General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: About that cross at Ground Zero... [View all]goldent
(1,582 posts)I first thought that the American Atheists weren't thinking clearly, or didn't have their best people working on this, when they decided to make a legal challenge.
But it goes against any semblance of common sense, and has every appearance of masochism on the part of the American Atheists. The only thing that could make it worse would be if they won the case. Of course they have no chance of winning -- arguing that historical events that have a religious element are not actually part of history is absurd. And implying that the cross is somehow honoring the Christian victims of the attack shows a complete misunderstanding of its actual historical significance.
So I'm still puzzled at why the American Atheists did this. In another thread, I mentioned that sometimes major donors with an ideological streak can force organizations to do things that really don't make sense (as a condition of their donations). It can also be leadership gone amok in an organization that doesn't have a solid system of corporate governance.