Obama Wearing Pants? [View all] Purveyor Mar 2014 OP

Shorter Assange: Please don't forget about me. I still matter! nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #1

... MADem Mar 2014 #27

So many foreigners worried about American citizens' constitutional and privacy rights. TwilightGardener Mar 2014 #2

Guess we're even bigwillq Mar 2014 #12

...^ that 840high Mar 2014 #53

There are a few of us Americans who are worried about the same thing. former9thward Mar 2014 #39

Yep. nt Mojorabbit Mar 2014 #57

Not only that, he can keep them on, too, Jules BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #3

Boom! babylonsister Mar 2014 #4

... tammywammy Mar 2014 #13

LOL Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #15

Ahahaha! BenzoDia Mar 2014 #20

LOL FSogol Mar 2014 #21

And with that, you win the thread... SidDithers Mar 2014 #22

Unlike several of our Democratic presidents. And Assange was single... Luminous Animal Mar 2014 #24

Hmm...why the swipe at Democrats unrelated to this thread? nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #37

Interesting, ain't it? Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #50

How quickly a poster gets to the Clenis is usually an indicator for me. I mean, I get msanthrope Mar 2014 #59

Boom, indeed, goes that dyn-o-mite! Full marks! nt MADem Mar 2014 #28

Well DUH! No Dem Pres gets control of every intel operation since BFEE took it over in the early70s. blm Mar 2014 #5

Still a predator I see Politicalboi Mar 2014 #6

We also know when the American people take something seriously. randome Mar 2014 #7

Obama's pants must be with his comfortable walking shoes and peace prize. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #8

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #9

Totally agree treestar Mar 2014 #17

Well, Congress makes law...and all approprpriations start in the House. MADem Mar 2014 #29

We know Assange's had trouble keeping his own pants on. pnwmom Mar 2014 #10

Going to address the topic at hand? 1000words Mar 2014 #16

I don't think I'd touch that pnwmom Mar 2014 #18

This RW asshole surfaces every time the RW assholes in this country start talking shit. ProSense Mar 2014 #11

Yes, he's wearing "mom pants" according to Sarah Palin and her echo chamber. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #14

Interesting Interview...once one gets past Subject Line (Not your Fault) KoKo Mar 2014 #19

Ah! The long-awaited 627th Epistle of St Julian to the Peanut Gallery! struggle4progress Mar 2014 #23

Interesting how many replies attack Assange rather than address the issue. Scuba Mar 2014 #25

The 'issue' is that Obama isn't wearing any pants? randome Mar 2014 #26

And another. Scuba Mar 2014 #34

The point is pretty obvious. I'm not surprised that you don't want to address it. /nt Marr Mar 2014 #42

What issue? Obama's trousers? Assange's petulant boredom? MADem Mar 2014 #30

Look, still another. Scuba Mar 2014 #32

You'd think, when there's "still another," that perhaps you're on the wrong side of the argument...? MADem Mar 2014 #35

I'm not backing Assange, I'm criticizing those who try to deflect his revelations by smearing him. Scuba Mar 2014 #36

What "smear" -- pray tell? Did he not use a lame, sexist reference to try and "smear" Obama? MADem Mar 2014 #38

You keep missing the point. I have not defended Assange. Scuba Mar 2014 #41

No, I'm afraid YOU keep missing the point, and I'm not the only one pointing it out. MADem Mar 2014 #45

Has Clapper been prosecuted yet? Did I miss that? Scuba Mar 2014 #46

And what does Clapper have to do with "Waaah, waaah, Obama has no Paaaaaaants!!!" MADem Mar 2014 #47

Why would Clapper be prosecuted? No a single congressperson has initiated the action msanthrope Mar 2014 #60

What's it tell me? That the NSA has dirt on all of them. Scuba Mar 2014 #61

Or, maybe, the elements of perjury cannot be proved. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #62

Doesn't matter, he confessed. Scuba Mar 2014 #64

Um, yeah...it does matter. You can lie, without committing perjury. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #65

because he cloaked his message in horrible sexist dogshit terms cali Mar 2014 #33

He's saying the same BS Palin was treestar Mar 2014 #40

Exactly right. As always, the pattern speaks volumes. woo me with science Mar 2014 #67

I saw this. grrrr. sexist dogshit. as if leadership means you have to a have a penis. cali Mar 2014 #31

This is the guy who called Sweden "the Saudi Arabia of feminism." msanthrope Mar 2014 #43

it's not more excusable for me cali Mar 2014 #48

And due credit to you for the consistency cali mcar Mar 2014 #54

Perhaps those defending this swipe might want to consider... OilemFirchen Mar 2014 #55

With the allegations of the CIA spying on that Congressional oversight committee... Marr Mar 2014 #44

many really seem not to care G_j Mar 2014 #58

That's rich, coming from a guy who hangs out in his bathrobe in the Ecuadorian embassy, Nye Bevan Mar 2014 #49

The stone in the shoe.... msanthrope Mar 2014 #68

I have no love for him, but he is completely correct. nt 1awake Mar 2014 #51

It doesn't matter who wears the pants. As long as there is no transparency and oversight Autumn Mar 2014 #52

Then why isn't he talking about that? randome Mar 2014 #66

A better question is why isn't the President talking about these issues. Autumn Mar 2014 #69

The better point is that no one has the pants. DirkGently Mar 2014 #56

No One has the Pants...Surveillance State is it's OWN COUNTRY... KoKo Mar 2014 #63