Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
16. Yes. But, I suppose it's rationalized because the cost of idle labor can be externalized
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 10:26 AM
Mar 2014

-IF- capital isn't shunted/wasted on unemployment benefits and/or wages that allow workers to 'bridge' idle times.

Capitalist ideology runs along the lines that more and more capital is good for everyone, and it would be if capital is put in the service of everyone. But, operationalized capitalism, evidenced by the day-to-day business practices at the level of individuals and corporations whose goal is to maximize ROI and accumulate material wealth demands minimizing every cost that drags on that process.

The unfortunate part of global capitalism is that the benefits of capitalism to a nation (such as the maintenance of standard of living, the presence of a 'middle class' etc. which are the avatars rolled out to suggest the superiority of national capitalistic economies) require reciprocal traffic among all components in a national economic web. Yet the material wealth in contemporary capitalism tends to create reservoirs of concentrated wealth which rather than re-entering the national economic web flow, are either sunk into internationalized derivative financial instruments, or via international investment in production outside the nation...which is to say into external 'sinks' which enable minimization of those nasty dragging costs.

The potential of unused land to capitalism is that it contains resources which have capital value if they can be introduced into private wealth via extraction and marketing.

This resource exploitation also has the value of creating supply, which lowers purchase price and thereby costs of products derived from those resources.







Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"allocated to the highest-value use." Martin Eden Mar 2014 #1
Value in capitalism does seem to mean 'market value' HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #2
And yet having 10 to 20 percent of the working age population idle and unproductive fasttense Mar 2014 #10
Yes. But, I suppose it's rationalized because the cost of idle labor can be externalized HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #16
Thanks for a very good explanation. fasttense Mar 2014 #17
Agree - an interesting explanation erronis Mar 2014 #26
Yes, of course "value" =profits for Ryan and the interests he represents. Martin Eden Mar 2014 #18
I totally agree. But here is the rub...captialism is about material wealth. HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #20
K&R ReRe Mar 2014 #3
I would add loss of access to safe abortions. nt Bonobo Mar 2014 #4
Agreed! GreenPartyVoter Mar 2014 #6
The term "equal protection" The Wizard Mar 2014 #5
Nevada Kilgore Mar 2014 #7
A lot of Nevada land is leased by the BLM to ranchers Art_from_Ark Mar 2014 #12
anyone is welcome to travel on BLM land. airplaneman Mar 2014 #21
A possible question back to you... fleabiscuit Mar 2014 #22
Value, in the way I used the term, Kilgore Mar 2014 #29
I assumed so, but I'm trying to kick the habit. fleabiscuit Mar 2014 #30
It's going to be a long, hard struggle to get back what we've lost. reformist2 Mar 2014 #8
K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2014 #9
k&r for the truth, however depressing it may be. n/t Laelth Mar 2014 #11
Rec'd n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #13
k and r (note to self: quit reading this depressing stuff before caffeine!) niyad Mar 2014 #14
that smug, arrogant, sneering visage makes me want to throw up. the utter contempt he feels niyad Mar 2014 #15
And we'll do nothing. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2014 #19
I would add Rape wouldsman Mar 2014 #23
DURec for an excellent article. bvar22 Mar 2014 #24
K&R! Phlem Mar 2014 #25
, blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #27
Actually, I've run into Conservatives who think we should dam the Grand Canyon.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #28
Hey Ms. Lizzie - FairWinds Mar 2014 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»4 Frightening Ways We're ...»Reply #16