Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,793 posts)
24. The separate policy doesn't make sense to me either.
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 08:27 PM
Mar 2014

They tried to pull that on us once, and I made them back down. But the reason was different.

There are 3 of us - same gender couple and daughter. Putting us on separate policies (our daughter and I on one, and my spouse on another) increased our out of pocket expenses by 50%, since we had a $6000 deductible on the "family" policy and an additional $3000 on my spouse's policy, instead of a $6000 maximum for the family. The company intended to offer family coverage, but had apparently not thought through the practical details of what it might mean (potentially double the out of pocket - if we had had 2 children, with each one biologically related to one of us). They were trying to avoid recoding their software (which required a gender for every family member, and wasn't set up to handle same gender couples). Their solution (which was the same identical cost for an adult only family) was just issue 2 separate policies. With kids in the mix, it dramatically increased our costs.

They did a work-around for the first year, and had rewritten the software for the state by the second year. Either they had never encountered a same gender family with children before - or the others all accepted, "Be thankful your family is covered at all," which was their first response. My response was, "no." and send me to the person who is your supervisor, and their supervisor, etc. I should check and see if my kindergarten report card said I played well with others...I suspect not.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Any healthcare navigators here? [View all] Glitterati Mar 2014 OP
Yep, pretty much Warpy Mar 2014 #1
So she's just screwed? Glitterati Mar 2014 #2
Call any (responsive) representative you have...state and federal... CTyankee Mar 2014 #3
I have tried that as well Glitterati Mar 2014 #5
She's got a lot of company, too Warpy Mar 2014 #4
She DOES qualify to be on my subsidized plan Glitterati Mar 2014 #6
This is clearly insane, then Warpy Mar 2014 #8
Her job situation WILL improve, she does seasonal work Glitterati Mar 2014 #10
We ran into a similar problem scorpiogirl Mar 2014 #7
OMG, what a total clusterf**k! Glitterati Mar 2014 #9
Yes! The bureaucracy is the worst. scorpiogirl Mar 2014 #12
I just realized I have been working on this since November 1 Glitterati Mar 2014 #16
I wonder if a class action suit against the state would work in a state like Georgia where they are jwirr Mar 2014 #30
We need an attorney willing to bring this case Glitterati Mar 2014 #36
Sounds a lot like my problem and why I will not get Insurance. I'll take the fine. Cofitachequi Mar 2014 #11
Your income is too low for you to be fined. missingthebigdog Mar 2014 #14
yet, more than one third of my income cannot go to healthcare. Cofitachequi Mar 2014 #41
As written, the ACA would be providing your care virtually free. missingthebigdog Mar 2014 #43
Reaaly? On my behalf you're going to HOPE for CHANGE. Thanks. Cofitachequi Mar 2014 #44
Excuse me for trying to be nice. missingthebigdog Mar 2014 #45
My sis has been dealing with the incompetent navigators for weeks. Skip Intro Mar 2014 #13
Oh, don't I know it!!!! Glitterati Mar 2014 #15
sucks when the right wing is right. Cofitachequi Mar 2014 #42
OK, the latest from healthcare.gov Glitterati Mar 2014 #17
her income will be considered for your "shared" out-of-pocket Schema Thing Mar 2014 #18
Even if she's on a separate policy? Glitterati Mar 2014 #19
well, no, it shouldn't be considered in that case Schema Thing Mar 2014 #21
I went for a great plan - Humana Silver Glitterati Mar 2014 #23
Generally the way insurance works - Ms. Toad Mar 2014 #20
OK, that makes sense Glitterati Mar 2014 #22
The separate policy doesn't make sense to me either. Ms. Toad Mar 2014 #24
The hoop jumping is insane! Glitterati Mar 2014 #28
WHY do they have "enrollment periods" at all? It's ridiculous. LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #25
It does make sense. subterranean Mar 2014 #26
Because that is how folks game the system. While most of us pay in Hoyt Mar 2014 #27
The sad thing is Glitterati Mar 2014 #29
The problem is with the people leading your state and making decisions. bluestate10 Mar 2014 #46
Well, the FIRST thing that has to happen is for DEMs to get on the ballots Glitterati Mar 2014 #48
My 30-year-old daughter hasn't had health insurance for years LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #31
Your daughter will qualify for Medicaid Glitterati Mar 2014 #32
Thanks! That's very good news. nt LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #33
That's different, and I get it. But, there are people who think it's OK to go without and then Hoyt Mar 2014 #37
It's stupid and arbitrary Glitterati Mar 2014 #40
Enrollment periods come around every six months, so the next one should be in May. bluestate10 Mar 2014 #47
Medicaid caseworker here Puzzledtraveller Mar 2014 #34
Any idea what the delay is? Glitterati Mar 2014 #35
What state are you in? Puzzledtraveller Mar 2014 #38
Georgia n/t Glitterati Mar 2014 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Any healthcare navigators...»Reply #24