Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Julian Assange: Is President Obama Wearing Pants? [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)47. And what does Clapper have to do with "Waaah, waaah, Obama has no Paaaaaaants!!!"
You aren't making your case. Just as Assange didn't make his with that absurdly childish insult.
Pssst--here's a clue for you....the people who need to "charge" Clapper with misconduct are in CONGRESS. You might want to direct your inquiry to them, rather than screeching at Obama. Here's some background:
The US Congress, by right of a 1938 law has the right to require people to appear before either body (House or Senate). This is issued in the form of a subpoena in most cases. When a person fails to appear or fails to testify, Congress is empowered by the same law to find the person in contempt of congress. More loosely, any person who impedes a congressional investigation may be cited as being in contempt. Acts impeding an investigation include failing to appear when summoned, failing to produce requested documents, or lying to congress in an attempt to obstruct an investigation.
Contempt of congress is very much like being held in contempt by a judge or a federal or state court. If you fail to answer a subpoena in a regular court can earn you a contempt citation. Similarly refusing to answer questions if you do appear and are doing things like hiding evidence pertaining to an investigation, you can be charged with contempt.
Another similarity in contempt of congress is your rights if you receive a subpoena. Under most circumstances, you can claim 5th Amendment rights if testimony you give would be self-incriminating. If the House or Senate is investigating some scandal that directly concerns the person subpoenaed, the person need not incriminate himself by giving testimony. Still, failure to answer the subpoena and appear as appointed may have repercussions. It is in fact breaking a law.
Under current US law, a person found in contempt of congress has committed a misdemeanor, may serve up to 12 months in prison and may be fined. It is up to the house conducting the investigation to determine whether such fines or a prison sentence are appropriate. Sometimes Congress does not act even on cases where a person is in longstanding contempt. The hope may be that simply declaring someone in contempt of congress may result in his or her appearance, though this is not always the case.....
Contempt of congress is very much like being held in contempt by a judge or a federal or state court. If you fail to answer a subpoena in a regular court can earn you a contempt citation. Similarly refusing to answer questions if you do appear and are doing things like hiding evidence pertaining to an investigation, you can be charged with contempt.
Another similarity in contempt of congress is your rights if you receive a subpoena. Under most circumstances, you can claim 5th Amendment rights if testimony you give would be self-incriminating. If the House or Senate is investigating some scandal that directly concerns the person subpoenaed, the person need not incriminate himself by giving testimony. Still, failure to answer the subpoena and appear as appointed may have repercussions. It is in fact breaking a law.
Under current US law, a person found in contempt of congress has committed a misdemeanor, may serve up to 12 months in prison and may be fined. It is up to the house conducting the investigation to determine whether such fines or a prison sentence are appropriate. Sometimes Congress does not act even on cases where a person is in longstanding contempt. The hope may be that simply declaring someone in contempt of congress may result in his or her appearance, though this is not always the case.....
Now...what does that have to do with "Obama's pants," hmmmmm?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So many foreigners worried about American citizens' constitutional and privacy rights.
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#2
How quickly a poster gets to the Clenis is usually an indicator for me. I mean, I get
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#59
Well DUH! No Dem Pres gets control of every intel operation since BFEE took it over in the early70s.
blm
Mar 2014
#5
Obama's pants must be with his comfortable walking shoes and peace prize.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#8
This RW asshole surfaces every time the RW assholes in this country start talking shit.
ProSense
Mar 2014
#11
Ah! The long-awaited 627th Epistle of St Julian to the Peanut Gallery!
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#23
The point is pretty obvious. I'm not surprised that you don't want to address it. /nt
Marr
Mar 2014
#42
You'd think, when there's "still another," that perhaps you're on the wrong side of the argument...?
MADem
Mar 2014
#35
I'm not backing Assange, I'm criticizing those who try to deflect his revelations by smearing him.
Scuba
Mar 2014
#36
What "smear" -- pray tell? Did he not use a lame, sexist reference to try and "smear" Obama?
MADem
Mar 2014
#38
No, I'm afraid YOU keep missing the point, and I'm not the only one pointing it out.
MADem
Mar 2014
#45
And what does Clapper have to do with "Waaah, waaah, Obama has no Paaaaaaants!!!"
MADem
Mar 2014
#47
Why would Clapper be prosecuted? No a single congressperson has initiated the action
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#60
I saw this. grrrr. sexist dogshit. as if leadership means you have to a have a penis.
cali
Mar 2014
#31
With the allegations of the CIA spying on that Congressional oversight committee...
Marr
Mar 2014
#44
That's rich, coming from a guy who hangs out in his bathrobe in the Ecuadorian embassy,
Nye Bevan
Mar 2014
#49