General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Torture Whistleblower: I got 30 months in prison. Why does Leon Panetta get a pass? [View all]struggle4progress
(126,184 posts)from 2007. It's just slick apologetics: even in the first interview, Kiriakou claims to be deeply troubled by torture, but his take-home message is always that the US had no time to use more sophisticated methods, that waterboarding is extremely effective, and that he'd use the same techniques again. Quite a lot of what he said turned out later to be factually incorrect. Since then, his supporters preferentially cite his statements about his discomfort with torture to claim he was whistle-blowing -- but he wasn't: he was pushing the nice folksy-sounding line: Like you, I'm not comfortable with torture, but it really works incredibly well in an emergency, and I'd do it again
BRIAN ROSS: But given that you felt that-- water-boarding and the enhanced interrogation broke him, if you -- if somebody else was caught today, wouldn't you wanna use those same techniques?
JOHN: I think that I would be very tempted to use the same techniques. I --
BRIAN ROSS: In other words, in your view, they -- they do work?
JOHN: I-- yes, they do work.
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Blotter/brianross_kiriakou_transcript1_blotter071210.pdf
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Blotter/brianross_kiriakou_transcript2_blotter071210.pdf
... it's important to recall that Kiriakou's role in the media debate over torture was, in effect, to endorse the practicealbeit with some caveats.
Is John Kiriakou a Whistleblower?
By Peter Hart